| Literature DB >> 32086560 |
Kyoko Abe1, Takashi Horiguchi2, Keiji Enzan3, Yoko Masaki4, Toshiaki Nishikawa4, Tetsu Kimura4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Nicorandil is a hybrid between nitrates and KATP channel opener activators. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nicorandil's effects on ischemia-reperfusion (IR) lung injury and examine the mechanism of its effects.Entities:
Keywords: Ischemia–reperfusion injury; KATP channel opener; Lung; Nicorandil; Nitrate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32086560 PMCID: PMC7223246 DOI: 10.1007/s00408-020-00339-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lung ISSN: 0341-2040 Impact factor: 2.584
Fig. 1Schematic presentation of the experimental setup. Arterial and venous reservoirs are elevated simultaneously by 6 cmH2O during measurement of the coefficient of filtration (Kfc). The pump continuously circles the perfusate from the venous reservoir to the arterial reservoir to maintain a constant driving pressure. AD analog-to-digital, LA left atrium, PA pulmonary artery, Paw airway pressure, Ppa pulmonary arterial pressure, Ppv pulmonary venous pressure
Fig. 2Experimental protocol. M1, baseline measurement microvascular permeability to water (Kfc); M2, Kfc measurement 30 min after reperfusion; M3, Kfc measurement 60 min after reperfusion. Ischemia indicates no ventilation without perfusion, while reperfusion restoration of ventilation and perfusion
Gas analyses of perfusate
| Group | PH | PCO2 (mmHg) | PO2 (mmHg) | BE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IR | 7.404 ± 0.068 | 26.5 ± 4.3 | 146.1 ± 10.6 | − 6.1 ± 2.9 |
| N + IR | 7.434 ± 0.084 | 25.2 ± 3.6 | 152.3 ± 8.3 | − 6.1 ± 2.9 |
| Gli + N + IR | 7.427 ± 0.066 | 27.1 ± 4.6 | 143.2 ± 8.0 | − 5.9 ± 2.2 |
| ODQ + N + IR | 7.371 ± 0.022 | 29.4 ± 2.0 | 146.4 ± 2.6 | − 6.7 ± 3.8 |
| L-NAME + N + IR | 7.395 ± 0.035 | 25.6 ± 2.3 | 142.7 ± 5.1 | − 7.3 ± 2.3 |
| Sham | 7.386 ± 0.029 | 26.6 ± 2.8 | 148.1 ± 6.6 | − 6.9 ± 1.7 |
Data are mean ± SD (n = 6 per group). BE = base excess
There were no significant differences among groups
Changes in the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR)
| Group | Baseline | 30 min | 60 min |
|---|---|---|---|
| IR | 488 ± 68 | 547 ± 95 | 642 ± 94 |
| N + IR | 477 ± 26 | 550 ± 69 | 580 ± 121 |
| Glb + N + IR | 534 ± 23 | 557 ± 120 | 580 ± 58 |
| ODQ + N + IR | 512 ± 68 | 554 ± 75 | 615 ± 150 |
| L-NAME + N + IR | 515 ± 62 | 582 ± 105 | 628 ± 149 |
| Sham | 470 ± 97 | 556 ± 91 | 593 ± 119 |
Data are mean ± SD in mmHg l−1 min−1 (n = 6 per group). There were no significant differences among groups in PVR values at the baseline and the end of the reperfusion
Fig. 3Changes in the coefficient of filtration (Kfc). Data are mean ± SD (n = 6 per group). Open squares = IR group; closed squares = N + IR group; open triangles = Glb + N + IR group; closed triangles = ODQ + N + IR group; open circles = L-NAME + N + IR group; closed circles = sham group. *P < 0.01 versus baseline. #P < 0.01 versus IR group at the end of reperfusion
Fig. 4Changes in lung wet-to-dry weight ratio. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6 per group). *P < 0.01 versus sham group. #P < 0.01 versus IR group