Ioannis Liampas1, Vasileios Siokas1, Alexandros Brotis2, Elias Zintzaras3,4, Ioannis Stefanidis5, Efthimios Dardiotis1. 1. Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece. 3. Department of Biomathematics, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece. 4. Center for Clinical Evidence Synthesis, the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Larissa, School of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Abstract
Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurologic emergency. The present study constitutes a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of intravenous sodium valproate (VPA) in SE. Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched, while retrieved RCTs and meta-analyses were manually screened. Prespecified outcome measures included seizure-cessation, 24 h-efficacy, constitute (liver enzyme increase, arrhythmias, bone-marrow suppression, hypotension and respiratory depression) and severe (life-threatening) adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis was performed when appropriate, using Random-Effects (RE) or Fixed-Effects (FE) model based on heterogeneity between trials (homogeneity assumed when PQ > 0.1 and I2 < 50%). Outcomes were assessed using Odds-Ratios (ORs) and 95%Confidence-Intervals (95% CIs). Every available comparison was investigated in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Results: Thirteen studies were retrieved and five comparisons were available, four of which involved two or more studies. Results were compatible with no significant difference between VPA and Phenytoin both in terms of efficacy and tolerability [seizure-cessation: FE-OR = 1.99, 95% CI = (0.83-4.75), 24 h-efficacy: FE-OR = 1.32, 95% CI = (0.60-2.89), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.45, 95% CI = (0.17-1.21)]. Phenobarbital proved more commonly associated with composite AEs than VPA [seizure-cessation: RE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.05-9.44), 24 h-efficacy: RE-OR = 0.88, 95% CI = (0.02-33.9), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.09-0.82), severe AEs: FE-OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.04-2.28)]. Diazepam was determined inferior to VPA concerning safety issues [seizure-termination: FE-OR = 0.77, 95% CI = (0.34-1.79), severe respiratory depression: FE-OR = 0.06, 95% CI = (0.01-0.48), severe hypotension: FE-OR = 0.09, 95% CI = (0.01-0.72)]. The combination of Lorazepam (LZP) with VPA and the combination of LZP with Levetiracetam presented no difference in efficacy [24h-efficacy: FE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.37-1.24)].Conclusions: Although, additional high-quality RCTs are warranted, according to our results, VPA can be considered a safe and effective option in the management of SE.
Objective: Status epilepticus (SE) is a common neurologic emergency. The present study constitutes a meta-analysis of published randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of intravenous sodium valproate (VPA) in SE. Methods: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were comprehensively searched, while retrieved RCTs and meta-analyses were manually screened. Prespecified outcome measures included seizure-cessation, 24 h-efficacy, constitute (liver enzyme increase, arrhythmias, bone-marrow suppression, hypotension and respiratory depression) and severe (life-threatening) adverse events (AEs). Evidence synthesis was performed when appropriate, using Random-Effects (RE) or Fixed-Effects (FE) model based on heterogeneity between trials (homogeneity assumed when PQ > 0.1 and I2 < 50%). Outcomes were assessed using Odds-Ratios (ORs) and 95%Confidence-Intervals (95% CIs). Every available comparison was investigated in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Results: Thirteen studies were retrieved and five comparisons were available, four of which involved two or more studies. Results were compatible with no significant difference between VPA and Phenytoin both in terms of efficacy and tolerability [seizure-cessation: FE-OR = 1.99, 95% CI = (0.83-4.75), 24 h-efficacy: FE-OR = 1.32, 95% CI = (0.60-2.89), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.45, 95% CI = (0.17-1.21)]. Phenobarbital proved more commonly associated with composite AEs than VPA [seizure-cessation: RE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.05-9.44), 24 h-efficacy: RE-OR = 0.88, 95% CI = (0.02-33.9), composite AEs: FE-OR = 0.26, 95% CI = (0.09-0.82), severe AEs: FE-OR = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.04-2.28)]. Diazepam was determined inferior to VPA concerning safety issues [seizure-termination: FE-OR = 0.77, 95% CI = (0.34-1.79), severe respiratory depression: FE-OR = 0.06, 95% CI = (0.01-0.48), severe hypotension: FE-OR = 0.09, 95% CI = (0.01-0.72)]. The combination of Lorazepam (LZP) with VPA and the combination of LZP with Levetiracetam presented no difference in efficacy [24h-efficacy: FE-OR = 0.68, 95% CI = (0.37-1.24)].Conclusions: Although, additional high-quality RCTs are warranted, according to our results, VPA can be considered a safe and effective option in the management of SE.