| Literature DB >> 32085782 |
Lenhard Pennig1, Anton Wagner2, Kilian Weiss3, Simon Lennartz2,4, Jan-Peter Grunz5, David Maintz2, Kai Roman Laukamp2, Tilman Hickethier2, Claas Philip Naehle2, Alexander Christian Bunck2, Jonas Doerner2.
Abstract
The original publication of this article [1], contained graphical errors in Figs. 1 and 2. This does not impact the display of the mean differences of the Bland-Altman plots. The updated figures (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2) are published in this correction article.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32085782 PMCID: PMC7033936 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-020-00606-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Fig. 1Bland–Altman comparison of the measured diameters of the pulmonary arteries assessed by modified REACT-non-CE-MRA and 4D CE-MRA. The middle line indicates the mean bias of the diameter measurements whereas the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Values are given in mm
Fig. 2Bland–Altman comparison of the measured diameters of the pulmonary veins assessed by modified REACT-non-CE-MRA and 4D CE-MRA. The middle line indicates the mean bias of the diameter measurements whereas the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Values are given in mm