| Literature DB >> 32074977 |
Klára Daďová1, Miroslav Petr1, Michal Šteffl1, Lenka Sontáková1, Martin Chlumský1, Miloš Matouš2, Vladimír Štich2,3, Marek Štěpán2,3, Michaela Šiklová2.
Abstract
We investigated changes in functional fitness after an exercise program in combination with Calanus oil supplementation, a novel source of bioactive lipids rich in wax esters with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA). Fifty-five healthy sedentary women aged 65-80 (mean age 70.9 ± 3.9 years, BMI 27.24 ± 3.9 kg m-2, VO2peak 19.46 ± 3.7 ml kg-1 min-1) were enrolled in the study. The participants were divided into two groups: exercise training plus Calanus Oil supplementation (n = 28) or exercise plus placebo (sunflower oil) supplementation (n = 27). The exercise intervention program was completed by 53 participants and contained functional circuit training (twice a week, 45 min plus 15 min of stretching and balance training) and Nordic walking (once a week, 60 min) for 16 weeks. Senior fitness test, exercise stress test on bicycle ergometer, hand-grip, and body composition were evaluated before and after the program. Our results show that functional fitness and body composition improved following the interventional exercise program, but for most of the parameters there was no synergic effect of supplementing n-3 PUFA-rich Calanus oil. In comparison to the placebo group, the group with Calanus supplementation experienced significantly higher improvement of functional strength of lower body which was evaluated by the chair stand test. Supplementation with Calanus may have a synergic effect with exercise on functional strength of the lower body in the elderly.Entities:
Keywords: calanus oil; circuit training; nordic walking; older age
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32074977 PMCID: PMC7071248 DOI: 10.3390/nu12020481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Descriptive statistics (baseline values).
| Calanus | Placebo | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 71.0 (4.0) | 71.0 (5.3) | 0.879 |
| Height (cm) | 161.0 (9.0) | 161.0 (9.5) | 0.943 |
| Weight (kg) | 69.9 (9.3) | 68.5 (19.3) | 0.575 |
| BMI (kg.m−2) | 26.8 (4.9) | 26.5 (5.9) | 0.735 |
Note: data are presented as median (IQR); Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for differences; BMI—body mass index.
Comparison of physical performance within groups and between groups.
| Values a | Absolute Changes b | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calanus | Placebo | Calanus | Placebo | ||||
| ( | ( | ( | ( |
| |||
| Parameters | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Post-Pre | Post-Pre | |
| Chair Stand (repetitions) | 16.0 (6.0) | 20.0 (5.0) * | 16.0 (5.0) | 18.5 (5.0) * | 4.0 (5.0) | 3.0 (3.0) * | 0.316 |
| Arm Curl (repetitions) | 20.0 (8.0) | 26.0 (6.0) * | 19.0 (6.3) | 21.5 (6.3) * | 6.0 (5.0) | 3.0 (6.3) | 0.255 |
| Sit and Reach (cm) | 12.0 (14.0) | 13.0 (10.0) | 11.5 (11.0) | 12.0 (8.9) | 2.0 (8.0) | 1.0 (6.1) | 0.105 |
| Back Scratch (cm) | −2.0 (11.0) | −1.5 (13.0) | 1.8 (10.1) | 4.3 (9.3) * | 1.0 (3.0) | 1.5 (3.4) | 0.176 |
| Hand Grip (kg) | 26.2 (4.7) | 25.2 (4.3) | 26.4 (5.5) | 27.1 (6.2) * | 1.0 (2.0) | 0.9 (2.3) | 0.054 |
| Peak power output (W. kg−1) | 1.6 (0.5) | 1.7 (0.4) * | 1.6 (0.5) | 1.7 (0.3) * | 0.1 (0.2) | 0.2 (0.2) | −0.218 |
| VO2peak (ml.kg−1.min−1) | 18.8 (4.7) | 21.2 (7.7) * | 18.4 (5.3) | 22.6 (5.2) * | 2.4 (5.0) | 3.4 (5.0) | −0.072 |
Note: data are presented as median (IQR), * p < 0.05, a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, b Mann–Whitney U test; r = effect size; minus prefers placebo; VO2peak—oxygen uptake during peak exercise.
Comparison of body composition within groups and between groups.
| Values a | Absolute Changes b | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calanus | Placebo | Calanus | Placebo | ||||
| ( | ( | ( | ( |
| |||
| Parameters | Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Post-Pre | Post-Pre | |
| Weight (kg) | 69.9 (9.3) | 68.7 (8.1) | 68.5 (19.3) | 67.4 (18.7) * | −0.1 (1.9) | −1.1 (1.5) | −0.208 |
| ICW (l) | 19.9 (2.5) | 20.0 (3.2) | 20.1 (4.1) | 20.0 (4.2) | 0.0 (1.1) | 0.1 (2.9) | 0.038 |
| ECW (l) | 12.7 (1.7) | 12.8 (1.9) | 12.6 (2.4) | 13.0 (2.5) | 0.0 (0.5) | −0.1 (2.0) | 0.062 |
| Fat (kg) | 26.5 (10.8) | 24.5 (9.9) | 23.3 (8.7) | 22.0 (8.3) | −1.1 (3.1) | −0.7 (9.6) | 0.007 |
| Fat (%) | 37.2 (7.7) | 35.2 (7.8) | 34.5 (10.0) | 33.9 (8.4) | −0.8 (3.3) | −1.0 (8.0) | 0.040 |
| SMM (kg) | 23.9 (3.2) | 24.1 (4.1) | 24.1 (5.3) | 24.1 (5.5) | 0.1 (1.3) | 0.1 (3.4) | 0.057 |
| VFA (cm2) | 114.8 (46.0) | 98.2 (33.8) * | 101.0 (43.0) | 92.3 (45.5) | −13.6 (29.3) | −12.7 (27.4) | 0.109 |
| BMI (kg.m−2) | 26.8 (4.9) | 26.8 (4.4) | 26.5 (5.9) | 26.0 (5.7) * | 0.0 (0.7) | −0.4 (0.7) | −0.197 |
Note: data are presented as median (IQR), * p < 0.05, a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, b Mann–Whitney U test; r = effect size; minus prefers placebo; ICW—intracellular water; ECW—extracellular water; SMM—skeletal muscle mass; VFA - visceral fat area; BMI—body mass index.