| Literature DB >> 32083035 |
Ali Nada1, Mohamed Abbasy1, Aliaa Sabry1, Azza Mohamed Abdu Allah2, Somaia Shehab-Eldeen3, Nada Elnaidany4, Hanan Elimam5, Kawthar Ibraheem Mohamed Ibraheem6, Abdallah Essa3.
Abstract
Background: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) made a drastic change in the management of HCV infection. Sofosbuvir is one of the highly potent DAAs, eliminated mainly through the kidney. But concerns about renal safety during treatment may limit its use. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has been proven as a predictor of renal tubular injury. Hence, the aim of this work was to assess serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in HCV-positive patients before and after treatment with the sofosbuvir-based antiviral regimen.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32083035 PMCID: PMC7007947 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1632959
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol ISSN: 2291-2789
Characteristics of the studied population before treatment.
| Characteristics | Studied group ( |
|---|---|
| Qualitative variables (no., %) | |
| Gender | |
| Male | 26 (29.9%) |
| Female | 61 (70.1%) |
|
| |
| BMI | |
| 18.5–24.9 | 20 (23%) |
| 25.0–29.9 | 48 (55.2%) |
| 30.0 and above | 19 (21.8%) |
|
| |
| Diabetes | |
| Yes | 6 (6.9%) |
| No | 81 (93.1%) |
|
| |
| Hypertension | |
| Yes | 18 (20.7%) |
| No | 69 (79.3%) |
|
| |
| Liver | |
| Normal | 60 (69%) |
| Cirrhotic | 27 (31%) |
|
| |
| Quantitative variables (mean ± SD) | |
| Age (years) | 50.18 ± 10.01 |
| HCV RNA (copies/ml) | 925507 ± 1241001 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dl) | 0.88 ± 0.2 |
| Serum albumin (mg/dl) | 4.32 ± 0.52 |
| INR | 1.06 ± 0.08 |
| AST (U/L) | 44.66 ± 18.2 |
| ALT (U/L) | 49.2 ± 28.97 |
| HB (g/dl) | 13.48 ± 1.4 |
| Platelet ( | 208.86 ± 66.02 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.9 ± 0.48 |
| eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) | 83.92 ± 20.18 |
| FIB4 score | 1.7 ± 0.9 |
| APRI score | 0.6 ± 0.39 |
BMI: body mass index; HCV RNA: hepatitis C virus-ribonucleic acid; INR: international normalization ratio; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; HB: hemoglobin; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; FIB4 : fibrosis four; APRI : AST to platelet ratio index.
Serum NGAL among the patients when ranked by different parameters.
| Parameter | (No., %) | Serum NGAL (ng/ml) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||
| Male | 26 (29.9%) | 336.69 ± 217.31 | 0.75 |
| Female | 61 (70.1%) | 330.92 ± 333.69 | |
|
| |||
| Diabetes | |||
| Yes | 6 (6.9%) | 265.73 ± 60.40 | 0.39 |
| No | 81 (93.1%) | 337.60 ± 312.55 | |
|
| |||
| Hypertension | |||
| Yes | 18 (20.7%) | 362.4 ± 279.77 | 0.35 |
| No | 69 (79.3%) | 324.88 ± 309.44 | |
|
| |||
| Liver | |||
| Normal | 60 (69%) | 327.19 ± 221.00 | 0.65 |
| Cirrhotic | 27 (31%) | 344.78 ± 437.42 | |
|
| |||
| HCV RNA (copies/ml) | |||
| Less than 1000000 | 51 (58.6%) | 336.57 ± 356.83 | 0.58 |
| More than 1000000 | 36 (41.4%) | 327.09 ± 206.59 | |
|
| |||
| FIB4 | |||
| G1: <1.45 | 41 (47.1%) | 329.99 ± 368.24 |
|
| G2: 1.45 to 3.25 | 42 (38. 3%) | 346.56 ± 240.549 |
|
| G3: >3.25 | 4 (4.6%) | 213.8 ± 15.05 |
|
|
| |||
| APRI | |||
| G1: <0.5 | 45 (51.7%) | 329.99 ± 368.24 |
|
| G2: 0.5–1.5 | 38 (43.7%) | 346.56 ± 240.55 |
|
| G3: >1.5 | 4 (4.6%) | 213.8 ± 15.05 |
|
G: group; P1: P value for G1 vs G2; P2: P value for G1 vs G3; P3: P value for G2 vs G3.
Figure 1Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) at baseline according to ranks of the estimated glomerular filtration rate.
Figure 2Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and EOT among the overall studied population.
Figure 3Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline and EOT among patients ranked according to KDIGO-CKD classification.
Figure 4Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) at baseline and EOT among the overall studied population.
Figure 5Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) at baseline and EOT among patients ranked according to KDIGO-CKD classification.
Figure 6Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) at EOT according to ribavirin (RBV) use.
Correlation analysis of serum NGAL at EOT with baseline and EOT parameters.
| Parameter |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Age (years) | −0.05 | 0.74 |
| BMI | 0.006 | 0.97 |
| HCV_PCR (copies/ml) | 0.26 | 0.09 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dl) | 0.07 | 0.66 |
| Serum albumin (mg/dl) | 0.11 | 0.48 |
| INR | −0.02 | 0.89 |
| ALT (U/L) | −0.09 | 0.55 |
| AST (U/L) | −0.11 | 0.47 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | −0.04 | 0.78 |
| eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) | 0.13 | 0.39 |
| HB (g/dl) | 0.11 | 0.46 |
| Platelets ( | 0.13 | 0.39 |
| FIB4 score | −0.19 | 0.21 |
| APRI score | −0.17 | 0.26 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| ALT (U/L) | −0.05 | 0.72 |
| AST (U/L) | -0.1 | 0.49 |
| Total bilirubin (mg/dl) | -0.03 | 0.83 |
| Creatinine (mg/dl) | 0.07 | 0.65 |
| eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2) | 0.09 | 0.55 |
| HB (g/dl) | 0.16 | 0.06 |
| Platelets ( | 0.10 | 0.50 |
r: correlation coefficient.