Danielle Golub1, Jonathan Hyde1, Siddhant Dogra2, Joseph Nicholson3, Katherine A Kirkwood4, Paulomi Gohel1, Stephen Loftus5, Theodore H Schwartz6. 1. Departments of1Neurosurgery and. 2. 2Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 3. 3NYU Health Sciences Library, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York. 4. 4Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 5. 5Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Math, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, Virginia. 6. 6Departments of Neurosurgery, Otolaryngology, and Neuroscience, Weill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; and.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) continue to carry poor prognoses, and patient outcomes depend heavily on the extent of resection (EOR). The utility of conventional image-guided surgery is limited by intraoperative brain shift. More recent techniques to maximize EOR, including intraoperative imaging and the use of fluorescent dyes, combat these limitations. However, the relative efficacy of these two techniques has never been systematically compared. Thus, the authors performed an exhaustive systematic review in conjunction with quantitative network meta-analyses to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and intraoperative MRI (IMRI) in optimizing EOR in HGG. They secondarily analyzed associated progression-free and overall survival and performed subgroup analyses by level of evidence. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science were searched for studies evaluating conventional neuronavigation, IMRI, and 5-ALA in HGG resection. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients attaining gross-total resection (GTR), defined as 100% elimination of contrast-enhancing lesion on postoperative MRI. Secondary endpoints included overall and progression-free survival and subgroup analyses for level of evidence. Comparative efficacy analysis of IMRI and 5-ALA was performed using Bayesian network meta-analysis models. RESULTS: This analysis included 11 studies. In a classic meta-analysis, both IMRI (OR 4.99, 95% CI 2.65-9.39, p < 0.001) and 5-ALA (OR 2.866, 95% CI 2.127-3.863, p < 0.001) were superior to conventional navigation in achieving GTR. Bayesian network analysis was employed to indirectly compare IMRI to 5-ALA, and no significant difference in GTR was found between the two (OR 1.9 favoring IMRI, 95% CI 0.905-3.989, p = 0.090). A handful of studies additionally suggested that the use of either IMRI (2 and 4 studies, respectively) or 5-ALA (2 and 2 studies, respectively) improves progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: IMRI and 5-ALA are individually superior to conventional neuronavigation for achieving GTR of HGG. Between IMRI and 5-ALA, neither method is clearly more effective. Future studies evaluating the comparative cost and surgical time associated with IMRI and 5-ALA will better inform any cost-benefit analysis.
OBJECTIVE: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) continue to carry poor prognoses, and patient outcomes depend heavily on the extent of resection (EOR). The utility of conventional image-guided surgery is limited by intraoperative brain shift. More recent techniques to maximize EOR, including intraoperative imaging and the use of fluorescent dyes, combat these limitations. However, the relative efficacy of these two techniques has never been systematically compared. Thus, the authors performed an exhaustive systematic review in conjunction with quantitative network meta-analyses to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) and intraoperative MRI (IMRI) in optimizing EOR in HGG. They secondarily analyzed associated progression-free and overall survival and performed subgroup analyses by level of evidence. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science were searched for studies evaluating conventional neuronavigation, IMRI, and 5-ALA in HGG resection. The primary study endpoint was the proportion of patients attaining gross-total resection (GTR), defined as 100% elimination of contrast-enhancing lesion on postoperative MRI. Secondary endpoints included overall and progression-free survival and subgroup analyses for level of evidence. Comparative efficacy analysis of IMRI and 5-ALA was performed using Bayesian network meta-analysis models. RESULTS: This analysis included 11 studies. In a classic meta-analysis, both IMRI (OR 4.99, 95% CI 2.65-9.39, p < 0.001) and 5-ALA (OR 2.866, 95% CI 2.127-3.863, p < 0.001) were superior to conventional navigation in achieving GTR. Bayesian network analysis was employed to indirectly compare IMRI to 5-ALA, and no significant difference in GTR was found between the two (OR 1.9 favoring IMRI, 95% CI 0.905-3.989, p = 0.090). A handful of studies additionally suggested that the use of either IMRI (2 and 4 studies, respectively) or 5-ALA (2 and 2 studies, respectively) improves progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: IMRI and 5-ALA are individually superior to conventional neuronavigation for achieving GTR of HGG. Between IMRI and 5-ALA, neither method is clearly more effective. Future studies evaluating the comparative cost and surgical time associated with IMRI and 5-ALA will better inform any cost-benefit analysis.
Authors: Tiara S Napier; Neha Udayakumar; Aditi H Jani; Yolanda E Hartman; Hailey A Houson; Lindsay Moore; Hope M Amm; Nynke S van den Berg; Anna G Sorace; Jason M Warram Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Tizian Rosenstock; Paul Pöser; David Wasilewski; Hans-Christian Bauknecht; Ulrike Grittner; Thomas Picht; Martin Misch; Julia Sophie Onken; Peter Vajkoczy Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-05-16 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Daniel M Fountain; Andrew Bryant; Damiano Giuseppe Barone; Mueez Waqar; Michael G Hart; Helen Bulbeck; Ashleigh Kernohan; Colin Watts; Michael D Jenkinson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-01-04
Authors: Anjali Pradhan; Khashayar Mozaffari; Farinaz Ghodrati; Richard G Everson; Isaac Yang Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 4.506