| Literature DB >> 32082295 |
Martin Eiden1, Lisa Dähnert1, Susanne Spoerel1,2, Ariel Vina-Rodriguez1, Ronald Schröder3, Franz J Conraths3, Martin H Groschup1.
Abstract
Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the main course for acute hepatitis in humans throughout the world. Human associated genotypes 1 and 2 as well as zoonotic genotypes 3 and 4 are grouped in the species Orthohepevirus A. In addition, a large variety of HEV-related viruses has been found in vertebrates including carnivores, rats, bats, and chickens, which were classified in species Orthohepevirus B-D. In 2015, partial genome sequences of a novel hepevirus were detected in feces of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). However, no further information about virus circulation and the prevalence in foxes was available. We therefore assayed a unique panel of 880 transudates, which was collected from red foxes over 19 years (1993-2012) in Brandenburg, Germany, for HEV-related viral RNA and antibodies. Our results demonstrate a high antibody prevalence of HEV in red foxes, which oscillated annually between 40 and 100%. Molecular screening of the transudates revealed only a single RNA-positive sample, which was assigned to the carnivore species Orthohepevirus C based on the amplified partial sequence. These data indicate that the virus is circulating widely in the fox population and that foxes are carriers of this virus.Entities:
Keywords: Orthohepevirus C; foxes; hepatitis E virus; infection; transudates
Year: 2020 PMID: 32082295 PMCID: PMC7005575 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Prevalence of antibodies to Hepatitis E virus among red foxes in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany. (A) Prevalence estimates per year and the respective two-sided 95% confidence intervals are shown. Differences in prevalences were compared by the Fisher exact test und significant differences (p < 0.05) indicated by asterics.
Figure 2Spatial distribution of HEV-tested fox samples in the federal state of Brandenburg, Germany. The geographic origin of each examined fox sample is plotted on the map. The districts of Ostprignitz-Ruppin and Prignitz, from where the majority of samples were obtained, are marked. Positive samples are represented by red dots, negative samples by green dots. Overview comprising 20 years (A) and annual distributions (B).
Overview of analyzed fox samples. The age of each fox was determined as adult (born in a previous year) or juvenile (born in the year of sampling).
| Sample characteristics | Positive [%] | Negative [%] | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 367 [80,1] | 91 [19,9] | 458 |
| Female | 236 [81,7] | 53 [18,3] | 289 | |
| Unknown | 86 [64,7] | 47 [35,3] | 133 | |
| Age | Adult | 522 [80,1] | 130 [19,9] | 652 |
| Juvenile | 70 [86,4] | 11 [13,6] | 81 | |
| Unknown | 97 [66,0] | 50 [34,0] | 147 | |
Figure 3Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on partial RdRp sequences. Red boldface indicates fox sequence from Germany (this study). Boldface displays fox sequence from the Netherlands. Scale bar indicates mean number of substitutions per site.