| Literature DB >> 32081971 |
Linling Ju1, Yan Sun2, Hong Xue3, Lin Chen1, Chunyan Gu4, Jianguo Shao1, Rujian Lu5, Xi Luo1, Jue Wei6, Xiong Ma7, Zhaolian Bian8.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by increased uptake and accumulation of lipids in hepatocytes. Simple steatosis may progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with inflammation, hepatocellular injury and fibrosis. CCN1 is an important matrix protein that regulates cell death and promotes immune cell adhesion and may potentially control this process. The role of CCN1 in NASH remains unclear. We investigated the role of CCN1 in the pathogenesis of steatohepatitis. CCN1 upregulation was found to be closely related with steatosis in patients with NASH, obese mice and a FFA-treated hepatocyte model. Controlling the expression of CCN1 in murine NASH models demonstrated that CCN1 increased the severity of steatosis and inflammation. From the sequence results, we found that fatty acid metabolism genes were primarily involved in the MCD mice overexpressing CCN1 compared to the control. Then, the expression of fatty acid metabolism genes was determined using a custom-designed pathway-focused qPCR-based gene expression array. Expression analysis showed that CCN1 overexpression significantly upregulated the expression of fatty acid metabolism-associated genes. In vitro analysis revealed that CCN1 increased the intracellular TG content, the pro-inflammatory cytokines and the expression level of apoptosis-associated proteins in a steatosis model using murine primary hepatocytes. We identified CCN1 as an important positive regulator in NASH.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32081971 PMCID: PMC7035350 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60138-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical and biochemical features of healthy controls and patients with NASH.
| Factors | Healthy controls (n = 22) | NASH |
|---|---|---|
| Female (n) | 14 | 11 |
| Age (years) | 50.30 ± 7.96 | 51.10 ± 11.47 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.6 ± 4.2 | 27.3 ± 5.1** |
| ALT (UI/I) | 21.60 ± 10.37 | 132.70 ± 552.0** |
| AST (UI/I) | 18.00 ± 5.08 | 62.90 ± 34.15** |
| AKP (UI/I) | 86.00 ± 21.40 | 87.00 ± 16.2 |
| GGT (UI/I) | 16.70 ± 10.70 | 93.22 ± 78.88* |
| Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 8.88 ± 4.23 | 13.22 ± 5.07 |
| Conjugated bilirubin (μmol/L) | 3.66 ± 2.16 | 4.18 ± 1.52 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. healthy controls.
Figure 1The levels of CCN1 were increased in patients with NASH and mouse models. (A) Serum CCN1 levels were increased in patients with NASH (369.8 ± 90.1 pg/ml, p < 0.01) compared with healthy controls (240.4 ± 42.1 pg/ml); (B). Hepatic CCN1 mRNA detected by qPCR in patients with NASH and healthy controls; (C). Hepatic CCN1 protein detected by western blot in patients with NASH and healthy controls; (D). Serum level of CCN1 in MCD mice and controls; (E). Hepatic CCN1 mRNA detected by qPCR in MCD mice and controls; (F). Hepatic CCN1 protein detected by western blot in MCD mice and controls; (G). Serum level of CCN1 in HF mice and controls; H. Hepatic CCN1 mRNA detected by qPCR in HF mice and controls; I. Hepatic CCN1 protein detected by western blot in HF mice and controls; Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test. The error bar indicates the SD. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2(A) Immunohistochemical staining of hepatic CCN1 in human livers from healthy controls and patients with NASH (400×). (B) Statistics of hepatic CCN1 expression in patients with NASH and healthy controls. (C) Hepatic CCN1 was positively associated with the NAFLD activity score (r = 0.64, p = 0.0013). (D) Hepatic CCN1 was positively associated with steatosis (r = 0.56, p = 0.0068). ***P < 0.001.
