Literature DB >> 32086346

Non-BRCA DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations and Response to the PARP Inhibitor Rucaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Analysis From the Phase II TRITON2 Study.

Wassim Abida1, David Campbell2, Akash Patnaik3, Jeremy D Shapiro4, Brieuc Sautois5, Nicholas J Vogelzang6, Eric G Voog7, Alan H Bryce8, Ray McDermott9, Francesco Ricci10, Julie Rowe11, Jingsong Zhang12, Josep Maria Piulats13, Karim Fizazi14, Axel S Merseburger15, Celestia S Higano16, Laurence E Krieger17, Charles J Ryan18, Felix Y Feng19, Andrew D Simmons20, Andrea Loehr20, Darrin Despain21, Melanie Dowson22, Foad Green20, Simon P Watkins23, Tony Golsorkhi24, Simon Chowdhury25.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Genomic alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes other than BRCA may confer synthetic lethality with PARP inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To test this hypothesis, the phase II TRITON2 study of rucaparib included patients with mCRPC and deleterious non-BRCA DDR gene alterations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TRITON2 enrolled patients who had progressed on one or two lines of next-generation androgen receptor-directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Key endpoints were investigator-assessed radiographic response per modified RECIST/PCWG3 and PSA response (≥50% decrease from baseline).
RESULTS: TRITON2 enrolled 78 patients with a non-BRCA DDR gene alteration [ATM (n = 49), CDK12 (n = 15), CHEK2 (n = 12), and other DDR genes (n = 14)]. Among patients evaluable for each endpoint, radiographic and PSA responses were observed in a limited number of patients with an alteration in ATM [2/19 (10.5%) and 2/49 (4.1%), respectively], CDK12 [0/10 (0%) and 1/15 (6.7%), respectively], or CHEK2 [1/9 (11.1%) and 2/12 (16.7%), respectively], including no radiographic or PSA responses in 11 patients with confirmed biallelic ATM loss or 11 patients with ATM germline mutations. Responses were observed in patients with alterations in the DDR genes PALB2, FANCA, BRIP1, and RAD51B.
CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, genomics-driven study of rucaparib in mCRPC, we found limited radiographic/PSA responses to PARP inhibition in men with alterations in ATM, CDK12, or CHEK2. However, patients with alterations in other DDR-associated genes (e.g., PALB2) may benefit from PARP inhibition.See related commentary by Sokolova et al., p. 2439. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32086346     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  94 in total

1.  Two Steps Forward and One Step Back for Precision in Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Michael T Schweizer; Heather H Cheng; Peter S Nelson; R Bruce Montgomery
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  BRCA1 Versus BRCA2 and PARP Inhibitor Sensitivity in Prostate Cancer: More Different Than Alike?

Authors:  Mark C Markowski; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Pan-cancer Analysis of CDK12 Alterations Identifies a Subset of Prostate Cancers with Distinct Genomic and Clinical Characteristics.

Authors:  Bastien Nguyen; Jose Mauricio Mota; Subhiksha Nandakumar; Konrad H Stopsack; Emily Weg; Dana Rathkopf; Michael J Morris; Howard I Scher; Philip W Kantoff; Anuradha Gopalan; Dmitriy Zamarin; David B Solit; Nikolaus Schultz; Wassim Abida
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Next-Generation Androgen Receptor-Signaling Inhibitors for Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Older Patients.

Authors:  Zizhen Feng; Julie N Graff
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  CDK12-Altered Prostate Cancer: Clinical Features and Therapeutic Outcomes to Standard Systemic Therapies, Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, and PD-1 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Wei Fu; Hao Wang; Neeraj Agarwal; Victor Sacristan Santos; Benjamin L Maughan; Roberto Pili; Nabil Adra; Cora N Sternberg; Panagiotis J Vlachostergios; Scott T Tagawa; Alan H Bryce; Andrea L McNatty; Zachery R Reichert; Robert Dreicer; Oliver Sartor; Tamara L Lotan; Maha Hussain
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-04-21

6.  Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer With DNA Repair Gene Alterations.

Authors:  Jose Mauricio Mota; Ethan Barnett; Jones T Nauseef; Bastien Nguyen; Konrad H Stopsack; Andreas Wibmer; Jessica R Flynn; Glenn Heller; Daniel C Danila; Dana Rathkopf; Susan Slovin; Philip W Kantoff; Howard I Scher; Michael J Morris; Nikolaus Schultz; David B Solit; Wassim Abida
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-04-16

7.  Exploiting defects in homologous recombination repair for metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Chau; Ravi A Madan; William D Figg
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.742

8.  Honing in on PARPi Response in Prostate Cancer: from HR Pathway to Gene-by-Gene Granularity.

Authors:  Alexandra O Sokolova; Evan Y Yu; Heather H Cheng
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Management of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following potent androgen receptor inhibition: a review of novel investigational therapies.

Authors:  Matthew K Labriola; Saad Atiq; Nathan Hirshman; Rhonda L Bitting
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Efficacy of PARP Inhibition in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer is Very Different with Non-BRCA DNA Repair Alterations: Reconstructing Prespecified Endpoints for Cohort B from the Phase 3 PROfound Trial of Olaparib.

Authors:  Konrad H Stopsack
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.