Literature DB >> 32073476

Influence of Patient Demographics and Surgical Characteristics on Pass Rates of Return-to-Activity Tests in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Patients Before Physician Clearance.

Grant E Norte1, John W Goetschius2, Lindsay V Slater3, Joseph M Hart4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the frequency of passing return-to-activity tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to investigate the influence of patient-specific factors on pass rates. We hypothesized that isolated strength tests would be most difficult to pass and that graft type would be the most influential factor.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty patients with a history of primary, unilateral ACLR, and 80 healthy controls participated.
INTERVENTIONS: Bilateral isokinetic strength, isometric strength, and single-leg hop tests were recorded during a single visit. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation measured subjective knee function, and the Tegner Activity Scale measured physical activity level. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pass rates were calculated for 3 thresholds of absolute between-limb asymmetry: 0% to 10%, 11% to 15%, and 16% to 20%. Pass rates were compared by sex (male and female), graft type (patellar and hamstrings), meniscal procedure (yes and no), physical activity level (</≥ median Tegner), and time from surgery (</≥ 6 months).
RESULTS: Isokinetic quadriceps strength was consistently most difficult to pass, whereas the 6-meter timed hop and crossover hop tests were easiest. Graft type had the greatest influence on pass rates (isometric quadriceps and hamstring strength, hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio), followed by time from surgery (6-meter timed hop and crossover hop), physical activity (IKDC), and meniscal procedure (6-meter timed hop).
CONCLUSIONS: Isokinetic quadriceps strength was the most difficult test to pass, and single-leg hop tests were the easiest. Patient-specific factors including graft type, time from surgery, physical activity level, and meniscal procedure may influence the ability to meet return-to-activity criterion after ACLR.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32073476     DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Sport Med        ISSN: 1050-642X            Impact factor:   3.638


  4 in total

1.  Rationale for a Parsimonious Measure of Subjective Knee Function Among Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy Duckett; Christine M Fox; Joseph M Hart; Grant E Norte
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Test Batteries After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chelsey Roe; Cale Jacobs; Johanna Hoch; Darren L Johnson; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Quadriceps Strength Influences Patient Function More Than Single Leg Forward Hop During Late-Stage ACL Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Meredith Chaput; Marcus Palimenio; Brooke Farmer; Dimitrios Katsavelis; Jennifer J Bagwell; Kimberly A Turman; Chris Wichman; Terry L Grindstaff
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Muscle activity in asymmetric bench press among resistance-trained individuals.

Authors:  Atle Hole Saeterbakken; Tom Erik J Solstad; David G Behm; Nicolay Stien; Matthew Peter Shaw; Helene Pedersen; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.