Literature DB >> 32083837

CD73 or CD39 Deletion Reveals Different Mechanisms of Formation for Spontaneous and Mechanically Stimulated Adenosine and Sex Specific Compensations in ATP Degradation.

Ying Wang1, Jeffrey Copeland1,2, Mimi Shin1, Yuanyu Chang1, B Jill Venton1.   

Abstract

Adenosine is important for local neuromodulation, and rapid adenosine signaling can occur spontaneously or after mechanical stimulation, but little is known about how adenosine is formed in the extracellular space for those stimulations. Here, we studied mechanically stimulated and spontaneous adenosine to determine if rapid adenosine is formed by extracellular breakdown of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) using mice globally deficient in extracellular breakdown enzymes, either CD39 (nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase 1, NTPDase1) or CD73 (ecto-5'-nucleotidase). CD39 knockout (KO) mice have a lower frequency of spontaneous adenosine events than wild-type (WT, C57BL/6). Surprisingly, CD73KO mice demonstrate sex differences in spontaneous adenosine; males maintain similar event frequencies as WT, but females have significantly fewer events and lower concentrations. Examining the mRNA expression of other enzymes that metabolize ATP revealed tissue nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) was upregulated in male CD73KO mice, but not secreted prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) or transmembrane PAP. Thus, TNAP upregulation compensates for CD73 loss in males but not in females. These sex differences highlight that spontaneous adenosine is formed by metabolism of extracellular ATP by many enzymes. For mechanically stimulated adenosine, CD39KO or CD73KO did not change stimulation frequency, concentration, or t1/2. Thus, the mechanism of formation for mechanically stimulated adenosine is likely direct release of adenosine, different than spontaneous adenosine. Understanding these different mechanisms of rapid adenosine formation will help to develop pharmacological treatments that differentially target modes of rapid adenosine signaling, and all treatments should be studied in both sexes, given possible differences in extracellular ATP degradation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenosine; CD39KO; CD73KO; PAP; TNAP; hippocampus; in vivo; mechanosensitive; sex differences; spontaneous adenosine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32083837      PMCID: PMC7335217          DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci        ISSN: 1948-7193            Impact factor:   4.418


  58 in total

1.  Prostatic acid phosphatase is not a prostate specific target.

Authors:  Ileana B Quintero; César L Araujo; Anitta E Pulkka; Riikka S Wirkkala; Annakaisa M Herrala; Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen; Eija Jokitalo; Pekka A Hellström; Hannu J Tuominen; Pasi P Hirvikoski; Pirkko T Vihko
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Comparison of spontaneous and mechanically-stimulated adenosine release in mice.

Authors:  Ying Wang; B Jill Venton
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 3.  Fundamentals of fast-scan cyclic voltammetry for dopamine detection.

Authors:  B Jill Venton; Qun Cao
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 4.  Recent advances in fast-scan cyclic voltammetry.

Authors:  Pumidech Puthongkham; B Jill Venton
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.616

5.  Dopamine release and uptake are greater in female than male rat striatum as measured by fast cyclic voltammetry.

Authors:  Q D Walker; M B Rooney; R M Wightman; C M Kuhn
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Mechanical stimulation evokes rapid increases in extracellular adenosine concentration in the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Ashley E Ross; Michael D Nguyen; Eve Privman; B Jill Venton
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.372

7.  Adenosine and stroke: maximizing the therapeutic potential of adenosine as a prophylactic and acute neuroprotectant.

Authors:  Rebecca L Williams-Karnesky; Mary P Stenzel-Poore
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.363

8.  Time and sex-dependent effects of an adenosine A2A/A1 receptor antagonist on motivation to self-administer cocaine in rats.

Authors:  Susan E Doyle; Florence J Breslin; Jayson M Rieger; Anthony Beauglehole; Wendy J Lynch
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  PAP and NT5E inhibit nociceptive neurotransmission by rapidly hydrolyzing nucleotides to adenosine.

Authors:  Sarah E Street; Paul L Walsh; Nathaniel A Sowa; Bonnie Taylor-Blake; Thomas S Guillot; Pirkko Vihko; R Mark Wightman; Mark J Zylka
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.395

10.  Inhibition of hippocampal synaptic activity by ATP, hypoxia or oxygen-glucose deprivation does not require CD73.

Authors:  Dali Zhang; Wei Xiong; Stephanie Chu; Chao Sun; Benedict C Albensi; Fiona E Parkinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Dual-Channel Electrochemical Measurements Reveal Rapid Adenosine is Localized in Brain Slices.

Authors:  Yuanyu Chang; B Jill Venton
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  Pannexin1 channels regulate mechanically stimulated but not spontaneous adenosine release.

Authors:  Scott T Lee; Yuanyu Chang; B Jill Venton
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Spontaneous Adenosine and Dopamine Cotransmission in the Caudate-Putamen Is Regulated by Adenosine Receptors.

Authors:  Jason R Borgus; Ying Wang; Dana J DiScenza; B Jill Venton
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.418

4.  Spontaneous, transient adenosine release is not enhanced in the CA1 region of hippocampus during severe ischemia models.

Authors:  Mallikarjunarao Ganesana; B Jill Venton
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.372

Review 5.  Adenosine signaling: Optimal target for gastric cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Junqing Wang; Linyong Du; Xiangjian Chen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 8.786

6.  A1 and A2A Receptors Modulate Spontaneous Adenosine but Not Mechanically Stimulated Adenosine in the Caudate.

Authors:  Yuanyu Chang; Ying Wang; B Jill Venton
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 7.  The elegant complexity of mammalian ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73).

Authors:  Karel P Alcedo; Jessica L Bowser; Natasha T Snider
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 21.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.