Literature DB >> 32086102

Evaluation of potential environmental toxicity of polymeric nanomaterials and surfactants.

Indra Hering1, Elke Eilebrecht2, Michael J Parnham3, Nazende Günday-Türeli4, Akif Emre Türeli4, Marc Weiler4, Christoph Schäfers2, Martina Fenske5, Matthias G Wacker6.   

Abstract

Nanomaterials have gained huge importance in various fields including nanomedicine. Nanoformulations of drugs and nanocarriers are used to increase pharmaceutical potency. However, it was seen that polymeric nanomaterials can cause negative effects. Thus, it is essential to identify nanomaterials with the least adverse effects on aquatic organisms. To determine the toxicity of polymeric nanomaterials, we investigated the effects of poly(lactic-co-glycolid) acid (PLGA), Eudragit® E 100 and hydroxylpropyl methylcellulose phthalate (HPMCP) on zebrafish embryos using the fish embryo toxicity test (FET). Furthermore, we studied Cremophor® RH40, Cremophor® A25, Pluronic® F127 and Pluronic® F68 applied in the generation of nanoformulations to identify the surfactant with minimal toxic impact. The order of ecotoxicty was HPMCP < PLGA < Eudragit® E100 and Pluronic® F68 < Pluronic® F127 < Cremophor® RH40 < Cremophor® A25. In summary, HPMCP and Pluronic® F68 displayed the least toxic impact, thus suggesting adequate environmental compatibility for the generation of nanomedicines.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Danio rerio; Ecotoxicity; Nanomaterials; Polymers; Surfactants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32086102     DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2020.103353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 1382-6689            Impact factor:   4.860


  6 in total

1.  Surfactants influence polymer nanoparticle fate within the brain.

Authors:  Andrea Joseph; Georges Motchoffo Simo; Torahito Gao; Norah Alhindi; Nuo Xu; Daniel J Graham; Lara J Gamble; Elizabeth Nance
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 15.304

Review 2.  Recent advances in nanoplatforms for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Beibei Yu; Kunzhe Wu; Xiaohua Xu; Yan Liu; Jinlan Jiang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.473

3.  Development and implementation of a simple and rapid extraction-free saliva SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP workflow for workplace surveillance.

Authors:  Zhiru Li; Jacqueline L Bruce; Barry Cohen; Caileigh V Cunningham; William E Jack; Katell Kunin; Bradley W Langhorst; Jacob Miller; Reynes A Moncion; Catherine B Poole; Prem K Premsrirut; Guoping Ren; Richard J Roberts; Nathan A Tanner; Yinhua Zhang; Clotilde K S Carlow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Superstable Wet Foams and Lightweight Solid Composites from Nanocellulose and Hydrophobic Particles.

Authors:  Roozbeh Abidnejad; Marco Beaumont; Blaise L Tardy; Bruno D Mattos; Orlando J Rojas
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 18.027

5.  Sustainable Stabilizer-Free Nanoparticle Formulations of Valsartan Using Eudragit® RLPO.

Authors:  Eszter Hajba-Horváth; Andrea Fodor-Kardos; Nishant Shah; Matthias G Wacker; Tivadar Feczkó
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Biocompatibility Study of Curcumin-Loaded Pluronic F127 Nanoformulation (NanoCUR) against the Embryonic Development of Zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Siti Nur Sharmila Abdullah; Kalai Arasu Subramaniam; Zahir Haizat Muhamad Zamani; Seri Narti Edayu Sarchio; Faizah Md Yasin; Suhaili Shamsi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.927

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.