Literature DB >> 32080805

Free-choice and forced-choice actions: Shared representations and conservation of cognitive effort.

Benjamin Richardson1, Roland Pfister2, Lisa R Fournier3.   

Abstract

We examined two questions regarding the interplay of planned and ongoing actions. First: Do endogenous (free-choice) and exogenous (forced-choice) triggers of action plans activate similar cognitive representations? And, second: Are free-choice decisions biased by future action goals retained in working memory? Participants planned and retained a forced-choice action to one visual event (A) while executing an immediate forced-choice or free-choice action (action B) to a second visual event (B); then the retained action (A) was executed. We found performance costs for action B if the two action plans partly overlapped versus did not overlap (partial repetition costs). This held true even when action B required a free-choice response indicating that forced-choice and free-choice actions are represented similarly. Partial repetition costs for free-choice actions were evident regardless of whether participants did or did not show free-choice response biases. Also, a subset of participants showed a bias to freely choose actions that did not overlap (vs. did overlap) with the action plan retained in memory, which led to improved performance in executing action B and recalling action A. Because cognitive effort is likely required to resolve feature code competition and confusion assumed to underlie partial repetition costs, this free-choice decision bias may serve to conserve cognitive effort and preserve the future action goal retained in working memory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action overlap; Action planning; Cognitive effort; Feature binding; Free choice; Partial-repetition costs

Year:  2020        PMID: 32080805     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-01986-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  3 in total

1.  Are freely chosen actions generated by stimulus codes or effect codes?

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Christoph Naefgen; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Enhancing free choice masked priming via switch trials during repeated practice.

Authors:  Qi Dai; Lichang Yao; Qiong Wu; Yiyang Yu; Wen Li; Jiajia Yang; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-08

3.  Partial Repetition Costs are Reduced but not Eliminated with Practice.

Authors:  Lisa R Fournier; Benjamin P Richardson; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-06-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.