Literature DB >> 32085925

Salvage lymphadenectomy in recurrent ovarian cancer patients: Analysis of clinical outcome and BRCA1/2 gene mutational status.

V Gallotta1, M Bruno2, C Conte3, M T Giudice2, F Davià2, F Moro3, G F Zannoni4, A Fagotti2, M De Bonis5, E Capoluongo6, G Scambia2, G Ferrandina2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed to analyze the clinical outcome of recurrent ovarian cancer patients bearing isolated lymph-node recurrence (ILNR) who underwent salvage lymphadenectomy (SL). The prognostic role of clinicopathological variables and the mutational status of BRCA1/2 have also been investigated.
METHODS: This retrospective, single-institutional study included women with platinum-sensitive lymph node recurrence underwent to SL between June 2008 and June 2018. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of clinical parameters, and BRCA1/2 mutational status on post salvage lymphadenectomy progression-free survival (PSL-PFS).
RESULTS: As of June 2019, the median follow-up after SL was 30 months, and the relapse has been documented in 48 (56.5%) patients. In the whole series, the median PSL-PFS was 21 months, and the 3-year PSL-PFS was 36.7%. The median PSL-PFS, according to patients with ILNR (N = 71) versus patients with lymph-nodes and other sites of disease (N = 14), was 27 months versus 12 months, respectively. Univariate analysis of variables conditioning PSL-PFS showed that platinum-free interval (PFI) ≥12 months, normal Ca125 serum levels, and number of metastatic lymph-nodes ≤3 played a statistically significant favorable role. In multivariate analysis, PFI duration ≥12 months and the number of metastatic lymph nodes ≤3 were shown to keep their favorable, independent prognostic value on PSL-PFS.
CONCLUSIONS: In the context of SL, the patients with long PFI and low metastatic lymph node numbers at ILNR diagnosis have the best outcome. The BRCA mutational status seems not associated with clinical variables and PSL-PFS, differently from other sites of disease in ROC patients.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lymph node metastasis; Lymphadenectomy; Personalized medicine; Precision oncologic surgery; Recurrent ovarian cancer; Secondary cytoreduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32085925     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  15 in total

Review 1.  Laparotomy vs. minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer recurrence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Massimo P Franchi; Stefano Cianci; Pier Carlo Zorzato; Francesca Bertoli; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Fabio Ghezzi; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

2.  Minimally Invasive Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Superficial Celiac and Cardio-Phrenic Isolated Nodal Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  M Loverro; R Ergasti; C Conte; V Gallitelli; D Nachira; G Scaglione; A Fagotti; G Scambia; V Gallotta
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Prognostic factors for survival in patients with lung metastases from gynaecological tract cancers.

Authors:  Marco Chiappetta; Valerio Gallotta; Luca Pogliani; Edoardo Zanfrini; Anna Fagotti; Gabriella Ferrandina; Francesco Fanfani; Dania Nachira; Elisa Meacci; Maria Teresa Congedo; Filippo Lococo; Maria Teresa Giudice; Giovanni Scambia; Stefano Margaritora
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-03

4.  Conditional Relative Survival of Ovarian Cancer: A Korean National Cancer Registry Study.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jaeman Bae; Johyun Ha; Kyu-Won Jung
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  A Prediction Model for Optimal Primary Debulking Surgery Based on Preoperative Computed Tomography Scans and Clinical Factors in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yu Gu; Meng Qin; Ying Jin; Jing Zuo; Ning Li; Ce Bian; Yu Zhang; Rong Li; Yu-Mei Wu; Chun-Yan Wang; Ke-Qiang Zhang; Ying Yue; Ling-Ying Wu; Ling-Ya Pan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Development of a Genomic Signatures-Based Predictor of Initial Platinum-Resistance in Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Xiaolan Zhang; Yan Gao; Chunliang Shang; Bo Yu; Tongxia Wang; Junyan Su; Cuiyu Huang; Yu Wu; Hongyan Guo; Chunfang Ha
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Development of a Prognostic Model for Ovarian Cancer Patients Based on Novel Immune Microenvironment Related Genes.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Qianqian Wu; Ziheng Wang; Shiqi Ren; Hanyu Shen; Wenyu Shi; Yunzhao Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Surgical Outcomes of Transperitoneal Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy Compared With Extraperitoneal Approach in Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kun-Peng Li; Xian-Zhong Deng; Tao Wu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-12-21

9.  Which patients on a gynecologic oncology service will require perioperative transfusion? A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gregory W Kirschen; Samantha M Dayton; Sophia Blakey-Cheung; Michael L Pearl
Journal:  Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 0.146

10.  Molecular Profiling Reveals Common and Specific Development Processes in Different Types of Gynecologic Cancers.

Authors:  Yuanli Guo; Junfeng Liu; Jiaqi Luo; Xiaobin You; Hui Weng; Minyi Wang; Ting Ouyang; Xiao Li; Xiaoming Liao; Maocai Wang; Zhaoji Lan; Yujian Shi; Shan Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.