Janna Ataiants1, Alexis M Roth2, Silvana Mazzella3, Stephen E Lankenau2. 1. Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: ja633@drexel.edu. 2. Department of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. 3. Prevention Point Philadelphia, 2913 Kensington Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19134, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Current discourses about the causes of the overdose crisis largely focus on the harmful effects of drugs. Prior research, however, indicates that drug use experience is shaped by complex interactions of drugs with physiological and mental "sets" of people who use drugs and the wider social and physical "setting." Zinberg's "drug, set, and setting" theoretical framework was applied to identify patterns in circumstances leading up to women's overdose. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 opioid-injecting street-involved women, clients of a Philadelphia harm reduction program. Qualitative analysis with deductive and inductive coding was utilized to examine transcripts for theory-driven and emerging themes. RESULTS: Ten out of 29 women attributed their overdose to "drugs," reporting the unpredictable quality of street opioids, concurrent use of benzodiazepines, or chasing the "high." Thirteen women reported "set" as a type of circumstance where their emotional states were affected by a "good" or "bad" day, leading them to unusual drug consumption practices. Six women described "setting" type of circumstances where their overdose was preceded by a recent change in context, such as release from prison, which prompted unsafe drug use to address physiological or psychological dependence on drugs. CONCLUSION: While all overdoses result from the pharmacological action of drugs, some overdoses were triggered by circumstances occurring in women's set or setting. Overdose prevention policies should embrace not only individual-level behavioral interventions, but also structural measures to address stress, social isolation, and risky drug use contexts that plague the lives of street-involved women who inject opioids.
INTRODUCTION: Current discourses about the causes of the overdose crisis largely focus on the harmful effects of drugs. Prior research, however, indicates that drug use experience is shaped by complex interactions of drugs with physiological and mental "sets" of people who use drugs and the wider social and physical "setting." Zinberg's "drug, set, and setting" theoretical framework was applied to identify patterns in circumstances leading up to women's overdose. METHODS: In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 opioid-injecting street-involved women, clients of a Philadelphia harm reduction program. Qualitative analysis with deductive and inductive coding was utilized to examine transcripts for theory-driven and emerging themes. RESULTS: Ten out of 29 women attributed their overdose to "drugs," reporting the unpredictable quality of street opioids, concurrent use of benzodiazepines, or chasing the "high." Thirteen women reported "set" as a type of circumstance where their emotional states were affected by a "good" or "bad" day, leading them to unusual drug consumption practices. Six women described "setting" type of circumstances where their overdose was preceded by a recent change in context, such as release from prison, which prompted unsafe drug use to address physiological or psychological dependence on drugs. CONCLUSION: While all overdoses result from the pharmacological action of drugs, some overdoses were triggered by circumstances occurring in women's set or setting. Overdose prevention policies should embrace not only individual-level behavioral interventions, but also structural measures to address stress, social isolation, and risky drug use contexts that plague the lives of street-involved women who inject opioids.
Authors: Sarah G Mars; Jason N Fessel; Philippe Bourgois; Fernando Montero; George Karandinos; Daniel Ciccarone Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Travis P Baggett; Stephen W Hwang; James J O'Connell; Bianca C Porneala; Erin J Stringfellow; E John Orav; Daniel E Singer; Nancy A Rigotti Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-02-11 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Denise A Hien; Elizabeth A Wells; Huiping Jiang; Lourdes Suarez-Morales; Aimee N C Campbell; Lisa R Cohen; Gloria M Miele; Therese Killeen; Gregory S Brigham; Yulei Zhang; Cheri Hansen; Candace Hodgkins; Mary Hatch-Maillette; Chanda Brown; Agatha Kulaga; Allison Kristman-Valente; Melissa Chu; Robert Sage; James A Robinson; David Liu; Edward V Nunes Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2009-08
Authors: Brandy F Henry; Amar D Mandavia; Margaret M Paschen-Wolff; Timothy Hunt; Jennifer L Humensky; Elwin Wu; Harold A Pincus; Edward V Nunes; Frances R Levin; Nabila El-Bassel Journal: Psychol Trauma Date: 2020-06-18
Authors: Christopher M Jones; Mamadou M Diallo; Meena Vythilingam; Joshua G Schier; Matthew Eisenstat; Wilson M Compton Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2021-05-23 Impact factor: 4.852
Authors: David G Schwartz; Janna Ataiants; Alexis Roth; Gabriela Marcu; Inbal Yahav; Benjamin Cocchiaro; Michael Khalemsky; Stephen Lankenau Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2020-08-03