Literature DB >> 32082006

Tilted Optic Disc Frequency in Myopia of Different Degree.

Edita Dervisevic1, Nejira Ibrisevic1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Change in the fundus in myopic patients are often characterized by partially atrophic and tilted optic disc insertions. Due to the altered nerve fiber arrangement, it is more difficult to detect the initial pathological changes of the optic disc. This subject is important because myopia represents well known risk factor for glaucoma. AIM: This study explored frequency of tilted optic disc in different degree of myopia which has major effect on glaucoma assesment due to unreliable OCTs parameters of the neuroretinal rim in patients with tilted disc.
METHODS: Between September 2013 and December 2014, total number of 150 patiens from ophtalmic polyclinic "Dr Sefic" underwent complete ophtalmic examniation. Total of 300 eyes were tested. Patients were separated in 3 groups by diagnosis. Each group was divided by the size of the optic disc diameter into three categories. ANOVA test was used in analysis.
RESULTS: Subjects with tilted disc shape have the highest degree of myopia, and there is a statistically significant difference with other forms of optic disc regardless of the size of the disc itself (p <0.05). The patients with a large disc (4.05 ± 0.65) had the highest degree of myopia in subclass of tilted discs, and these values decreased linearly in relation to the size of the tilted disc.
CONCLUSION: Myopia height values decreased linearly with respect to the size of the tilted disc.
© 2019 Edita Dervisevic, Nejira Ibrisevic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glaucoma; myopia; tilted optic disc

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 32082006      PMCID: PMC7007631          DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2019.73.391-393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Arch        ISSN: 0350-199X


INTRODUCTION

Myopia is a refractive anomaly in which parallel light rays coming from infinity, after breaking through the optical system of the eye, focus in front of the retina (1). Experimental models of myopia and epidemiological data have shown that myopia is most often the result of disproportional elongation of the posterior segment of the eye, which is physically restricted by fibrotic sclera. Axial length is the most important element of eye refraction that determines the most a refractive error (2). As the sclera is more and more stretched and at the same time thinning, the choroid cannot follow the sclera in this stretch, much less the retina, and the Weiss’s circumferential reflex is first observed ophthalmologically next to the nasal edge of the optic disc. Further pathological elongation of the eye develops a white-yellow peripapillary cone in the shape of a crescent (conus myopicus), usually first temporally and then around the entire optic disc (3). This cone is caused by atrophy of the choroid and the retinal pigment layer. The inside of this cone is made up of a whitish-yellow sclera seen next to the optical disc itself. A little further away from the disc is a flat, gray choroid that has failed to fully track the sclera. The outer edge of the cone limits the retina by its edge. Sometimes in direct contact with the edge of the disc, the retina, after pathological elongation of the eye, is farthest from the disc. Due to its structure it can stretch the least. As the disease progresses, the cone surrounds the entire disc, taking the form of a whitish-yellowish ring (4). This change in the fundus is often characterized by partially atrophic and tilted optic disc insertions which are relative to the scleral canal. If glaucoma occurs, classical glaucoma excavation does not develop (5). Due to the altered nerve fiber arrangement, it is more difficult to detect the initial pathological changes of the disc. The outer, peripheral edge of the cone is formed by the edge of the retina, separated by these changes from the edge of the disc with which it was in contact (6). The relation between glaucoma and myopia is often a subject of controversy, mainly due to the fact that it is difficult to sort out the structural and functional abnormalities we meet in myopia from the real glaucoma changes. Myopia is known risk factor for glaucoma (7). There is strong epidemiological evidence linking myopia to glaucoma. Myopic optic discs can be a major challenge in making the correct diagnosis of glaucoma (8).

AIM

This study explored frequency of tilted optic disc in different degree of myopia which has major effect on glaucoma assesment due to unreliable OCTs parameters of the neuroretinal rim in patients with tilted disc.

METHODS

This is a prospective-retrospective, comparative, randomized, clinical trial conducted between September 2013 and December 2014. Patients from the ophthalmic polyclinic “Dr Sefic” Sarajevo participated in the study. Of the 150 respondents, 97 were female and 53 were male. The age of the respondents ranged from 18 to 80 years. In order to perform a scientifically valid statistical comparison, a total of 300 eyes were tested, ie 100 eyes per 3 groups of subjects of both sexes: Group I - patients with glaucoma, Group II - patients with myopia and diagnosed with glaucoma, Group III - patients with myopia only. Each group is divided by the size of the optic disc diameter into three categories: Small optic disc (<1.30mm), Medium optic disc (between 1.31 mm-2.09 mm), Large optic disc (> 2.10 mm). The morphology of the optic disc in all the study groups is descriptively presented.

