Literature DB >> 32075048

Comparative Assessment of Phytochemical Profiles of Comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) Root Extracts Obtained by Different Extraction Techniques.

Nataša Nastić1, Isabel Borrás-Linares2, Jesús Lozano-Sánchez2,3, Jaroslava Švarc-Gajić1, Antonio Segura-Carretero2,4.   

Abstract

In this work a comparative study on phytochemical profiles of comfrey root extracts obtained by different extraction approaches has been carried out. Chemical profiles of extracts obtained by supercritical fluid (SFE), pressurized liquid (PLE), and conventional solid/liquid extraction were compared and discussed. Phytochemical composition was assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS) identifying 39 compounds reported for the first time in comfrey root, mainly phenolic acids and fatty acids. The influence of different extraction parameters on phytochemical profiles of S. officinale root was investigated for all applied techniques. PLE and maceration, using alcohol-based solvents (aqueous methanol or ethanol), were shown to be more efficient in the recovery of more polar compounds. Greater numbers of phenolics were best extracted by PLE using 85% EtOH at 63 °C. The use of SFE and 100% acetone for 30 min enabled good recoveries of nonpolar compounds. SFE using 15% EtOH as a cosolvent at 150 bar produced the best recoveries of a significant number of fatty acids. The main compositional differences between extracts obtained by different extraction techniques were assigned to the solvent type. Hence, these results provided comprehensive approaches for treating comfrey root enriched in different phytochemicals, thereby enhancing its bioaccessibility.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS; PLE; SFE; comfrey (Symphytum officinale L.) root; maceration; phytochemical compounds

Year:  2020        PMID: 32075048     DOI: 10.3390/molecules25040837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


  3 in total

1.  Nanoencapsulation of n-butanol extract of Symphytum kurdicum and Symphytum asperrimum: Focus on phytochemical analysis, anti-oxidant and antibacterial activity.

Authors:  Elaheh Mahmoudzadeh; Hossein Nazemiyeh; Hadi Valizadeh; Farnaz Khaleseh; Samin Mohammadi; Sanaz Hamedeyazdan
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.532

2.  LC-ESI-FT-MSn Metabolite Profiling of Symphytum officinale L. Roots Leads to Isolation of Comfreyn A, an Unusual Arylnaphthalene Lignan.

Authors:  Gilda D'Urso; Milena Masullo; Jacqueline Seigner; Yvonne M Holper-Schichl; Rainer de Martin; Alberto Plaza; Sonia Piacente
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  UPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap MS Analysis for Identification of Lipophilic Components in Citri Sarcodactylis Fructus from Different Origins in China Using Supercritical CO2 Fluid Extraction Method.

Authors:  Chengxiao Fu; Mengshi Liu; Yueshan Li; Kanghui Wang; Bo Yang; Lijing Deng; Jingyuan Tian; Guoping Yang; Guodong Zheng
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.