Literature DB >> 32086690

Outcome of retreatment for recurrent saccular cerebral aneurysms: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Hidetoshi Matsukawa1, Rokuya Tanikawa2, Hiroyasu Kamiyama2, Kosumo Noda2, Kazutaka Uchida1, Manabu Shirakawa1, Shinichi Yoshimura3.   

Abstract

Although endovascular or surgical treatment has been performed for preventing the rupture of saccular cerebral aneurysms (sCA), in some patients, the aneurysms may recur and require retreatment. We aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of treating recurrent sCA. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 52 patients with 60 recurrent sCAs who were retreated and 1534 patients with 1817 sCAs who received initial treatment. The primary outcome was a recurrence of the aneurysm. Secondary outcomes were an additional treatment, rupture after treatment, and a neurological worsening, which was defined as an increase of 1 or more scores using the modified Rankin Scale at 12-month. Safety outcomes included postoperative ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. We compiled the 120 (60 each) propensity score-matched cohort based on a propensity score for the treatment of recurrent sCA. In the propensity score-matched cohort, recurrence after treatment was observed in 25% and 6.7% of cases in the retreatment and initial treatment groups, respectively. The odds ratio of recurrence after treatment was 4.7 (95% CI, 1.4-15; P = 0.011). The secondary and safety outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. This study showed that the treatment of recurrent sCA was a risk factor for recurrence after treatment but not for additional treatment, rupture after treatment, or neurological worsening. Although decision-making regarding the treatment varies depending on the institutional protocols and personal experience of the physicians, endovascular or surgical retreatment could be performed without hesitation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endovascular treatment; Outcome; Recurrent saccular cerebral aneurysm; Retreatment; Risk factors; Surgical treatment

Year:  2020        PMID: 32086690     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01259-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  22 in total

Review 1.  Ready or not, here they come: randomized trials evaluating new endovascular aneurysm therapies.

Authors:  D F Kallmes; H J Cloft
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Use of flow-diverting stents as salvage treatment following failed stent-assisted embolization of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Daniel M Heiferman; Joshua T Billingsley; Manish K Kasliwal; Andrew K Johnson; Kiffon M Keigher; Michel E Frudit; Roham Moftakhar; Demetrius K Lopes
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.836

Review 3.  Advances in open microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Jason M Davies; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Endovascular coil embolization after clipping: endovascular treatment of incompletely clipped or recurred cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Jaehwan Chung; In Sung Park; Hyun Park; Soo-Hyun Hwang; Jin-Myung Jung; Jong-Woo Han
Journal:  J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  Observer agreement regarding the necessity of retreatment of previously coiled recurrent cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  W P Daugherty; A Ehteshami Rad; J B White; P M Meyers; G L Lanzino; H J Cloft; J Gordon; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Management of residual and recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment.

Authors:  Christian Dorfer; Andreas Gruber; Harald Standhardt; Gerhard Bavinzski; Engelbert Knosp
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Repeated endovascular coil occlusion in 350 of 2759 intracranial aneurysms: safety and effectiveness aspects.

Authors:  Hans Henkes; Sebastian Fischer; Thomas Liebig; Werner Weber; Jörg Reinartz; Elina Miloslavski; Dietmar Kühne
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Waleed Brinjikji; Giuseppe Lanzino; Harry J Cloft; Alejandro Rabinstein; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms.

Authors:  Nohra Chalouhi; Stavropoula Tjoumakaris; Robert M Starke; L Fernando Gonzalez; Ciro Randazzo; David Hasan; Jeffrey F McMahon; Saurabh Singhal; Lea A Moukarzel; Aaron S Dumont; Robert Rosenwasser; Pascal Jabbour
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.