AIM: Serodiagnosis of Fasciola gigantica natural infection in buffaloes with recombinant cathepsin L1-D and native cathepsin-L protease antigens. METHODS: The recombinant cat L1-D antigen was expressed in prokaryotic expression system and native cathepsin-L proteases were purified by alcoholic fractionation from adult F. gigantica flukes. Buffaloes (n = 325) were screened for anti-Fasciola antibodies with the above antigens in immunoglobulin-G-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (IgG-ELISA). RESULTS: The recombinant cat L1-D antigen showed positive reactivity with 101/122 necropsy positive animals but 21/122 necropsy confirmed positive animals were negative in this ELISA (sensitivity 82.8%). However, 30/203 (14.8%) necropsy negative animals for Fasciola were seropositive with specificity of 85.2%. With native cat-L protease, 104/122 necropsy confirmed positive animals were ELISA positive but 18/122 necropsy positive animals were seronegative, thereby depicting the sensitivity of 85.2%. But ELISA with this antigen showed 27/203 (13.3%) necropsy negative animals as positive (specificity 86.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Comparative evaluation of both the antigens showed that they are suitable for serodiagnosis of F. gigantica infection in buffalo herds.
AIM: Serodiagnosis of Fasciola gigantica natural infection in buffaloes with recombinant cathepsin L1-D and native cathepsin-L protease antigens. METHODS: The recombinant cat L1-D antigen was expressed in prokaryotic expression system and native cathepsin-L proteases were purified by alcoholic fractionation from adult F. gigantica flukes. Buffaloes (n = 325) were screened for anti-Fasciola antibodies with the above antigens in immunoglobulin-G-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (IgG-ELISA). RESULTS: The recombinant cat L1-D antigen showed positive reactivity with 101/122 necropsy positive animals but 21/122 necropsy confirmed positive animals were negative in this ELISA (sensitivity 82.8%). However, 30/203 (14.8%) necropsy negative animals for Fasciola were seropositive with specificity of 85.2%. With native cat-L protease, 104/122 necropsy confirmed positive animals were ELISA positive but 18/122 necropsy positive animals were seronegative, thereby depicting the sensitivity of 85.2%. But ELISA with this antigen showed 27/203 (13.3%) necropsy negative animals as positive (specificity 86.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Comparative evaluation of both the antigens showed that they are suitable for serodiagnosis of F. giganticainfection in buffalo herds.