| Literature DB >> 32082575 |
Andrew M Durso1,2, Geoffrey D Smith1,3, Spencer B Hudson1, Susannah S French1.
Abstract
Spatial and temporal variation in stoichiometric and stable isotope ratios of animals contains ecological information that we are just beginning to understand. In both field and lab studies, stoichiometric or isotopic ratios are related to physiological mechanisms underlying nutrition or stress. Conservation and ecosystem ecology may be informed by isotopic data that can be rapidly and non-lethally collected from wild animals, especially where human activity leaves an isotopic signature (e.g. via introduction of chemical fertilizers, ornamental or other non-native plants or organic detritus). We examined spatial and temporal variation in stoichiometric and stable isotope ratios of the toes of Uta stansburiana (side-blotched lizards) living in urban and rural areas in and around St. George, Utah. We found substantial spatial and temporal variation as well as context-dependent co-variation with reproductive physiological parameters, although certain key predictions such as the relationship between δ15N and body condition were not supported. We suggest that landscape change through urbanization can have profound effects on wild animal physiology and that stoichiometric and stable isotope ratios can provide unique insights into the mechanisms underlying these processes.Entities:
Keywords: Uta stansburiana; body condition; carbon; community ecology; corticosterone; ecosystem ecology; fasting; immunity; nitrogen; nutritional stress; oxidative stress; urbanization
Year: 2020 PMID: 32082575 PMCID: PMC7019090 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coaa001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Sample sizes from all sites in all years
| Urban Sites | Rural Sites | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | U1 | U2 | U3 | R1 | R2 | R3 | |
| 2013 | 20 | 30 | 8 | 18 | 20 | 19 | 115 |
| 2014 | 21 | 19 | 16 | 19 | 18 | 29 | 122 |
| 2015 | 12 | 15 | 19 | 13 | 22 | 13 | 94 |
| 2016 | 13 | 0* | 29 | 19 | 11 | 22 | 94 |
| 2017 | 36 | 0* | 36 | 36 | 30 | 29 | 167 |
| Total | 102 | 64 | 108 | 105 | 101 | 112 | 592 |
All sites are rocky areas ≤ 1.8 ha in size near or along riparian corridors. *One urban site was completely developed into a parking lot in late 2015; we nevertheless searched for lizards there in 2016 but found none
Comparison of anthropic characteristics of urban (n = 3) and rural (n = 3) sites
| Urban sites | Rural sites | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measure of anthropogenic influence | U1 | U2 | U3 | R1 | R2 | R3 |
| Human population density (people/km2) in surrounding 2 km2 area | 777.8 | 873.6 | 392.8 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 18.2 |
| km of roads in surrounding 2 km2 area | 102 | 103 | 80 | 9 | 28 | 28 |
| % impacted watercourses in surrounding 2 km2 area | 45% | 54% | 51% | 0% | 16% | 32% |
| Total area of active human use (m2) within 250 m | 189 595 | 56 169 | 101 119 | 8326 | 30 592 | 28 668 |
| Elevation (m a.s.l.) | 775 | 790 | 766 | 1304 | 1242 | 1179 |
| Dominant vegetation | City (51%), cultivated land (39%), creosotebush (10%) | Cultivated land (86%), city (10%), creosotebush (5%) | Creosotebush (95%), city (5%)* | Utah juniper (100%) | Utah juniper (82%), shadscale (18%) | Utah juniper (55%), shadscale (45%) |
A buffer of 2 km2 was chosen because this was the largest distance that prevented buffers from overlapping. U.S. Census data from 2010 were used to calculate population density. *Dominant vegetation data are the most recent available, from 2001; since this time, the area around site U3 has been developed
Rainfall in the 12 months preceding each of our sampling occasions (which took place in early May)
| Year | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative rainfall (mm) | 143 | 201 | 197 | 98 | 298 | 290 |
We did not sample in 2012, but it is included because it may be relevant to sampling that took place in 2013. Data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2018)
Type III ANOVA table showing variation among sites, years, and sexes
| δ13C | δ15N | C:N | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor |
|
| Factor |
|
| Factor |
|
|
| Site | 1145,539 |
| Site | 1185,539 |
| Site | 6.565,539 |
|
| Year | 34.14,539 |
| Year | 5.34,539 |
| Year | 14.394,539 |
|
| Sex | 1.621,539 | 0.200 | Sex | 1.181,539 | 0.280 | Sex | 0.421,539 | 0.520 |
Significant P values are highlighted in bold. Interactions were not significant
Figure 1Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios of toes of side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) at three urban and three rural sites in southwestern Utah, with normal 95% confidence ellipses assuming a multivariate normal (solid) and multivariate t-distribution (dashed), computed using stat_ellipse in R
Figure 2Annual variation in stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios of toes of side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) at three urban and three rural sites in southwestern Utah
Figure 3Close and consistent relationship between stable carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios of plants, ants, and toes of side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) at three rural, but not three urban sites in southwestern Utah
Figure 4Proportion of side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana) toe tissue predicted to be derived from plants with C3 and C4/CAM photosynthetic pathways at two rural and two urban sites. Site-specific output from siarmcmcdirichletv4 in package siar (Parnell and Jackson, 2011) with 200 000 iterations and a burn-in of 50 000, thinning by 15. We used TEF values of 6 ± 0.5 for N and 2 ± 0.05 for C. Sites U2 and R3 are not shown because we collected two few C4/CAM plants to model
Figure 5Co-variation of toe δ13C ratio and clutch size of female side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) at three urban and three rural sites in southwestern Utah, by year
Figure 6Higher increase in plasma corticosterone after handling in female side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana) with higher toe C:N ratio in 2013.