Literature DB >> 32075173

Geographical Disparities in Screening and Cancer-Related Health Behaviour.

Belinda C Goodwin1,2, Arlen K Rowe2,3, Fiona Crawford-Williams2, Peter Baade1,4,5, Suzanne K Chambers2,4,6,7, Nicholas Ralph1,2,6,8, Joanne F Aitken1,2,9.   

Abstract

This study aimed to identify whether cancer-related health behaviours including participation in cancer screening vary by geographic location in Australia. Data were obtained from the 2014-2015 Australian National Health Survey, a computer-assisted telephone interview that measured a range of health-related issues in a sample of randomly selected households. Chi-square tests and adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression models were computed to assess the association between residential location and cancer-related health behaviours including cancer screening participation, alcohol consumption, smoking, exercise, and fruit and vegetable intake, controlling for age, socio-economic status (SES), education, and place of birth. The findings show insufficient exercise, risky alcohol intake, meeting vegetable intake guidelines, and participation in cervical screening are more likely for those living in inner regional areas and in outer regional/remote areas compared with those living in major cities. Daily smoking and participation in prostate cancer screening were significantly higher for those living in outer regional/remote areas. While participation in cancer screening in Australia does not appear to be negatively impacted by regional or remote living, lifestyle behaviours associated with cancer incidence and mortality are poorer in regional and remote areas. Population-based interventions targeting health behaviour change may be an appropriate target for reducing geographical disparities in cancer outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alcohol; cancer; cancer screening; diet exercise; geographical disparity; health behavior; public health; regional; remote; smoking

Year:  2020        PMID: 32075173     DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  2 in total

1.  Income Disparities in Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2019.

Authors:  Vasuki Rajaguru; Tae Hyun Kim; Jaeyong Shin; Sang Gyu Lee
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-17

2.  What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?

Authors:  Louisa Flander; Evelien Dekker; Berit Andersen; Mette Bach Larsen; Robert J Steele; Nea Malila; Tytti Sarkeala; Manon van der Vlugt; Clasine de Klerk; Bart Knottnerus; Lucinda Bertels; Anke Woudstra; Manon C W Spaander; Mirjam Fransen; Sirpa Heinavaara; Mary Dillon; Driss Ait Ouakrim; Mark Jenkins
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.