Figure 3Upregulation of CCN1 aggravates MCD- or HF-induced hepatic steatosis. (A) Hepatic CCN1 mRNA was detected by qPCR in mice after Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1 tail vein injection. (B) CCN1 protein was detected by western blotting in mice after Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1 tail vein injection. (C) H&E staining of liver sections from MCD mice treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. (D) Oil red O staining of liver sections from MCD mice treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. (E) Statistical analysis of the area of steatosis in liver tissues from MCD mice treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. (F) H&E staining of liver sections from HF mice treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. (G) Oil red O staining of liver sections from HF mice treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. (H) Statistical analysis of the area of steatosis in liver tissues from HF mice treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test. The error bar indicates the SD. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 4Heat map of the differentially expressed genes in the livers of MCD mice in the control and CCN1-overexpressing groups by microarray analyses (red: upregulated; green: downregulated).
Figure 5Taxonomic pie chart of fatty acid metabolism-associated genes in CCN1-overexpressing hepatocytes.
Genes significantly influenced in hepatocytes by overexpression of the CCN1 gene through microarray analysis.
| No. | Gene Symbol | Description | Fold-change | Regulation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cfd | Complement factor D (adipsin) (Cfd), transcript variant 2 | 0.0015 | 0.3 | down |
| 2 | Fabp5 | Fatty acid binding protein 5, epidermal (Fabp5), transcript variant 2 | 0.0342 | 0.71 | down |
| 3 | Sirt3 | Sirtuin 3 (Sirt3), transcript variant 2 | 0.0455 | 1.81 | up |
| 4 | Acacb | Acetyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase beta (Acacb) | 0.0016 | 2.54 | up |
| 5 | Cebpd | CCAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), delta (Cebpd) | 0.044 | 1.97 | up |
| 6 | Wnt5b | Wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 5B (Wnt5b), transcript variant 2 | 0.0042 | 2.73 | up |
| 7 | Cdkn1a | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1 A (P21) (Cdkn1a), transcript variant 2 | 0.0003 | 3.4 | up |
| 8 | Cdkn1b | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (Cdkn1b) | 0.0149 | 3.04 | up |
| 9 | Ddit3 | DNA-damage inducible transcript 3 (Ddit3), transcript variant 1 | 0 | 29.35 | up |
| 10 | Hes1 | Hairy and enhancer of split 1 (Drosophila) (Hes1) | 0.0015 | 1.26 | up |
| 11 | Sirt1 | Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1), transcript variant 1 | 0.0074 | 2.05 | up |
| 12 | Sirt2 | Sirtuin 2 (Sirt2), transcript variant 2 | 0.007 | 1.29 | up |
| 13 | Bmp2 | Bone morphogenetic protein 2 (Bmp2) | 0.0003 | 4.73 | up |
| 14 | Klf4 | Kruppel-like factor 4 (gut) (Klf4) | 0.0048 | 3.26 | up |
| 15 | Klf2 | Kruppel-like factor 2 (lung) (Klf2) | 0.007 | 1.82 | up |
| 16 | Creb1 | cAMP responsive element binding protein 1 (Creb1), transcript variant C | 0.0299 | 1.79 | up |
| 17 | Nrf1 | Nuclear respiratory factor 1 (Nrf1), transcript variant 1 | 0.0022 | 1.68 | up |
| 18 | Ppara | Rattus norvegicus peroxisome Proliferator activated receptor alpha (Ppara) | 0.0225 | 1.64 | up |
| 19 | Wnt5a | Wingless-type MMTV integration site family, member 5A (Wnt5a), transcript variant 2 | 0.0024 | 1.46 | up |
| 20 | Ncoa2 | Nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (Ncoa2), transcript variant 2 | 0.0199 | 1.52 | up |
| 21 | Nr1h3 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group H, member 3 (Nr1h3), transcript variant 2 | 0.0111 | 1.4 | up |
| 22 | Rb1 | Retinoblastoma 1 (Rb1) | 0.0067 | 1.92 | up |
| 23 | Twist1 | Twist homolog 1 (Drosophila) (Twist1) | 0.0004 | 4.15 | up |
| 24 | Acat1 | Acetyl-Coenzyme A acetyltransferase 1 (Acat1) | 0.0052 | 2.23 | up |
| 25 | Acat2 | Acetyl-Coenzyme A acetyltransferase 2 (Acat2) | 0.0271 | 1.27 | up |
| 26 | Ehhadh | Enoyl-Coenzyme A, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl Coenzyme A dehydrogenase (Ehhadh) | 0.0009 | 1.77 | up |
