OBJECTIVES: Different anesthesia techniques are used for surgical implantation of paddle lead electrodes for neurostimulation through a laminectomy. We wanted to evaluate the use of dexmedetomidine as sedative for this procedure in a series of patients. Second, we wanted to verify whether the stimulation pattern and position of the electrode had to be changed during the procedure guided by the patient's feedback. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients received surgical implantation of a spinal cord stimulation electrode under conscious sedation using dexmedetomidine and local anesthesia. We evaluated the effects of the administered drug, the patient comfort, and the adequacy of the stimulation pattern. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients completed the procedure with only dexmedetomidine and local anesthetic. Infusion was started on average 55 minutes (sd 29) prior to incision. The mean dose of lidocaine was 430 mg (sd 95). There were no significant hemodynamic changes. Median time to reach Modified Aldrete's score postoperative was 67 minutes (sd 38). In 46% of the patients, the position of the electrode was changed guided by the feedback of the patient. More than half of the patients remember most details of the procedure. Only four patients mentioned substantial discomfort and only three would definitely not want to undergo this procedure again. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of spinal cord stimulation electrodes through a surgical laminectomy using dexmedetomidine is a safe and feasible procedure with adequate comfort for patient and surgeon. This way of working increases the optimal position of the electrode resulting in the most convenient stimulation pattern and avoiding revisions.
OBJECTIVES: Different anesthesia techniques are used for surgical implantation of paddle lead electrodes for neurostimulation through a laminectomy. We wanted to evaluate the use of dexmedetomidine as sedative for this procedure in a series of patients. Second, we wanted to verify whether the stimulation pattern and position of the electrode had to be changed during the procedure guided by the patient's feedback. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients received surgical implantation of a spinal cord stimulation electrode under conscious sedation using dexmedetomidine and local anesthesia. We evaluated the effects of the administered drug, the patient comfort, and the adequacy of the stimulation pattern. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients completed the procedure with only dexmedetomidine and local anesthetic. Infusion was started on average 55 minutes (sd 29) prior to incision. The mean dose of lidocaine was 430 mg (sd 95). There were no significant hemodynamic changes. Median time to reach Modified Aldrete's score postoperative was 67 minutes (sd 38). In 46% of the patients, the position of the electrode was changed guided by the feedback of the patient. More than half of the patients remember most details of the procedure. Only four patients mentioned substantial discomfort and only three would definitely not want to undergo this procedure again. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of spinal cord stimulation electrodes through a surgical laminectomy using dexmedetomidine is a safe and feasible procedure with adequate comfort for patient and surgeon. This way of working increases the optimal position of the electrode resulting in the most convenient stimulation pattern and avoiding revisions.