Literature DB >> 32077964

Humeral Shaft Fracture Healing Rates in Older Patients.

Frederic H Pollock, J P Maurer, Aaron Sop, Jonathan Callegai, Mike Broce, Maher Kali, Jeffrey F Spindel.   

Abstract

Nonoperative treatment has become the standard of care for the majority of humeral shaft fractures. Published studies have mainly come from trauma centers with a young cohort of patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the nonunion rate of humeral shaft fractures in patients older than 55 years. A retrospective study was performed on a group of orthopedic trauma group treated at a level I trauma center during a 10-year period (2007-2017). Patients 55 years or older and treated for a humeral shaft fracture nonoperatively, with or without manipulation, were identified. Nonunion was defined by no bridging callus radiographically or by gross motion at the fracture at least 12 weeks from injury. There were 31 patients identified with humeral shaft fractures who met the inclusion criteria. The cohort included 21 (67.7%) females and 10 (32.3%) males with a mean age of 72.5 years (range, 55-92 years). Twenty-one fractures went on to union, and there were 10 nonunions, with no significant differences in the demographics or comorbidities. There was no correlation between AO/OTA fracture classification or fracture location and union status. There was a tendency toward higher risk of nonunion in proximal third humeral shaft fractures (45%) compared with middle (26%) and distal third (20%) humeral shaft fractures, although this was not statistically significant. The overall nonunion rate for humeral shaft fractures was 32% for patients older than 55 years. The authors found a significant correlation between age and union rate: as age increased, union rate decreased (R=-0.9, P=.045). The incidence of humeral shaft nonunion in patients older than 55 years was significantly higher than that of younger adults. To the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to report a significant correlation between nonunion and increased age. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(x);xx-xx.]. Copyright 2020, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32077964     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20200213-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  3 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor on: "Open plate fixation versus nailing for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised clinical trials and observational studies".

Authors:  Oriol Pujol; Jorge Nuñez; Lledó Batalla; Montse Garcia-Portabella; Josep Massons
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)-a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dennis Karimi; Stig Brorson; Kaare S Midtgaard; Tore Fjalestad; Aksel Paulsen; Per Olerud; Carl Ekholm; Olof Wolf; Bjarke Viberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  Technical considerations and early results of magnetic compressive intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft delayed unions and nonunions.

Authors:  Daniel J Cognetti; Abdullah Ghali; Jose M Gutierrez-Naranjo; Jordan Handcox; Ravi Karia; Anil K Dutta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-01-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.