Literature DB >> 32083242

TOM1 confers resistance to the aminoglycoside hygromycin B in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Julia M Niekamp1, Melissa D Evans1, Abigail R Scott1, Philip J Smaldino1, Eric M Rubenstein1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 32083242      PMCID: PMC7031815     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MicroPubl Biol        ISSN: 2578-9430


× No keyword cloud information.

Description

The ubiquitin ligase Tom1p contributes to regulated protein degradation, protein quantity control, and protein quality control in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. While GFP-tagged Tom1p is found in both the cytosol and nucleus, the majority of the protein is nuclear (Defenouillere et al. 2017). Among other substrates, Tom1p promotes the turnover of the DNA replication factor Cdc6p (Kim et al. 2012) and the ubiquitin ligase Dia2p (Kim and Koepp 2012) in a cell cycle-dependent manner. The enzyme also mediates the destruction of supra-stoichiometric histone molecules (Singh et al. 2009) and ribosomal proteins (Sung et al. 2016). Further, Tom1p promotes the solubility of multiple aggregation-prone proteins (Theodoraki et al. 2012; Defenouillere et al. 2017). Knockout or knockdown of the mammalian homolog Huwe1 stabilizes excess ribosomal proteins (Sung et al. 2016), suggesting conservation of enzyme function. Given its described role in protein quality control, we predicted that cells lacking Tom1p would exhibit enhanced sensitivity to conditions associated with increased abundance of aberrant proteins. The aminoglycoside hygromycin B causes ribosome A site distortion and reduces translational fidelity, leading to the production of inaccurately synthesized polypeptides (Brodersen et al. 2000; Ganoza and Kiel 2001). Loss of several quality control enzymes sensitizes cells to sublethal doses of hygromycin B (e.g. (Bengtson and Joazeiro 2010; Verma et al. 2013; Crowder et al. 2015)). Tom1p functions with the ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes Ubc4p and Ubc5p (Singh et al. 2009). ubc4Δ yeast are hypersensitive to hygromycin B; UBC5 knockout enhances this sensitivity (Chuang and Madura 2005). In this study, we analyzed the fitness of cells lacking TOM1 in the presence of hygromycin B. Wild type yeast, tom1Δ yeast, and three other yeast strains with mutations in protein quality control ubiquitin ligases (Nillegoda et al. 2010; Mehrtash and Hochstrasser 2018) were subjected to six-fold serial dilution, beginning with an optical density at 600 nm of 0.2. 4 μl of each dilution was spotted onto agar plates containing non-selective yeast growth medium with no drug or varying concentrations of hygromycin B (Figure 1A). Plates were incubated at 30°C. All yeast strains displayed similar growth in the absence of drug. As previously reported, yeast lacking either endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD) ubiquitin ligase HRD1 or DOA10 exhibited modest sensitivity to hygromycin B, while hrd1Δ doa10Δ double mutants were highly sensitive to the drug (Crowder et al. 2015). Finally, deletion of TOM1 caused a growth defect on hygromycin B comparable to loss of both ERAD enzymes. Similar results were obtained with an independently generated tom1Δ yeast strain (Defenouillere et al. 2017), providing additional support for this phenotype (Figure 1B).
Figure 1:

TOM1 confers resistance to hygromycin B.

(A) Six-fold serial dilutions of yeast of the indicated genotypes were spotted onto agar plates containing rich medium (No Drug) or rich medium containing hygromycin B. Plates were incubated at 30°C and imaged after 1 or 2 days. (B) As in A, but with an independently generated tom1Δ yeast strain.

