| Literature DB >> 32079275 |
Feng Zhang1, Guang Feng2,3, Mengyun Hu1,3, Yanwei Huang1,3, Heping Zeng1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Defect engineering in photocatalysts recently exhibits promising performances in solar-energy-driven reactions. However, defect engineering techniques developed so far rely on complicated synthesis processes and harsh experimental conditions, which seriously hinder its practical applications. In this work, we demonstrated a facile mass-production approach to synthesize gray titania with engineered surface defects. This technique just requires a simple liquid-plasma treatment under low temperature and atmospheric pressure. The in situ generation of hydrogen atoms caused by liquid plasma is responsible for hydrogenation of TiO2. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements confirm the existence of surface oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ species in gray TiO2-x. Both kinds of defects concentrations are well controllable and increase with the output plasma power. UV-Vis diffused reflectance spectra show that the bandgap of gray TiO2-x is 2.9 eV. Due to its extended visible-light absorption and engineered surface defects, gray TiO2-x exhibits superior visible-light photoactivity. Rhodamine B was used to evaluate the visible-light photodegradation performance, which shows that the removal rate constant of gray TiO2-x reaches 0.126 min-1 and is 6.5 times of P25 TiO2. The surface defects produced by liquid-plasma hydrogenation are proved stable in air and water and could be a candidate hydrogenation strategy for other photocatalysts.Entities:
Keywords: gray titania; liquid plasma; oxygen vacancy; surface defect; visible light
Year: 2020 PMID: 32079275 PMCID: PMC7075135 DOI: 10.3390/nano10020342
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(A) The setup for liquid plasma generation, (B) digital picture of as-produced liquid plasma, and (C) digital pictures for gray titanium dioxide (TiO2−x) and pristine white TiO2.
Figure 2The synthesis mechanism of gray TiO2−x nanosphere assisted by liquid plasma and the corresponding optical emission spectrum originated from cathodic Ti electrodes.
Figure 3XRD diffraction patterns of gray TiO2−x samples prepared with different glow discharge powers, and black line refers to anatase TiO2.
Figure 4TEM images of (A,C) pristine TiO2 and (B,D) gray TiO2−x.
Figure 5(A) UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of as-prepared samples and the digital photos shown in the inset. (B) The plot of (αhν)1/2 versus hν using the Kubelka–Munk function.
Figure 6Raman spectra of pristine TiO2 and gray TiO2−x. The inset shows an enlarged view of Eg mode of pristine TiO2 and gray TiO2−x.
Figure 7(A) XPS survey spectra, (B) Ti 2p XPS spectra, and (C) O 1s XPS spectra of samples.
Figure 8EPR(Electron paramagnetic resonance) spectra of the as-synthesized gray TiO2−x samples obtained with different plasma discharge powers.
Figure 9(A) Photocatalytic degradation curves of RhB(Rhodamine B) over different photocatalysts under visible-light irradiation. (B) The pseudo-first-order reaction rate constant for all samples. (C) Recycling test results using GT-480 as the photocatalyst. (D) Photodegradation rates of methyl orange and phenol with TiO2 and GT-480 under visible-light irradiation.
Comparison of rhodamine B photodegradation efficiency over gray TiO2−x with reported colored titania and highly efficient photocatalysts.
| Photocatalyst | Synthesis Method | Light Source | CRhB | WCat | Performance | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gray TiO2 | Liquid-plasma hydrogenation of anatase TiO2 | Visible light | 50 mL RhB, 20 ppm | 50 mg | T90% = 20 min | This work |
| Black TiO2 | Hydrogen plasma assisted chemical vapor deposition | Solar light | 50 mL RhB, 2 mg/L | 10 mg | T90% = 20 min | [ |
| Blue TiO2 | Hydrothermal treatment and annealing in argon environment | Visible light | 30 mL RhB, 10 mg/L | 20 mg | T90% = 150 min | [ |
| Blue TiO2 | Solvothermal reaction with TiCl3 solution | Visible light | 50 mL RhB, 10 mg/L | 100 mg | T90% = 110 min | [ |
| Black TiO2 | Ultraviolet light irradiation and low temperature annealing | Solar light | 40 mL RhB, 4×10−5 M | 10 mg | T90% = 130 min | [ |
| Gray TiO2 | Anodization and liquid plasma hydrogenation | Visible light | 50 mL RhB, 20 ppm | 50 mg | T90% = 70 min | [ |
| Brown TiO2 | Noble metal deposited on defective TiO2−x | Visible light | 10 uM RhB, 80 mL | 80 mg | T90% = 120 min | [ |
| Gray TiO2 | Hydrogen plasma-treated nanoporous TiO2 | Solar light | 3 mg/mL RhB, | 0.5 g/L | T90% = 90 min | [ |
| Black TiO2 | Reduced by NaBH4 under argon atmosphere. | Solar light | 50 mL RhB, 5 ppm | 50 mg | T90% = 50 min | [ |
| Ar-TiO2 | Argon plasma treatments in a dielectric barrier discharge | Visible light | 100 mL RhB 10 mg/L | 50 mg | T90% = 90 min | [ |
| Graphene-P25 | Hydrothermal reaction of graphene and P25 | Solar light | 100 mL RhB, 0.03 mmol/L | 6.3 mg | T90% = 15 min | [ |
| Pt-doped nanoporous TiO2 | Sol-gel hydrothermal and annealing under H2 atmosphere | 320–500 nm | 10 mL RhB, 10 ppm | 3 mg | T90% > 180 min | [ |
CRhB: Initial RhB concentration; Wcat: Catalyst usage; and T90%: Time 90% conversion of RhB; Ref.: Reference.