RESULTS

The study included 300 eyes of respondents who were classified into three equal groups according to the criteria for inclusion in the study. The first group consisted of patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma and analyzed 100 eyes with glaucoma, the second group included patients who were diagnosed with glaucoma with myopia (n = 100), and the third group were patients who were diagnosed with only myopia (n = 100). Analyzing the average value of diopter height in patients with myopia and patients who had myopia in addition to glaucoma revealed a statistically significant difference. The average level of diopter in patients with glaucoma and myopia was -3.77 ± 1.55, while in patients with myopia alone it was -2.49 ± 1.25, F = 40,940; p <0.05. Using the ANOVA test, a statistically significant difference in the height of myopia was found with respect to the shape of the disc. Even with small, medium and large discs, subjects with tilted disc shape have the highest degree of myopia, and there is a statistically significant difference with other forms of optic disc regardless of the size of the disc itself (p <0.05). The patients with a large disc (4.05 ± 0.65) had the highest degree of myopia in subclass of tilted discs, and these values decreased linearly in relation to the size of the tilted disc.

DISCUSSION

Evaluating morphometric parameters of the optic nerve head and peripapillary areas in patients with different myopia degree we are one step closer to identifying changes in the optic disc as the earliest signs related to glaucoma. At Lomonosov University in Moscow in 2010, after years of research, a group of Russian scientists Akopjan et al. examining the effect of myopia on glaucoma, came to the conclusion that atypical discs are characterized by a specific distribution of the neuroretinal rim and by a characteristic glaucoma changes. Prominence and tilted optic discs can mask the signs of glaucoma; large, oval, shallow discs and optic discs with large excavations can also mask the real picture of glaucoma changes. In eyes with tilted optic discs, OCTs have been found to be unreliable by the parameters of the neuretinal rim (due to an OCT analysis error because of the low position of the basal surfaces of the tilted discs), and therefore a formula for calculating the error in these cases is proposed to determine the correct value of neuroretinal rim (<0.345 mm³) in differential diagnosis of glaucoma. Knowing the real values of the neuroretinal rim in myopes is invaluable in establishing the correct diagnosis of glaucoma. Not only in atypical forms of the optic disc (oblique insertions), but also in other forms of the optic nerve head, which will try to overcome the current disadvantages of coherent tomography no matter what highly sophisticated testing technique is used.

CONCLUSION

The largest percentage of subjects in the small optic disc and glaucoma group had a circular disc shape (52.6%) as in the subjects with myopia (78.6%), while the subjects with glaucoma and myopia had the most tilted disc shape (66. 7%). In the middle disc group, the subjects most often had a circular disc shape, and the tilted shape was equally represented in subjects with myopia and myopia with glaucoma (30%). In the large disc group, the largest percentage of tilted discs were found in subjects diagnosed with myopia and glaucoma (40.5%). The highest degree of myopia, regardless of the size of the optic disc, was observed in subjects with tilted disc shape in all three study groups. The subjects with a large disc (4.05 + -0.65) had the highest degree of myopia in tilted discs. Myopia height values decreased linearly with respect to the size of the tilted disc.
Table 1.

Myopia degree in relation to the study group

NXSDSEM95% CIMinimumMaximum
LowerUpper
Glaucoma100
Glaucoma and myopia100-3,771,55,156-4,08-3,46-8-1
Myopia100-2,491,25,126-2,74-2,24-6-1
F=40,940; p<0,05
Table 2.

Average value of myopia in relation to the size and shape of the optic disc

DISCNXSDSEM95% CIMinimumMaximum
LowerUper
SmallTilted73.29.480.1842.833.7434
Round112.091.040.3151.392.7914
Shallow dish-shaped21.00.000.00 01.001.0011
F=7.208; p=0.005
MediumTilted383.261.200.1952.873.6615
Round651.650.990.1231.401.8914
Elipsed53.000.000.0004.004.0033
Shallow dish-shaped111.180.600.182.781.5913
F=28.927; p=0.001
LargeTilted224.050.650.1393.764.3335
Round362.251.250.2081.832.6714
Elipsed12.000...22
Shallow dish-shaped21.000.000.0001.001.0011
F=15.499; p=0.001
Table 3.

The degree of myopia of tilted discs in relation to the optic disc size

Shape of the discNXSDSEM95% CIMinimumMaximum
LowerUpper
TiltedSmall73.260.480.1842.833.7434
Medium383.291.200.1952.873.6615
Large224.050.650.1393.764.3335
F=4.500; p=0.015
  7 in total

Review 1.  [Is myopia a risk factor for glaucoma?].

Authors:  M Detry-Morel
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 0.818

Review 2.  Epidemiology of myopia.

Authors:  P J Foster; Y Jiang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Myopia and glaucoma: sorting out the difference.

Authors:  Chi-Hsin Hsu; Rebecca I Chen; Shan C Lin
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.761

4.  The effect of myopic optic disc tilt on measurement of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography parameters.

Authors:  Hye-Young Shin; Hae-Young Lopilly Park; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Myopia and glaucoma: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.

Authors:  Robert T Chang; Kuldev Singh
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.761

6.  Torsion of the optic nerve head is a prominent feature of normal-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  Hae-Young L Park; Kee-Il Lee; Kook Lee; Hye Young Shin; Chan Kee Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  [Myopia and glaucoma].

Authors:  Christoph Faschinger; Georg Mossböck
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  ODTiD: Optic Nerve Head SD-OCT Image Dataset.

Authors:  Janarthanam Jothi Balaji; Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.