Literature DB >> 32086069

Improved methodology to determine the fate and transport of microplastics in a secondary wastewater treatment plant.

Subash Raju1, Maddison Carbery2, Aswin Kuttykattil2, Kala Senthirajah3, Anna Lundmark4, Zoe Rogers4, Suresh Scb2, Geoffrey Evans5, Thava Palanisami6.   

Abstract

Wastewater treatment plants are a significant pathway of microplastics (MPs) to aquatic environments. To develop suitable management options and reduce microplastic emissions in treated effluent and sludge, we must first develop a reliable method to understand their transport and fate throughout the treatment process. An improved methodology was applied to determine the size, shape, polymer type and partitioning behaviour of MPs using a combination of oxidation treatment, fluorescent staining and Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) to detect small MPs ≤20 μm in wastewater. The mean number of MPs (<5 mm) detected using this methodology was 11.80 ± 1.10 MP/L in raw sewage, 5.23 ± 0.25 MP/L in degritted wastewater, 7.91 ± 0.44 MP/L in waste activated sludge and 2.76 ± 0.11 MP/L in the final treated effluent. An increase in MPs following primary screening suggests that WAS is a sink for several stealth microplastics, including glitter, which is returned to the effluent during the treatment process. The estimated MP removal efficiency for the studied WWTP is relatively poor compared with global data for secondary WWTPs, which is likely due to the release of partially treated effluent into the Pacific Ocean via a second discharge point. The information generated through this study can be useful to; firstly, inform on-site wastewater management practices, and secondly, reduce MP concentrations in final treated effluents discharged to the marine environment.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glitter; Methodology; Microplastics; Secondary treatment; Sludge; Wastewater

Year:  2020        PMID: 32086069     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  4 in total

1.  Optimising sample preparation for FTIR-based microplastic analysis in wastewater and sludge samples: multiple digestions.

Authors:  Serena Cunsolo; John Williams; Michelle Hale; Daniel S Read; Fay Couceiro
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  A comprehensive review on comparison among effluent treatment methods and modern methods of treatment of industrial wastewater effluent from different sources.

Authors:  K Sathya; K Nagarajan; G Carlin Geor Malar; S Rajalakshmi; P Raja Lakshmi
Journal:  Appl Water Sci       Date:  2022-03-21

3.  Microplastics in Sediments of East Surabaya, Indonesia: Regional Characteristics and Potential Risks.

Authors:  Achmad Chusnun Ni'am; Fahir Hassan; Ruei-Feng Shiu; Jheng-Jie Jiang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Seasonal variation and complex analysis of microplastic distribution in different WWTP treatment stages in Lithuania.

Authors:  Ieva Uogintė; Sonata Pleskytė; Julija Pauraitė; Galina Lujanienė
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 3.307

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.