Literature DB >> 32080023

The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Technology in Right Posterior Sectionectomy.

Dilai Luo1, Xiaoli Xiong2, Hu Xiong1, Hongliang Liu1, Yong Huang1, Mingwen Huang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been accepted widely due to its advantages as a minimally invasive surgery, but laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (LRPS) has rarely been reported. We aimed to explore the safety and feasibility of LRPS by comparing it with open surgical approaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and July 2019, 51 patients who underwent right posterior sectionectomy were enrolled in this study. The patients' characteristics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were compared between 2 groups.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the preoperative data. LRPS showed significantly less blood loss (P=0.001) and shorter hospital stay (P=0.002) than open right posterior sectionectomy, but hospital expenses (P=0.382), operative time (P=0.196), surgical margin (P=0.311), the rate of other complications, and the postoperative white blood cell count, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin showed no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups (P>0.05). For hepatocellular carcinoma, the results showed there were no differences in both disease-free survival (P=0.220) and overall survival (P=0.417) between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our research suggests that LRPS is a safe and feasible surgical procedure that is efficient from an oncological point of view. It may be the preferred choice for lesions in the right posterior hepatic lobe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32080023     DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.719


  3 in total

1.  Safety and feasibility for laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zigang Ding; Lingpeng Liu; Bangran Xu; Yong Huang; Hu Xiong; Dilai Luo; Mingwen Huang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Comparative analysis of the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open caudate lobe resection.

Authors:  Zigang Ding; Yong Huang; Lingpeng Liu; Bangran Xu; Hu Xiong; Dilai Luo; Mingwen Huang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  International multicentre propensity score-matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy.

Authors:  Adrian K H Chiow; David Fuks; Gi-Hong Choi; Nicholas Syn; Iswanto Sucandy; Marco V Marino; Mikel Prieto; Charing C Chong; Jae Hoon Lee; Mikhail Efanov; T Peter Kingham; Sung Hoon Choi; Robert P Sutcliffe; Roberto I Troisi; Johann Pratschke; Tan-To Cheung; Xiaoying Wang; Rong Liu; Mathieu D'Hondt; Chung-Yip Chan; Chung Ngai Tang; Ho-Seong Han; Brian K P Goh
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.939

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.