Literature DB >> 32082731

Intraoperative transit-time flow measurement in on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Single center experience.

Uğur Kaya1, Abdurrahim Çolak1, Necip Becit1, Münacettin Ceviz1, Hikmet Koçak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the effects of graft dysfunction detected by intraoperative transit-time flow measurement on the outcomes of on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
METHODS: A total of 1,240 patients (856 males, 384 females; mean age 57.4±12.1 years; range, 47 to 74 years), who underwent isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery via median sternotomy performed by the same surgical team, were reviewed retrospectively. With the introduction of transit-time flow measurement into practice at our clinic in 2006, all patients regularly underwent transit-time flow measurement during surgery in order to evaluate the graft patency. Interpretation of the data obtained using the transit-time flow measurement in patients who underwent surgery has directed our decision as to whether to perform graft revision. Patients were evaluated for early- and late-period mortality/ morbidity, perioperative and postoperative myocardial infarction, and intraaortic balloon requirement.
RESULTS: A total of 3,596 grafts in the perioperative period was evaluated using transit-time flow measurement. Anastomosis/graft revision, new anastomosis/patch plasty to distal native artery or free left internal mammary artery graft was performed in 146 grafts of 143 patients in whom transittime flow measurement showed insufficient patency. Four of six patients who developed peri/postoperative myocardial infarction were found to have perioperative hypotension, ST elevation, and wall motion abnormality on transesophageal echocardiography before closure of the sternum. The flow was corrected by extending the short length of the grafts with insufficient flow after transit-time flow measurement and it was recorded that transit-time flow measurements were at normal values at these four grafts. Two patients developed acute myocardial infarction in the postoperative period and stent was applied in one vessel of each patient; however, one of these patients died. Sixteen patients were inserted intraaortic balloon pump, four of which being in the preoperative period. Revision surgery was performed due to bleeding in 56 patients and sternal infection in 12 patients. Of all patients, 28 (2.3%) died in the early postoperative period.
CONCLUSION: We believe that transit-time flow measurement may be an important tool in evaluating graft function and contribute to eliminate the causes of graft failure during surgery.
Copyright © 2018, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery bypass grafting; graft patency; transit-time flow measurement

Year:  2018        PMID: 32082731      PMCID: PMC7024117          DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg        ISSN: 1301-5680            Impact factor:   0.332


  20 in total

1.  Severe impairment of graft flow without electrocardiographic changes during coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  H L Jakobsen; H K Kjaergard
Journal:  Scand Cardiovasc J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.589

2.  Intra-operative quality assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts.

Authors:  R Groom; J Tryzelaar; R Forest; K Niimi; G Cecere; D Donegan; S Katz; P Weldner; R Quinn; J Braxton; S Blank; R Kramer; J Morton
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Real-time patency control with thermal coronary angiography in 1401 coronary artery bypass grafting patients.

Authors:  Bingür Sönmez; Harun Arbatli; Selim Tansal; Naci Yagan; Mehmet Unal; Ergun Demirsoy; Faruk Tükenmez; Oguz Yilmaz
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Cardiomed coronary flow meter for prevention of early occlusion in aortocoronary bypass grafting.

Authors:  Marek Gwozdziewicz
Journal:  Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.245

5.  Transit-time flow measurement is essential in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Derek K H Leong; Venkataraman Ashok; Arulkumaran Nishkantha; Yue Hong Shan; Eugene K W Sim
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Baseline flow in coronary bypass grafts.

Authors:  Henrik K Kjaergard
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.620

7.  Sequential bypass grafting on the beating heart: blood flow characteristics.

Authors:  Marek Gwozdziewicz; Petr Nemec; Martin Simek; Roman Hajek; Martin Troubil
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Variability in transfusion practice for coronary artery bypass surgery persists despite national consensus guidelines: a 24-institution study. Institutions of the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group.

Authors:  E P Stover; L C Siegel; R Parks; J Levin; S C Body; R Maddi; M N D'Ambra; D T Mangano; B D Spiess
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Graft revision after transit time flow measurement in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  G D'Ancona; H L Karamanoukian; M Ricci; S Schmid; J Bergsland; T A Salerno
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Comparison of intraoperative transit-time flow measurement with early postoperative magnetic resonance flow mapping in off-pump coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  Ilhan Sanisoglu; Mustafa Guden; Cem Balci; Ertan Sagbas; Cihan Duran; Belhhan Akpinar
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2003
View more
  1 in total

1.  Newly Developed Graft Failure Detected Using Computed Tomography Within 1 Year After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: One Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Zhaoshui Li; Youjin Qiao; Wei Sheng; Yifan Chi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.