| Literature DB >> 32075501 |
Valentina Yurinskaya1, Nikolay Aksenov1, Alexey Moshkov1, Tatyana Goryachaya1, Ashley Shemery2, Alexey Vereninov1.
Abstract
Assessing the expression of channels on the cell membrane is a necessary step in studying the functioning of ion channels in living cells. We explore, first, if endogenous VRAC can be assayed using flow cytometry and a commercially available antibody against an extracellular loop of the LRRC8A, also known as SWELL1, subunit of the VRAC channel. The second goal is to determine if an increase in the number of VRAC channels at the cell membrane is responsible for an increase in chloride permeability of the membrane in two well-known cases: during staurosporine (STS)-induced apoptosis and after water balance disturbance caused by hypotonic medium. Human suspension lymphoid cells U937 were used as they are suitable for flow fluorometry and because we have recently studied their membrane chloride permeability during apoptosis. We found that surface expression of endogenous LRRC8A subunits can be quantified in living U937 cells using flow fluorometry with the Alomone Lab antibody. Further, we revealed that treatment of cells for 1 hour using STS or a hypotonic solution did not change the number of LRRC8A subunits to the extent that would correspond to changes in the membrane chloride permeability determined by ion content analysis. This indicates that prolonged increase in chloride permeability of the cell membrane during apoptotic cell shrinkage or cell volume regulation under hypotonicity in U937 cells occurs without altering cell surface expression of VRAC.Entities:
Keywords: Anion channel; LRRC8A; VRAC; antibody; flow cytometry; surface expression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32075501 PMCID: PMC7039630 DOI: 10.1080/19336950.2020.1730535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Channels (Austin) ISSN: 1933-6950 Impact factor: 2.581
Figure 1.(a)Differentiation of whole cells (subset P1) and microparticles (subset P0) in unstained U937 cultures by analysis of FSC/SSC contour diagrams. (b) FSC/ECD diagram of unstained cells revealing background autofluorescence (Af) of P1 and P0 particles in ECD channel specific for the LRRC8A-Ab, (c) Contour diagram for sample stained with primary+secondary Ab (PrAb+Sec). (aa, bb, cc) Dot plots and (ah, bh, ch) histograms of the data presented above as contour plots, since many readers prefer dot plots. A small subset Px is visible on the dot plots, the share of which is only 2.3 % and is not discussed here. (d, e) P1 and P0 subset histograms for unstained (–Abs), stained with only secondary (SecAb) and with primary+secondary Ab (PrAb+Sec). Each pair of P1 and P0 plots in Figs d, e corresponds to the same sample. (f) FSC histograms of P1 subset obtained for the same samples as histograms for LRRC8A-Ab specific channel ECD. X-axes in d-f panels have the same scale extension. Different treatments correspond to different samples but are experimentally controlled for time and cultured cell line. Representative data of one of three independent experiments are shown.
Figure 2.The distribution of cells (P1) of the same sample stained with both ANEPPS (a) and CFSE (b), determined by their fluorescence in channels PC5.5 (ANEPPS) and FITC (CFSE), and the corresponding FSC histogram (c). Representative data of one of three independent experiments are shown.
Figure 3.No effect of STS or hypotonic medium on anti-LRRC8A Ab histograms (a) in cells responding by changes in FSC (b) and SSC (c). P1 subset histograms of cells, stained with LRRC8A-Ab+secondary Ab (1) and additionally treated for 1 h with 1 µM STS (2) or with hypotonic medium (3). Each of 1–3 histograms corresponds to separate sample. The compared histograms were obtained in the same experiments. Representative data of three independent experiments are shown.