| Literature DB >> 32080087 |
Huijie Gu1, Zhongyue Huang, Guangnan Chen, Kaifeng Zhou, Yiming Zhang, Jiong Chen, Jun Xu, Xiaofan Yin.
Abstract
Osteoporosis (OP) is a disease characterized by bone mass loss, bone microstructure damage, increased bone fragility, and easy fracture. The molecular mechanism underlying OP remains unclear.In this study, we identified 217 genes associated with OP, and formed a gene set [OP-related genes gene set (OPgset)].The highly enriched GOs and pathways showed OPgset genes were significantly involved in multiple biological processes (skeletal system development, ossification, and osteoblast differentiation), and several OP-related pathways (Wnt signaling pathway, osteoclast differentiation, steroid hormone biosynthesis, and adipocytokine signaling pathway). Besides, pathway crosstalk analysis indicated three major modules, with first module consisted of pathways mainly involved in bone development-related signaling pathways, second module in Wnt-related signaling pathway and third module in metabolic pathways. Further, we calculated degree centrality of a node and selected ten key genes/proteins, including TGFB1, IL6, WNT3A, TNF, PTH, TP53, WNT1, IGF1, IL10, and SERPINE1. We analyze the K-core and construct three k-core sub-networks of OPgset genes.In summary, we for the first time explored the molecular mechanism underlying OP via network- and pathway-based methods, results from our study will improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of OP. In addition, these methods performed in this study can be used to explore pathogenesis and genes related to a specific disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32080087 PMCID: PMC7034680 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019120
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Pathway crosstalk among OSgset-enriched pathways. Nodes represent pathways, and edges represent crosstalk between pathways. Edge-width corresponds to the score of specific pathway pair. Larger edge-width indicated higher score. Node-size corresponds to the degree of pathway. Larger node-size indicated higher degree.
Figure 2Protein-protein interaction networks of OSgset. The PPI data were obtained from STRING. A confidence score that calculated for all protein interactions based on experimentally and computationally interaction was set as the highest (>0.9). Then, we applied Cytoscape (Version 3.6.1) to visualize the networks. Nodes represent genes, and edges represent interaction between genes. Edge-width corresponds to the combined score of specific genes pair. Larger edge-width indicated higher score. Node-size corresponds to the degree of pathway. Larger node-size indicated higher degree. PPI = protein-protein interaction.
Information of sub-networks.
Figure 3The GO terms interaction network of “1” sub-network (A). GO terms displayed as an interaction network using Cytoscape plug-in BinGO. Yellow nodes: nodes with P-value < 0.01 and Benjamini corrected P-value < 0.01. Biological function and pathway analysis of “1” sub-network. (B) The significant changes in the GO biological process. (C) The significant changes in the pathway.
Figure 4The GO terms interaction network of “2” sub-network (A). GO terms displayed as an interaction network using Cytoscape plug-in BinGO. Yellow nodes: nodes with P-value < 0.01 and Benjamini corrected P-value < .01. Biological function and pathway analysis of “2” sub-network. (B) The significant changes in the GO biological process. (C) The significant changes in the pathway.
Figure 5The GO terms interaction network of “3” sub-network (A). GO terms displayed as an interaction network using Cytoscape plug-in BinGO. Yellow nodes: nodes with P-value < .01 and Benjamini corrected P-value < .01. Biological function and pathway analysis of “3” sub-network. (B) The significant changes in the GO biological process. (C) The significant changes in the pathway.