Literature DB >> 32073942

Meta-analysis of biological variables' impact on spinal motoneuron electrophysiology data.

Morgan M Highlander1, John M Allen2, Sherif M Elbasiouny2,1.   

Abstract

Experimental, methodological, and biological variables must be accounted for statistically to maximize accuracy and comparability of published neuroscience data. However, accounting for all variables is nigh impossible. Thus we aimed to identify particularly influential variables within published neurological data, from cat, rat, and mouse studies, via a robust statistical process. Our goal was to develop tools to improve rigor in the collection and analysis of data. We strictly constrained experimental and methodological variables and then assessed four key biological variables within motoneuron research: species, age, sex, and cell type. We quantified intraexperimental and interexperimental variances in 11 commonly reported electrophysiological properties of spinal motoneurons. We first assessed variances without accounting for biological variables and then reassessed them while accounting for all four variables. We next assessed variances with all possible combinations of these four variables. We concluded that some motoneuron properties have low intraexperimental, but high interexperimental, variance; that individual motoneuron properties are impacted differently by biological variables; and that some unexplained variances still remain. We report here the optimal combinations of biological variables to reduce interexperimental variance for all 11 parameters. We also rank each parameter by intra- and interexperimental consistency. We expect these results to assist with design of experimental and analytical methods, and to support accuracy in simulations. Furthermore, although demonstrated on spinal motoneuron electrophysiology literature, our approach is applicable to biological data from all fields of neuroscience. This approach represents an important aid to experimental design, comparison of reported data, and reduction of unexplained variance in neuroscience data.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our meta-analysis shows the impact of species, age, sex, and cell type on lumbosacral motoneuron electrophysiological properties by thoroughly quantifying variances across literature for the first time. We quantify the variances of 11 motoneuron properties with consideration of biological variables, thus providing specific insights for motoneuron modelers and experimenters, and providing a general methodological template for the quantification of variance in neurological data with the consideration of any experimental, methodological, or biological variables of interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological variables; electrophysiology; excitability; motoneuron; variance

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32073942      PMCID: PMC7191523          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00378.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  111 in total

1.  Analysis of Ia-inhibitory synaptic input to cat spinal motoneurons evoked by vibration of antagonist muscles.

Authors:  C J Heckman; M D Binder
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Crossed rhythmic synaptic input to motoneurons during selective activation of the contralateral spinal locomotor network.

Authors:  O Kjaerulff; O Kiehn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Removal of supraspinal input reveals a difference in the flexor and extensor monosynaptic reflex response to quipazine independent of motoneuron excitation.

Authors:  Jeremy W Chopek; Christopher W MacDonell; Kevin E Power; Kalan Gardiner; Phillip F Gardiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Electrical properties of motoneurons in the spinal cord of rat embryos.

Authors:  L Ziskind-Conhaim
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  The effects of tetrodotoxin-induced muscle paralysis on the physiological properties of muscle units and their innervating motoneurons in rat.

Authors:  P F Gardiner; K L Seburn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Modulation of motoneuron excitability by brain-derived neurotrophic factor.

Authors:  M Gonzalez; W F Collins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Input conductance axonal conduction velocity and cell size among hindlimb motoneurones of the cat.

Authors:  D Kernell; B Zwaagstra
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-01-12       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Training improves the electrophysiological properties of lumbar neurons and locomotion after thoracic spinal cord injury in rats.

Authors:  Eric Beaumont; Sevan Kaloustian; Guy Rousseau; Bruno Cormery
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 3.304

9.  Electrophysiological properties of neonatal rat motoneurones studied in vitro.

Authors:  B P Fulton; K Walton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Multiple types of tachykinin receptor mediate a slow excitation of rat spinal motoneurones in vitro.

Authors:  N D Fisher; G Baranauskas; A Nistri
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1994-01-03       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  3 in total

1.  In vitro longitudinal lumbar spinal cord preparations to study sensory and recurrent motor microcircuits of juvenile mice.

Authors:  Mustafa Görkem Özyurt; Julia Ojeda-Alonso; Marco Beato; Filipe Nascimento
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Estimation of the firing behaviour of a complete motoneuron pool by combining electromyography signal decomposition and realistic motoneuron modelling.

Authors:  Arnault H Caillet; Andrew T M Phillips; Dario Farina; Luca Modenese
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  Estimating the effects of slicing on the electrophysiological properties of spinal motoneurons under normal and disease conditions.

Authors:  Mohamed H Mousa; Sherif M Elbasiouny
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.