Literature DB >> 32084598

Molecular interactions and forces of adhesion between single human neural stem cells and gelatin methacrylate hydrogels of varying stiffness.

Christina Puckert1, Eva Tomaskovic-Crook1, Sanjeev Gambhir1, Gordon G Wallace1, Jeremy M Crook1, Michael J Higgins2.   

Abstract

Single Cell Force Spectroscopy was applied to measure the single cell de-adhesion between human neural stem cells (hNSC) and gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) hydrogel with varying modulus in the range equivalent to brain tissue. The cell de-adhesion force and energy were predominately generated via unbinding of complexes formed between RGD groups of the GelMA and cell surface integrin receptors and the de-adhesion force/energy were found to increase with decreasing modulus of the GelMA hydrogel. For the softer GelMA hydrogels (160 Pa and 450 Pa) it was proposed that a lower degree of cross-linking enables a greater number of polymer chains to bind and freely extend to increase the force and energy of the hNSC-GelMA de-adhesion. In this case, the multiple polymer chains are believed to act together in parallel like 'molecular tensors' to generate tensile forces on the bound receptors until the cell detaches. Counterintuitively for softer substrates, this type of interaction gave rise to higher force loading rates, including the appearance of high and low dynamic force regimes in de-adhesion rupture force versus loading rate analysis. For the stiffer GelMA hydrogel (900 Pa) it was observed that the extension and elastic restoring forces of the polymer chains contributed less to the cell de-adhesion. Due to the apparent lower extent of freely interacting chains on the stiffer GelMA hydrogel the intrinsic RGD groups are presumed to be "more fixed" to the substrate. Hence, the cell de-adhesion is suggested to be mainly governed by the discrete unbinding of integrin-RGD complexes as opposed to elastic restoring forces of polymer chains, leading to smaller piconewton rupture forces and only a single lower dynamic force regime. Intriguingly, when integrin antibodies were introduced for binding integrin α5β1, β1- and αv-subunits it was revealed that the cell modifies the de-adhesion force depending on the substrate stiffness. The antibody binding supressed the de-adhesion on the softer GelMA hydrogel while on the stiffer GelMA hydrogel caused an opposing reinforcement in the de-adhesion. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Conceptual models on cell mechanosensing have provided molecular-level insight to rationalize the effects of substrate stiffness. However most experimental studies evaluate the cell adhesion by analysing the bulk material properties. As such there is a discrepancy in the scale between the bulk properties versus the nano- and micro-scale cell interactions. Furthermore there is a paucity of experimental studies on directly measuring the molecular-level forces of cell-material interactions. Here we apply Single Cell Force Spectroscopy to directly measure the adhesion forces between human neural stem cells and gelatin-methacrylate hydrogel. We elucidate the mechanisms by which single cells bind and physically interact with hydrogels of varying stiffness. The study highlights the use of single cell analysis tools to probe molecular-level interactions at the cell-material interface which is of importance in designing material cues for regulating cell function.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atomic force microscopy (AFM); Cell adhesion; Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA); Neural stem cell; Single cell force spectroscopy (SCFS)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32084598     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  9 in total

1.  Use of FLOSEAL® as a scaffold and its impact on induced neural stem cell phenotype, persistence, and efficacy.

Authors:  Hunter N Bomba; Abigail Carey-Ewend; Kevin T Sheets; Alain Valdivia; Morgan Goetz; Ingrid A Findlay; Alison Mercer-Smith; Lauren E Kass; Simon Khagi; Shawn D Hingtgen
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2022-01-21

2.  Engineering new microvascular networks on-chip: ingredients, assembly, and best practices.

Authors:  James J Tronolone; Abhishek Jain
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 18.808

3.  Investigating the Regulation of Neural Differentiation and Injury in PC12 Cells Using Microstructure Topographic Cues.

Authors:  Xindi Sun; Wei Li; Xiuqing Gong; Guohui Hu; Junyi Ge; Jinbo Wu; Xinghua Gao
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-16

4.  Advancing cell instructive biomaterials through increased understanding of cell receptor spacing and material surface functionalization.

Authors:  Stephanie A Maynard; Charles W Winter; Eoghan M Cunnane; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2020-11-20

5.  Tuning the Cell-Adhesive Properties of Two-Component Hybrid Hydrogels to Modulate Cancer Cell Behavior, Metastasis, and Death Pathways.

Authors:  Melis Isik; Babatunde O Okesola; Cemil Can Eylem; Engin Kocak; Emirhan Nemutlu; Emel Emregul; Matteo D'Este; Burak Derkus
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 6.978

6.  Property-Tuneable Microgels Fabricated by Using Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Geometry for Bioactive Agent Delivery.

Authors:  Wing-Fu Lai; Wing-Tak Wong
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 6.321

7.  Nanoscale Molecular Quantification of Stem Cell-Hydrogel Interactions.

Authors:  Stephanie A Maynard; Amy Gelmi; Stacey C Skaalure; Isaac J Pence; Charlotte Lee-Reeves; Julia E Sero; Thomas E Whittaker; Molly M Stevens
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 15.881

8.  Human Salivary Histatin-1-Functionalized Gelatin Methacrylate Hydrogels Promote the Regeneration of Cartilage and Subchondral Bone in Temporomandibular Joints.

Authors:  Changjing Shi; Yu Yao; Lei Wang; Ping Sun; Jianying Feng; Gang Wu
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Mechanical and medical imaging properties of 3D-printed materials as tissue equivalent materials.

Authors:  Depeng Ma; Ronghui Gao; Minghui Li; Jianfeng Qiu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.