| Literature DB >> 32076087 |
Syieluing Wong1, Nawal Abd Ghafar1, Norzita Ngadi2, Fatin Amirah Razmi1, Ibrahim Mohammed Inuwa3, Ramli Mat3, Nor Aishah Saidina Amin1.
Abstract
Adsorption of Reactive Black 5 andEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32076087 PMCID: PMC7031400 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60021-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Removal percentages of (a) RB5 and (b) CR dyes by CW and PEI-CW synthesized using different impregnation ratios.
Figure 2Chemical structures of (a) RB5 and (b) CR dye molecules.
Figure 3FTIR Spectra of CW and PEI-CW.
Boehm titration result and pHpzc for PEI-CW.
| Adsorbent | Functional groups (mmol/g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | Lactonic | Phenolic | Carboxylic | Acidic | |
| PEI-CW | 2.013 | 0.300 | 0.125 | 0.0 | 0.425 |
Figure 4Determination of pHpzc for PEI-CW.
Textural properties of CW and PEI-CW.
| Property | CW | PEI-CW | Activated carbon[ |
|---|---|---|---|
| BET surface area (m3/g) | 2.115 | 4.997 | 1202.8 |
| Mesopore area (cm2/g) | 1.494 | 2.056 | 362.3 |
| Mesopore volume (cm3/g) | 0.010 | 0.022 | 0.37 |
| Micropore area (cm2/g) | 0.621 | 2.941 | 694.1 |
| Micropore volume (cm3/g) | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.72 |
Figure 5Surface morphologies of CW at (a) 300x and (b)1500x , PEI-CW at (c) 300x and (d)1500x, as well foreign particles in (e) CW and (f) PEI-CW.
Figure 6XRD diffractograms of CW and PEI-CW matched with reference peaks of cellulose structure obtained from Internal Chemical Diffraction Data (ICDD).
Figure 7Effects of (a,b) contact time, (c,d) initial dye concentration, (e,f) temperature, (g,h) solution pH and (i,j) adsorbent dosage on the RB5 (black) and CR (red) adsorption onto PEI-CW (■ refers to removal percentage; ▲ refers to adsorption capacity).
Figure 8Langmuir isotherm plots for adsorption of (a) RB5 and (b) CR dyes, as well as Freundlich isotherm plots for adsorption of (c) RB5 and (d) CR dyes.
Adsorption isotherm parameters for CR and RB5 dye adsorption onto PEI-CW.
| Dye | Langmuir | Freundlich | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qm (mg/g) | Ka (L/mg) | R2 | 1/n | Kf (mg/g) | R2 | |
| CR | 34.36 | 0.39 | 0.99 | 0.19 | 17.23 | 0.67 |
| RB5 | 77.52 | 0.75 | 0.96 | 0.54 | 32.56 | 0.93 |
Maximum adsorption capacities of various adsorbents towards RB5 and CR dyes.
| Adsorbent | Maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g) | |
|---|---|---|
| RB5 | CR | |
| Dolomite[ | 72.4 | 229.2 |
| Banana peel powder[ | 49.2 | 164.6 |
| Hierarchical magnesium oxide (MgO) incorporated fly ash (FA) composite[ | 48.8 | — |
| Zerovalent iron nanoparticles combined with | 39.9 | — |
| Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle[ | 18.0 | — |
| MoO2/CaSO4 composites[ | — | 853.5 |
| Hierarchical C/NiO-ZnO nanocomposite[ | — | 613.0 |
| Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles loaded on Zein[ | — | 416.7 |
| Amine-modified | — | 193.7 |
| Pineapple plant stem[ | — | 12.0 |
Adsorption kinetic parameters for CR and RB5 dye adsorption onto PEI-CW.
| Kinetic Model | Parameter | Dye | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CR | RB5 | ||
| PFO | k1 (min−1) | 0.03 | 0.09 |
| qe,calc (mg/g) | 18.26 | 12.98 | |
| R2 | 0.89 | 0.94 | |
| PSO | k2 (g mg−1 min−1) | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| qe,calc (mg/g) | 22.13 | 25.34 | |
| R2 | 0.98 | 1.00 | |
| Experimental qe (mg/g) | 21.94 | 24.98 | |
Figure 9Adsorption kinetic model fitting plots using (a) PFO model (for RB5 and CR dyes), (b) PSO model (for RB5 and CR dye) and intraparticle diffusion model for (c) RB5 dye and (d) CR dye.
Figure 10Van’t Hoff plot of CR and RB5 dye adsorption onto PEI-CW adsorbent.
Thermodynamic parameters for CR and RB5 dye adsorption onto PEI-CW.
| Parameter | Dye | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CR | RB5 | ||
| ΔGo (kJ/mol) | 25 °C | −3.76 | −9.66 |
| 30 °C | −4.53 | −9.96 | |
| 40 °C | −5.86 | −10.28 | |
| 50 °C | −7.46 | −11.08 | |
| 60 °C | −8.17 | −11.80 | |
| ΔHo (kJ/mol) | 35.05 | 8.28 | |
| ΔSo (J/mol K) | 130.59 | 59.99 | |