Hygromycin B reduces ribosomal accuracy, which is expected to increase the abundance of aberrant proteins (Brodersen et al. 2000; Ganoza and Kiel 2001). A subset of these aberrant proteins is likely to be targeted by cellular protein quality control mechanisms. Indeed, loss of several quality control factors (including Ubc4p and Ubc5p) sensitizes yeast to hygromycin B (Chuang and Madura 2005; Bengtson and Joazeiro 2010; Verma et al. 2013; Crowder et al. 2015). Our results indicate that Tom1p is also critical for maximal growth in the presence of hygromycin B. This is consistent with a substantial role for Tom1p in protein quality control. Ubc4p and Ubc5p function with multiple ubiquitin ligases, including Tom1p (Singh et al. 2009; Xie et al. 2010; Stoll et al. 2011). Future experiments will determine the extent to which loss of Tom1p function accounts for hygromycin B sensitivity observed in cells lacking Ubc4p and Ubc5p. This experiment was piloted by undergraduate students in the Fall 2019 Methods in Cell Biology (BIO 315) Course at Ball State University and has been validated by two (Figure 1B) or three (Figure 1A) replications in the research laboratory of EMR. Yeast were cultured in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose medium (Guthrie and Fink 2004) with the indicated concentrations of hygromycin B (Corning).
NameAliasGenotypeFigureReference
VJY476BY4741MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 met15Δ01A(Brachmann et al. 1998)
VJY22MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 met15Δ0 hrd1Δ::kanMX41A(Tong et al. 2001)
VJY102MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 met15Δ0 doa10Δ::kanMX41A(Tong et al. 2001)
VJY305SKY252MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 met15Δ0 hrd1Δ::kanMX4 doa10Δ::kanMX41A(Habeck et al. 2015)
VJY656MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 ura3Δ0 met15Δ0 tom1Δ::kanMX41A(Tong et al. 2001)
VJY477BY4742MATα his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0 ura3Δ01B(Brachmann et al. 1998)
VJY788LMA2948MATα his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0 ura3Δ0 tom1Δ::LEU21B(Defenouillere et al. 2017)

Yeast were cultured in yeast extract-peptone-dextrose medium (Guthrie and Fink 2004) with the indicated concentrations of hygromycin B (Corning).

  19 in total

1.  SUMO-independent in vivo activity of a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase toward a short-lived transcription factor.

Authors:  Yang Xie; Eric M Rubenstein; Tanja Matt; Mark Hochstrasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  A network of ubiquitin ligases is important for the dynamics of misfolded protein aggregates in yeast.

Authors:  Maria A Theodoraki; Nadinath B Nillegoda; Jagdeep Saini; Avrom J Caplan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ub-conjugating enzyme Ubc4 binds the proteasome in the presence of translationally damaged proteins.

Authors:  Show-Mei Chuang; Kiran Madura
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Role of a ribosome-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase in protein quality control.

Authors:  Mario H Bengtson; Claudio A P Joazeiro
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Rkr1/Ltn1 Ubiquitin Ligase-mediated Degradation of Translationally Stalled Endoplasmic Reticulum Proteins.

Authors:  Justin J Crowder; Marco Geigges; Ryan T Gibson; Eric S Fults; Bryce W Buchanan; Nadine Sachs; Andrea Schink; Stefan G Kreft; Eric M Rubenstein
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation at the endoplasmic reticulum and nuclear envelope.

Authors:  Adrian B Mehrtash; Mark Hochstrasser
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 7.727

7.  Hect E3 ubiquitin ligase Tom1 controls Dia2 degradation during the cell cycle.

Authors:  Dong-Hwan Kim; Deanna M Koepp
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  A conserved quality-control pathway that mediates degradation of unassembled ribosomal proteins.

Authors:  Min-Kyung Sung; Tanya R Porras-Yakushi; Justin M Reitsma; Ferdinand M Huber; Michael J Sweredoski; André Hoelz; Sonja Hess; Raymond J Deshaies
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Cdc48/p97 promotes degradation of aberrant nascent polypeptides bound to the ribosome.

Authors:  Rati Verma; Robert S Oania; Natalie J Kolawa; Raymond J Deshaies
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  The yeast ERAD-C ubiquitin ligase Doa10 recognizes an intramembrane degron.

Authors:  Gregor Habeck; Felix A Ebner; Hiroko Shimada-Kreft; Stefan G Kreft
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  3 in total

1.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated point mutations improve α-amylase secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yanyan Wang; Xiaowei Li; Xin Chen; Verena Siewers
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 2.923

2.  APC/C Cdh1p and Slx5p/Slx8p ubiquitin ligases confer resistance to aminoglycoside hygromycin B in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Philip J Smaldino; Jason D True; Ashley L Kalinski; Ellen M Doss; Mary E Tragesser-Tiña; Yanru Huang; Eric M Rubenstein
Journal:  MicroPubl Biol       Date:  2022-03-24

3.  Inner Nuclear Membrane Asi Ubiquitin Ligase Catalytic Subunits Asi1p and Asi3p, but not Asi2p, confer resistance to aminoglycoside hygromycin B in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kelsey A Woodruff; Kyle A Richards; Melissa D Evans; Abigail R Scott; Brian M Voas; Courtney Broshar Irelan; James B Olesen; Philip J Smaldino; Eric M Rubenstein
Journal:  MicroPubl Biol       Date:  2021-06-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.