Literature DB >> 32076218

Closed-loop optimization of fast-charging protocols for batteries with machine learning.

Peter M Attia1, Aditya Grover2, Norman Jin1, Kristen A Severson3, Todor M Markov2, Yang-Hung Liao1, Michael H Chen1, Bryan Cheong1,2, Nicholas Perkins1, Zi Yang1, Patrick K Herring4, Muratahan Aykol4, Stephen J Harris1,5, Richard D Braatz6, Stefano Ermon7, William C Chueh8,9.   

Abstract

Simultaneously optimizing many design parameters in time-consuming experiments causes bottlenecks in a broad range of scientific and engineering disciplines1,2. One such example is process and control optimization for lithium-ion batteries during materials selection, cell manufacturing and operation. A typical objective is to maximize battery lifetime; however, conducting even a single experiment to evaluate lifetime can take months to years3-5. Furthermore, both large parameter spaces and high sampling variability3,6,7 necessitate a large number of experiments. Hence, the key challenge is to reduce both the number and the duration of the experiments required. Here we develop and demonstrate a machine learning methodology  to efficiently optimize a parameter space specifying the current and voltage profiles of six-step, ten-minute fast-charging protocols for maximizing battery cycle life, which can alleviate range anxiety for electric-vehicle users8,9. We combine two key elements to reduce the optimization cost: an early-prediction model5, which reduces the time per experiment by predicting the final cycle life using data from the first few cycles, and a Bayesian optimization algorithm10,11, which reduces the number of experiments by balancing exploration and exploitation to efficiently probe the parameter space of charging protocols. Using this methodology, we rapidly identify high-cycle-life charging protocols among 224 candidates in 16 days (compared with over 500 days using exhaustive search without early prediction), and subsequently validate the accuracy and efficiency of our optimization approach. Our closed-loop methodology automatically incorporates feedback from past experiments to inform future decisions and can be generalized to other applications in battery design and, more broadly, other scientific domains that involve time-intensive experiments and multi-dimensional design spaces.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32076218     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1994-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  15 in total

1.  Neuromorphic learning with Mott insulator NiO.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Sandip Mondal; Subhasish Mandal; Jason M Allred; Neda Alsadat Aghamiri; Alireza Fali; Zhan Zhang; Hua Zhou; Hui Cao; Fanny Rodolakis; Jessica L McChesney; Qi Wang; Yifei Sun; Yohannes Abate; Kaushik Roy; Karin M Rabe; Shriram Ramanathan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence Applied to Battery Research: Hype or Reality?

Authors:  Teo Lombardo; Marc Duquesnoy; Hassna El-Bouysidy; Fabian Årén; Alfonso Gallo-Bueno; Peter Bjørn Jørgensen; Arghya Bhowmik; Arnaud Demortière; Elixabete Ayerbe; Francisco Alcaide; Marine Reynaud; Javier Carrasco; Alexis Grimaud; Chao Zhang; Tejs Vegge; Patrik Johansson; Alejandro A Franco
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 72.087

3.  A generic battery-cycling optimization framework with learned sampling and early stopping strategies.

Authors:  Changyu Deng; Andrew Kim; Wei Lu
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 4.  Machine learning for flow batteries: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Tianyu Li; Changkun Zhang; Xianfeng Li
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 9.969

Review 5.  Theory-guided experimental design in battery materials research.

Authors:  Alex Yong Sheng Eng; Chhail Bihari Soni; Yanwei Lum; Edwin Khoo; Zhenpeng Yao; S K Vineeth; Vipin Kumar; Jun Lu; Christopher S Johnson; Christopher Wolverton; Zhi Wei Seh
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 14.957

Review 6.  Machine learning toward advanced energy storage devices and systems.

Authors:  Tianhan Gao; Wei Lu
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-12-13

Review 7.  How Machine Learning Will Revolutionize Electrochemical Sciences.

Authors:  Aashutosh Mistry; Alejandro A Franco; Samuel J Cooper; Scott A Roberts; Venkatasubramanian Viswanathan
Journal:  ACS Energy Lett       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 23.101

8.  Machine learning-accelerated design and synthesis of polyelemental heterostructures.

Authors:  Carolin B Wahl; Muratahan Aykol; Jordan H Swisher; Joseph H Montoya; Santosh K Suram; Chad A Mirkin
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Data-driven prediction of battery failure for electric vehicles.

Authors:  Jingyuan Zhao; Heping Ling; Junbin Wang; Andrew F Burke; Yubo Lian
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-03-28

10.  Data-driven capacity estimation of commercial lithium-ion batteries from voltage relaxation.

Authors:  Jiangong Zhu; Yixiu Wang; Yuan Huang; R Bhushan Gopaluni; Yankai Cao; Michael Heere; Martin J Mühlbauer; Liuda Mereacre; Haifeng Dai; Xinhua Liu; Anatoliy Senyshyn; Xuezhe Wei; Michael Knapp; Helmut Ehrenberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 17.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.