Vivian Marques Miguel Suen1, Miguel Alonso-Alonso2, Priscila Giacomo Fassini3,1, Sai Krupa Das4, Greta Magerowski3, Júlio Sérgio Marchini1, Wilson Araújo da Silva Junior1, Isabela Rozatte da Silva1, Rafaella de Souza Ribeiro Salgueiro1, Cássia Dias Machado1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, Bairro Monte Alegre, CEP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil. 2. Laboratory of Bariatric and Nutritional Neuroscience, Center for the Study of Nutrition Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. migalonsoalonso@alumni.harvard.edu. 3. Laboratory of Bariatric and Nutritional Neuroscience, Center for the Study of Nutrition Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 4. Energy Metabolism Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Center on Aging, Tufts University, 711 Washington Street, Boston, MA, 02111-1524, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Obesity is associated with reduced neurocognitive performance. Individuals with obesity show decreased activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a key brain region relevant to the regulation of eating behavior. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a potential technique to correct these abnormalities. However, there is limited information to date, particularly in clinical settings and regarding long-term effects of tDCS. This study aimed to investigate the effects of DLPFC-targeted tDCS in young women with obesity. SUBJECT/ METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled parallel-design clinical trial conducted in 38 women, aged 20-40 years, with BMI 30-35 kg/m2. STUDY DESIGN: Phase I: target engagement (immediate effects of tDCS on working memory performance), Phase II: tDCS only (ten sessions, 2 weeks), Phase III: tDCS + hypocaloric diet (six sessions, 30% energy intake reduction, 2 weeks, inpatient), Phase IV: follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME: change in body weight. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: change in eating behavior and appetite. Additional analyses: effect of Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) gene variability. Data were analyzed as linear mixed models. RESULTS: There was no group difference in change in body weight during the tDCS intervention. At follow-up, the active group lost less weight than the sham group. In addition, the active group regained weight at 6-month follow-up, compared with sham. Genetic analysis indicated that COMT Met noncarriers were the subgroup that accounted for this paradoxical response in the active group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in young women with class I obesity, tDCS targeted to the DLPFC does not facilitate weight loss. Indeed, we found indications that tDCS could have a paradoxical effect in this population, possibly connected with individual differences in dopamine availability. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Obesity is associated with reduced neurocognitive performance. Individuals with obesity show decreased activation in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a key brain region relevant to the regulation of eating behavior. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a potential technique to correct these abnormalities. However, there is limited information to date, particularly in clinical settings and regarding long-term effects of tDCS. This study aimed to investigate the effects of DLPFC-targeted tDCS in young women with obesity. SUBJECT/ METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled parallel-design clinical trial conducted in 38 women, aged 20-40 years, with BMI 30-35 kg/m2. STUDY DESIGN: Phase I: target engagement (immediate effects of tDCS on working memory performance), Phase II: tDCS only (ten sessions, 2 weeks), Phase III: tDCS + hypocaloric diet (six sessions, 30% energy intake reduction, 2 weeks, inpatient), Phase IV: follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME: change in body weight. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: change in eating behavior and appetite. Additional analyses: effect of Catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) gene variability. Data were analyzed as linear mixed models. RESULTS: There was no group difference in change in body weight during the tDCS intervention. At follow-up, the active group lost less weight than the sham group. In addition, the active group regained weight at 6-month follow-up, compared with sham. Genetic analysis indicated that COMT Met noncarriers were the subgroup that accounted for this paradoxical response in the active group. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in young women with class I obesity, tDCS targeted to the DLPFC does not facilitate weight loss. Indeed, we found indications that tDCS could have a paradoxical effect in this population, possibly connected with individual differences in dopamine availability. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Authors: Hedy Kober; Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Ethan F Kross; Jochen Weber; Walter Mischel; Carl L Hart; Kevin N Ochsner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sascha Heinitz; Martin Reinhardt; Paolo Piaggi; Christopher M Weise; Enrique Diaz; Emma J Stinson; Colleen Venti; Susanne B Votruba; Eric M Wassermann; Miguel Alonso-Alonso; Jonathan Krakoff; Marci E Gluck Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: D Val-Laillet; E Aarts; B Weber; M Ferrari; V Quaresima; L E Stoeckel; M Alonso-Alonso; M Audette; C H Malbert; E Stice Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Gene-Jack Wang; Nora D Volkow; Frank Telang; Millard Jayne; Yeming Ma; Kith Pradhan; Wei Zhu; Christopher T Wong; Panayotis K Thanos; Allan Geliebter; Anat Biegon; Joanna S Fowler Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Uku Vainik; Travis E Baker; Mahsa Dadar; Yashar Zeighami; Andréanne Michaud; Yu Zhang; José C García Alanis; Bratislav Misic; D Louis Collins; Alain Dagher Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 11.205