Literature DB >> 32080356

Competition experiments in a soil microcosm reveal the impact of genetic and biotic factors on natural yeast populations.

Clara Bleuven1,2,3,4, Guillaume Q Nguyen5,6,7, Philippe C Després6,8,9,10, Marie Filteau6,7, Christian R Landry11,12,13,14,15.   

Abstract

The ability to measure microbial fitness directly in natural conditions and in interaction with other microbes is a challenge that needs to be overcome if we want to gain a better understanding of microbial fitness determinants in nature. Here we investigate the influence of the natural microbial community on the relative fitness of the North American populations SpB, SpC and SpC* of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus using DNA barcodes and a soil microcosm derived from soil associated with oak trees. We find that variation in fitness among these genetically distinct groups is influenced by the microbial community. Altering the microbial community load and diversity with an irradiation treatment significantly diminishes the magnitude of fitness differences among populations. Our findings suggest that microbial interactions could affect the evolution of yeast lineages in nature by modulating variation in fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32080356      PMCID: PMC7242384          DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-0612-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  43 in total

1.  An experimental test of local adaptation in soil bacteria.

Authors:  Dorothée Belotte; Jean-Baptiste Curien; R Craig Maclean; Graham Bell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Local adaptation of bacteriophages to their bacterial hosts in soil.

Authors:  Michiel Vos; Philip J Birkett; Elizabeth Birch; Robert I Griffiths; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Molecular and cellular bases of adaptation to a changing environment in microorganisms.

Authors:  Clara Bleuven; Christian R Landry
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Accounting for local adaptation in ectomycorrhizas: a call to track geographical origin of plants, fungi, and soils in experiments.

Authors:  Megan A Rúa; Louis J Lamit; Catherine Gehring; Pedro M Antunes; Jason D Hoeksema; Cathy Zabinski; Justine Karst; Cole Burns; Michaela J Woods
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.387

Review 5.  Yeast: an experimental organism for 21st Century biology.

Authors:  David Botstein; Gerald R Fink
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Cheese rind communities provide tractable systems for in situ and in vitro studies of microbial diversity.

Authors:  Benjamin E Wolfe; Julie E Button; Marcela Santarelli; Rachel J Dutton
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Species interactions alter evolutionary responses to a novel environment.

Authors:  Diane Lawrence; Francesca Fiegna; Volker Behrends; Jacob G Bundy; Albert B Phillimore; Thomas Bell; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Evolution of species interactions determines microbial community productivity in new environments.

Authors:  Francesca Fiegna; Alejandra Moreno-Letelier; Thomas Bell; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Species Deletions from Microbiome Consortia Reveal Key Metabolic Interactions between Gut Microbes.

Authors:  Natalia Gutiérrez; Daniel Garrido
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 6.496

10.  Deciphering microbial interactions in synthetic human gut microbiome communities.

Authors:  Ophelia S Venturelli; Alex C Carr; Garth Fisher; Ryan H Hsu; Rebecca Lau; Benjamin P Bowen; Susan Hromada; Trent Northen; Adam P Arkin
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 11.429

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Intraspecies heterogeneity in microbial interactions.

Authors:  Dallas L Mould; Deborah A Hogan
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 7.584

2.  Forest Saccharomyces paradoxus are robust to seasonal biotic and abiotic changes.

Authors:  Primrose J Boynton; Dominika Wloch-Salamon; Doreen Landermann; Eva H Stukenbrock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.