| Literature DB >> 32079192 |
Wei Ma1, Sen Du1, Shumin Yan1, Xiaolin Yu1, Zhongjian Zhang1, Shufen Zhang1.
Abstract
Modification of cotton fabric with 2-methacryloyloxyethyltrimethyl ammonium chloride (DMC) was achieved through free-radical initiated graft polymerization with K2S2O8/NaHSO3 as the initiator. Grafting of DMC was confirmed by ATR-IR of the modified cotton. The optimal grafting reaction conditions, including DMC dosage, mole ratio of initiator to DMC, temperature, and time, were determined by cation content and dye fixation results of the modified cotton. The modified fibers were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and whiteness measurement. Salt-free dyeing of the modified cotton with commonly used C. I. Reactive Blue 19, C. I. Reactive Yellow 145, and C. I. Reactive Red 195 presented high fixation of 96.8%, 98.7%, and 97.3%, respectively. These results indicated that the modification is effective for changing the surface charge of the fiber and increasing the dye-fiber reactivity. The color fastness and strength property were still very satisfactory. With excellent properties, this dyeing method shows promise in real application for eliminating the usage of salt and reducing environmental pollution.Entities:
Keywords: cotton fabric; graft copolymerization; modification; reactive dyes; salt-free dyeing
Year: 2020 PMID: 32079192 PMCID: PMC7077700 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1(a) Formation of free radicals; (b) reaction mechanism of grafting DMC onto cotton fiber in the presence of K2S2O8/NaHSO3; (c) homopolymerization of DMC.
Figure 2Influence of (a) mole ratio of K2S2O8 to DMC (concentration of DMC is 50 g/L, T = 40 °C and t = 3 h); (b) reaction temperature (concentration of DMC is 50 g/L, mole ratio of K2S2O8 to DMC is 0.01:1 and t = 3 h); and (c) reaction time (concentration of DMC is 50 g/L, mole ratio of K2S2O8 to DMC is 0.01:1 and T = 30 °C) on the DS of cotton and E% of C. I. Reactive Blue 19. (d) Influence of DMC concentration on DS and E% of C. I. Reactive Blue 19 (E1), C. I. Reactive Red 195 (E2) and C. I. Reactive Yellow 145 (E3) (mole ratio of K2S2O8 to DMC is 0.01:1, T = 30 °C and t = 1 h).
Figure 3(a) ATR-IR spectra of the original (I) and the modified cotton fibers (II); (b) X-ray diffraction patterns of the original (I) and the modified cotton fibers (II); (c,e) SEM images of the original cotton fibers and (d,f) SEM images of the modified cotton fibers ((c,d) ×1000, (e,f) ×5000).
Colorimetric properties, whiteness, and yellowness of the original and modified cotton
| Cotton | K/S | L* | a* | b* | Whiteness | Yellowness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original | 0.1 | 94.2 | −0.8 | 0.8 | 81.0 | 1.4 |
| Modified | 0.1 | 94.1 | −0.7 | 0.7 | 81.5 | 1.1 |
L*: brightness; a*: red–green value; b*: yellow–blue value.
Figure 4Dyeing samples of C. I. Reactive Blue 19, C. I. Reactive Yellow 145 and C. I. Reactive Red 195 on original and modified cotton fabrics: (a–c) on original cotton with the conventional dyeing method, (d–f) on modified cotton with the salt-free dyeing method.
Dyeing properties of DMC-modified and original cotton
| Dyes | No. | E% | R% | F% | K/S | Wash Fastness | Rub Fastness | Light Fastness | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staining | Change | Dry | Wet | ||||||||
| Cotton | Wool | ||||||||||
| C. I. Reactive Blue 19 | 1 | 99.9 | 96.9 | 96.8 | 11.5 | 4–5 | 3 | 4 | 4–5 | 4 | 7 |
| 2 | 81.1 | 82.8 | 67.2 | 9.7 | 4–5 | 3 | 4 | 4–5 | 4 | 6–7 | |
| C. I. Reactive Yellow 145 | 1 | 99.8 | 98.9 | 98.7 | 4.2 | 4–5 | 4–5 | 4–5 | 4–5 | 4 | 5–6 |
| 2 | 96.7 | 78.4 | 75.8 | 3.7 | 4–5 | 4 | 4–5 | 4–5 | 4 | 4–5 | |
| C. I. Reactive Red 195 | 1 | 99.7 | 97.6 | 97.3 | 11.3 | 4–5 | 4 | 4–5 | 4 | 3 | 3–4 |
| 2 | 91.0 | 87.0 | 79.2 | 8.5 | 4–5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3–4 | 2–3 | |
1: DMC modified cotton, salt-free dyeing; 2: original cotton, conventional dyeing.
Mechanical strength of the original and DMC-modified cotton
| Cotton | Tensile Strength/N | Tearing Strength/N | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warp | Weft | Warp | Weft | |
| Original ( | 536.2 | 496.0 | 11.2 | 10.6 |
| Modified ( | 523.5 | 482.4 | 11.0 | 10.6 |
| Dec% | −2.4 | −2.7 | −1.8 | 0 |
Dec% = (N0 − N1)/N0 × 100%.
Mechanical strength of the original and modified cotton dyed with reactive dyes
| Cotton | Tensile Strength /N | Tearing Strength /N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warp | Weft | Warp | Weft | ||
| Undyed and original | 536.2 | 496.0 | 11.2 | 10.6 | |
| Dyed with C. I. Reactive Blue 19 | 1 | 518.7 | 481.3 | 11.1 | 10.2 |
| 2 | 528.7 | 472.2 | 10.6 | 10.1 | |
| Dyed with C. I. Reactive Yellow 145 | 1 | 513.4 | 489.9 | 10.9 | 10.9 |
| 2 | 535.8 | 482.0 | 10.8 | 10.2 | |
| Dyed with C. I. Reactive Red 195 | 1 | 519.0 | 489.3 | 10.8 | 10.6 |
| 2 | 514.9 | 473.2 | 10.7 | 10.2 | |
1: Modified cotton with salt-free dyeing method; 2: original cotton with conventional dyeing method.