Literature DB >> 32078817

General health and residential proximity to the coast in Belgium: Results from a cross-sectional health survey.

Alexander Hooyberg1, Henk Roose2, James Grellier3, Lewis R Elliott4, Britt Lonneville5, Mathew P White6, Nathalie Michels7, Stefaan De Henauw8, Michiel Vandegehuchte9, Gert Everaert10.   

Abstract

The health risks of coastal areas have long been researched, but the potential benefits for health are only recently being explored. The present study compared the general health of Belgian citizens a) according to the EU's definition of coastal (<50 km) vs. inland (>50 km), and b) between eight more refined categories of residential proximity to the coast (<5 km to >250 km). Data was drawn from the Belgian Health Interview Survey (n = 60,939) and investigated using linear regression models and mediation analyses on several hypothesized mechanisms. Results indicated that populations living <5 km of the coast reported better general health than populations living at >50-100 km. Four commonly hypothesized mechanisms were considered but no indirect associations were found: scores for mental health, physical activity levels and social contacts were not higher at 0-5 km from the coast, and air pollution (PM10 concentrations) was lower at 0-5 km from the coast but not statistically associated with better health. Results are controlled for typical variables such as age, sex, income, neighbourhood levels of green and freshwater blue space, etc. The spatial urban-rural-nature mosaic at the Belgian coast and alternative explanations are discussed. The positive associations between the ocean and human health observed in this study encourage policy makers to manage coastal areas sustainably to maintain associated public health benefits into the future.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Blue space; Mental health; Physical activity; Social interactions

Year:  2020        PMID: 32078817     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  5 in total

Review 1.  Beneficial Use Impairments, Degradation of Aesthetics, and Human Health: A Review.

Authors:  Erik D Slawsky; Joel C Hoffman; Kristen N Cowan; Kristen M Rappazzo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  The Restorative Potential of Icelandic Nature.

Authors:  Harpa Lind Kristjánsdóttir; Sigrún Sigurðardóttir; Anna María Pálsdóttir
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Meaningful activities during COVID-19 lockdown and association with mental health in Belgian adults.

Authors:  Cruyt Ellen; De Vriendt Patricia; De Letter Miet; Vlerick Peter; Calders Patrick; De Pauw Robby; Oostra Kristine; Rodriguez-Bailón Maria; Szmalec Arnaud; Merchán-Baeza Jose Antonio; Fernández-Solano Ana Judit; Vidaña-Moya Laura; Van de Velde Dominique
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  A Qualitative Study on Emotions Experienced at the Coast and Their Influence on Well-Being.

Authors:  Marine I Severin; Filip Raes; Evie Notebaert; Luka Lambrecht; Gert Everaert; Ann Buysse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-10

5.  Mechanisms of Impact of Blue Spaces on Human Health: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michail Georgiou; Gordon Morison; Niamh Smith; Zoë Tieges; Sebastien Chastin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.