Literature DB >> 32086716

Does dual-tasking provide additional value in timed "up and go" test for predicting the occurrence of falls? A longitudinal observation study by age group (young-older or old-older adults).

Tsuyoshi Asai1, Kensuke Oshima2, Yoshihiro Fukumoto3, Yuri Yonezawa4, Asuka Matsuo5, Shogo Misu6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies using relatively large samples and longitudinal observational designs reported dual-tasking had additional value in timed "up and go" test (TUG) for falls assessment among well-functioning older adults. AIM: To elucidate the additional value of dual-tasking in TUG for predicting the occurrence of falls among community-dwelling older adults by age group using a predictive model.
METHODS: This longitudinal observation study included 987 community-dwelling older adults at baseline. A TUG without performing another task (single-TUG) and a TUG while counting aloud backward from 100 were conducted at baseline. We computed the dual-task cost (DTC) value, which is used to quantify trends in subjects' execution of motor tests under dual-task conditions. Data on fall history were obtained using a self-administered questionnaire at the 1-year follow-up. The final analysis included 649 individuals divided into a young-older adult group (aged 60-74 years) and an old-older adult group (aged ≥ 75 years). Associations between the occurrence of falls and TUG-related values were analyzed by age group using multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: For old-older adults, there were significant associations between the occurrence of falls and single-TUG time (odds ratio [OR] 1.143, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.018-1.285) and DTC value (OR 0.981, 95% CI 0.963-0.999). No significant associations were observed for young-older adults.
CONCLUSIONS: Slower single-TUG time and lower DTC value are associated with the occurrence of falls among old-older adults but not among young-older adults. Dual tasking may provide an additional value in TUG for predicting falls among old-older adults.

Keywords:  Community-dwelling older adults; Dual tasking; Fall; Timed “up and go” test

Year:  2020        PMID: 32086716     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-020-01510-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   3.636


  1 in total

1.  A taxonomy of cognitive tasks to evaluate cognitive-motor interference on spatiotemoporal gait parameters in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  B Wollesen; M Wanstrath; K S van Schooten; K Delbaere
Journal:  Eur Rev Aging Phys Act       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.878

  1 in total
  4 in total

1.  Do the dual-task "8-foot up and go" tests provide additional predictive value for early detection of cognitive decline in community-dwelling older women?

Authors:  Jingjing Wang; Jin-Tao Hong; Yun Xiang; Chunhua Zhang
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  A Novel Way of Measuring Dual-Task Interference: The Reliability and Construct Validity of the Dual-Task Effect Battery in Neurodegenerative Disease.

Authors:  Jason K Longhurst; John V Rider; Jeffrey L Cummings; Samantha E John; Brach Poston; Elissa C Held Bradford; Merrill R Landers
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.895

3.  A Cross-species Model of Dual-Task Walking in Young and Older Humans and Rats.

Authors:  Abbi R Hernandez; Steven P Winesett; Quinten P Federico; Sonora A Williams; Sara N Burke; David J Clark
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 4.  Predictive Validity of Motor Fitness and Flexibility Tests in Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nuria Marín-Jiménez; Carolina Cruz-León; Alejandro Perez-Bey; Julio Conde-Caveda; Alberto Grao-Cruces; Virginia A Aparicio; José Castro-Piñero; Magdalena Cuenca-García
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.