Literature DB >> 32082721

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration: Determinants of adequacy.

Dilek Ece1, Sevinç Hallaç Keser1, Benan Çağlayan2, Banu Salepçi2, Gamze Babur Güler3, Sibel Sensu1, Gonca Geçmen1, Şermin Kökten1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the factors influencing the adequacy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration specimens.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1,700 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspiration samples obtained from 822 patients (500 males, 322 females; mean age 56±13 years; range 16 to 83 years) was performed between March 2011 and March 2014 at our center. Variables potentially associated with sampling adequacy, such as all cytological materials and procedure notes (lymph node and/or lesion size, localization, needle pass number, and slide number) were examined.
RESULTS: The overall specimen adequacy was 79.8%. The specimen adequacy was associated with needle pass number (p≤0.001). Adequacy rate was 66.9% for one needle pass and 85.8% for three needle passes. According to the sampling regions, adequacy rates showed a difference [69.2%-85.8%; (p≤0.005)]. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis of subcarinal (7) lymph node station, patient age (odds ratio, 0.983; 95% confidence interval, 0.966-1.000; p=0.049) and number of slides (odds ratio, 1.240; 95% confidence interval, 1.062-1.448; p=0.006) were independent determining factors of specimen adequacy. While independent determinants of specimen adequacy for the right paratracheal (4R) region were lymph node size (odds ratio, 1.486; 95% confidence interval, 0.973-2.268; p=0.067) and number of slides (odds ratio, 1.418; 95% confidence interval, 1.146-1.756; p=0.001), they were lymph node size (odds ratio, 1.594; 95% confidence interval, 0.960-2.645; p=0.071) and number of needle passes (odds ratio, 2.277; 95% confidence interval, 1.360-3.811; p=0.002) for the right interlobar (11R) region. Independent determinant of specimen adequacy for the left paratracheal (4L) lymph node station was the number of needle passes (odds ratio, 1.656; 95% confidence interval, 0.955-2.869; p=0.072).
CONCLUSION: During endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine needle aspirations, particularly when rapid on site evaluation cannot be applied, consideration of factors affecting adequacy according to lymph node localizations may increase the chance for obtaining materials with suitable quality for cytologic evaluation.
Copyright © 2018, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adequacy; endobronchial ultrasound; transbronchial fine needle aspiration

Year:  2018        PMID: 32082721      PMCID: PMC7018103          DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.14197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg        ISSN: 1301-5680            Impact factor:   0.332


  22 in total

1.  Preliminary experience with a new method of endoscopic transbronchial real time ultrasound guided biopsy for diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lesions.

Authors:  M Krasnik; P Vilmann; S S Larsen; G K Jacobsen
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Acquisition and processing of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens in the era of targeted lung cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  William Bulman; Anjali Saqi; Charles A Powell
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging.

Authors:  R C Rintoul; K M Skwarski; J T Murchison; W A Wallace; W S Walker; I D Penman
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 16.671

4.  Cytology of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a retrospective study with histology correlation.

Authors:  David Feller-Kopman; Rex Chin-Wei Yung; Frances Burroughs; Qing Kay Li
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes.

Authors:  F J F Herth; R Eberhardt; P Vilmann; M Krasnik; A Ernst
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for nodal staging in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Nakajima; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Fumie Saegusa; Taiki Fujiwara; Yuichi Sakairi; Kenzo Hiroshima; Yukio Nakatani; Ichiro Yoshino
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: determinants of sampling adequacy.

Authors:  Zachary S DePew; Eric S Edell; David E Midthun; John J Mullon; Aaron O Bungum; Paul A Decker; Fabien Maldonado
Journal:  J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol       Date:  2012-10

8.  Comparison of moderate versus deep sedation for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration.

Authors:  Lonny B Yarmus; Jason A Akulian; Christopher Gilbert; Stephen C Mathai; Srividya Sathiyamoorthy; Sarina Sahetya; Kassem Harris; Colin Gillespie; Andrew Haas; David Feller-Kopman; Daniel Sterman; Hans J Lee
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2013-04

9.  Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: how many aspirations per target lymph node station?

Authors:  Hee Seok Lee; Geon Kook Lee; Hyun-Sung Lee; Moon Soo Kim; Jong Mog Lee; Hyae Young Kim; Byung-Ho Nam; Jae Ill Zo; Bin Hwangbo
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Utility of on-site evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens.

Authors:  Adrienne Carruth Griffin; Lauren Ende Schwartz; Zubair W Baloch
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 2.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.