| 27 | Acox2 | Acyl-Coenzyme A oxidase 2, branched chain (Acox2), transcript variant 2 | 0.0008 | 2.18 | up |
| 28 | Acsl6 | Acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 6 (Acsl6), transcript variant X1 | 0.0282 | 1.6 | up |
| 29 | Acot2 | Acyl-CoA thioesterase 2 (Acot2) | 0.0062 | 3.02 | up |
| 30 | Eci2 | Enoyl-Coenzyme A delta isomerase 2 (Eci2), transcript variant 1 | 0.0316 | 1.17 | up |
| 31 | Klf15 | Kruppel-like factor 15 (Klf15) | 0.0102 | 2.41 | up |
| 32 | Slc27a3 | Solute carrier family 27 (fatty acid transporter), member 3 (Slc27a3) | 0.0001 | 5.86 | up |
| 33 | Prkab1 | Protein kinase, AMP-activated, beta 1 non-catalytic subunit (Prkab1) | 0.0176 | 2.1 | up |
| 34 | Prkab2 | Protein kinase, AMP-activated, beta 2 non-catalytic subunit (Prkab2) | 0.0317 | 1.34 | up |
| 35 | Prkaca | Protein kinase, cAMP dependent, catalytic, alpha (Prkaca), transcript variant 2 | 0.037 | 1.61 | up |
| 36 | Prkag2 | Protein kinase, AMP-activated, gamma 2 non-catalytic subunit (Prkag2), transcript variant 2 | 0.0265 | 1.64 | up |
| 37 | Prkag3 | Protein kinase, AMP-activated, gamma 3 non-catalytic subunit (Prkag3) | 0.0371 | 2.49 | up |
| 38 | Hmgcl | 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A lyase (Hmgcl) | 0.0419 | 1.37 | up |
| 39 | Oxct2a | 3-Oxoacid CoA transferase 2A (Oxct2a) | 0.012 | 2.43 | up |
| 40 | Gpd2 | Glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase 2, mitochondrial (Gpd2), transcript variant 1 | 0.0201 | 1.51 | up |
Figure 6Downregulation of CCN1 alleviates MCD- or HF-induced hepatic steatosis. (A) Hepatic CCN1 mRNA was detected by qPCR in mice after Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1 tail vein injection. (B) H&E staining of liver sections from MCD mice treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (C) Oil red O staining of liver sections from MCD mice treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (D) Statistical analysis of the area of steatosis in liver tissues from MCD mice treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (E) H&E staining of liver sections from HF mice treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (F) Oil red O staining of liver sections from HF mice treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (G) Statistical analysis of the area of steatosis in liver tissues from HF mice treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test. The error bar indicates the SD. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Figure 7CCN1 exacerbates murine primary hepatocyte steatosis. (A) Oil red O-stained sections of primary hepatocytes treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. (B) Statistical analysis of the TG concentration in murine primary hepatocytes treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. (C) Oil red O-stained sections of primary hepatocytes treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (D) Statistical analysis of the TG concentration in murine primary hepatocytes treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (E) Expression of TNF-α was quantified in primary hepatocytes of Ad-GFP group and Ad-CCN1group. (F) Expression of MCP-1 was quantified in primary hepatocytes of Ad-GFP group and Ad-CCN1group. (G) Expression of IL-10 was quantified in primary hepatocytes of Ad-GFP group and Ad-CCN1 group. Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test. The error bar indicates the SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns: no significance.
Figure 8CCN1 aggravates hepatic inflammation and promotes macrophage infiltration during NASH development. (A) Statistical analysis of inflammatory foci in liver tissues from MCD mice treated with Ad-GFP or Ad-CCN1. (B) Statistical analysis of the area of steatosis in liver tissues from MCD mice treated with Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (C,D) Representative F4/80 immunohistochemistry from MCD mice treated with Ad-GFP, Ad-CCN1, Ad-shGFP or Ad-shCCN1. (E) Quantification of F4/80-positive cells is shown as the total number of positive cells per field. Statistical significance was assessed by two-tailed Student’s t test. The error bar indicates the SD. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Figure 9Apoptotic proteins were detected by western blot.