Literature DB >> 32083306

Unscarred uterine rupture and subsequent pregnancy outcome - a tertiary centre experience.

Nurullah Peker1, Edip Aydın2, Mehmet Sıddık Evsen3, Fatma Nur Hançer2, Muhammet Hanifi Bademkıran2, Serhat Ege2, Bekir Kahveci2, Talip Karaçor4, Talip Gül3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, etiology and obstetric outcomes of rupture in unscarred uterine rupture and in those with a history of uterine rupture
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The hospital records of women who had delivered between May 2005 and May 2017 at a tertiary center were examined retrospectively. Data on patients with unscarred uterine rupture in pregnancy who had undergone fertility-preserving surgery were evaluated.
RESULTS: During the study period, 185,609 deliveries occurred. Of those, unscarred uterine rupture has occurred in 67 women. There were no ruptures reported in nulliparous women. The rupture was observed in the isthmic region in 60 (89.6%) patients and in the fundus in 7 (10.4%) patients. Thirty-eight (56.7%) patients had undergone a total or subtotal hysterectomy, and 29 (43.3%) patients had received primary repair. Ten patients had reconceived after the repair. Of these, eight patients who had a history of isthmic rupture, successfully delivered by elective C-section at 36-37 wk. of gestation, and two experienced recurrent rupture at 33 and 34 wk. of gestation, respectively. Both patients had a history of fundal rupture, and their inter-pregnancy interval was 9 and 11 mo., respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of rupture in unscarred pregnant uteri was found to be one per 2,770 deliveries. Owing to the high morbidity, regarding more than half of the cases with rupture eventuated in hysterectomy, clinicians should be prudent in induction of labour for multiparous women since it was the main cause of rupture in this series. Short inter-pregnancy intervals and history of fundal rupture may confer a risk for rupture recurrence. Those risk factors for recurrence should be validated in another studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pregnancy outcome; recurrent uterine rupture; timing of delivery; unscarred uterine rupture; uterine repair

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32083306     DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2020.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ginekol Pol        ISSN: 0017-0011            Impact factor:   1.232


  5 in total

1.  Decision to Delivery Interval, Fetal Outcomes and Its Factors Among Emergency Caesarean Section Deliveries at South Gondar Zone Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia: Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study, 2020.

Authors:  Alemu Degu Ayele; Bekalu Getnet Kassa; Gedefaye Nibret Mihretie; Fentahun Yenealem Beyene
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2021-04-28

2.  Factors Affecting ICU Stay and Length of Stay in the ICU in Patients with HELLP Syndrome in a Tertiary Referral Hospital.

Authors:  Elif Ağaçayak; Rezan Bugday; Nurullah Peker; Ugur Deger; Gönül Ölmez Kavak; Mehmet Siddik Evsen; Talip Gul
Journal:  Int J Hypertens       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.420

3.  Determinants of uterine rupture at public hospitals of western Ethiopia: A case-control study.

Authors:  Oliyad Tesema; Temesgen Tilahun; Gemechu Kejela
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-04-21

4.  Spontaneous Rupture in a Non-Laboring Uterus at 20 Weeks: A Case Report.

Authors:  Noorkardiffa Syawalina Omar; Norazilah Mat Jin; Akmal Zulayla Mohd Zahid; Bahiyah Abdullah
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2020-08-10

5.  Uterine dehiscence in pregnant with previous caesarean delivery.

Authors:  Zhengfeng Zhu; HeZhou Li; JunQing Zhang
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.