Literature DB >> 32072687

A multicenter retrospective study of 223 patients with t(14;16) in multiple myeloma.

Sarah Goldman-Mazur1, Artur Jurczyszyn1, Jorge J Castillo2, Anna Waszczuk-Gajda3, Norbert Grząśko4,5, Jakub Radocha6, Max Bittrich7, K Martin Kortüm7, Alessandro Gozzetti8, Lidia Usnarska-Zubkiewicz9, Julio Davila Valls10, David S Jayabalan11, Ruben Niesvizky11, Julia Kelman11, Daniel Coriu12, Laura Rosiñol13, Łukasz Szukalski14, Veronica González-Calle15, Maria V Mateos15, Krzysztof Jamroziak16, Iwona Hus4,16, Irit Avivi17,18, Yael Cohen17,18, Anna Suska1, Aimee Chappell19, Deepu Madduri20, Saurabh Chhabra21, Ariel Kleman21, Parameswaran Hari21, Michel Delforge22, Paweł Robak23, Massimo Gentile24, Izabela Kozłowska25, Stuart L Goldberg26,27, Jacek Czepiel28, Rebecca Silbermann29, Adam J Olszewski30, Peter Barth30, Gabor Mikala31, Chor S Chim32, Monika Długosz-Danecka33, Sebastian Grosicki34, David H Vesole26.   

Abstract

The t(14;16) translocation, found in 3%-5% of newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM), has been associated with adverse outcomes. However, the studies establishing the characteristics of t(14;16) included solely small cohorts. The goal of the current international, multicenter (n = 25 centers), retrospective study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of t(14;16) patients in a large, real-world cohort (n = 223). A substantial fraction of patients had renal impairment (24%) and hemoglobin <10 g/dL (56%) on initial presentation. Combined therapy of both immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitor (PI) in the first line was used in 35% of patients. Autologous stem cell transplantation was performed in 42% of patients. With a median follow up of 4.1 years (95% CI 3.7-18.7), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from first line therapy were 2.1 years (95% CI 1.5-2.4) and 4.1 years (95% CI 3.3-5.5), respectively. Worse OS was predicted by age > 60 years (HR = 1.65, 95% CI [1.05-2.58]), as well as revised International Scoring System (R-ISS) 3 (vs R-ISS 2; HR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.59-4.24]). In conclusion, based on the largest reported cohort of t(14;16) patients, quarter of this subset of MM patients initially presents with renal failure, while older age and the R-ISS 3 predict poor survival.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32072687     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pathogenesis and treatment of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Peipei Yang; Ying Qu; Mengyao Wang; Bingyang Chu; Wen Chen; Yuhuan Zheng; Ting Niu; Zhiyong Qian
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-06-02

Review 2.  Risk factors in multiple myeloma: is it time for a revision?

Authors:  Jill Corre; Nikhil C Munshi; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 25.476

Review 3.  Drug resistance and minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Alessandro Gozzetti; Sara Ciofini; Anna Sicuranza; Paola Pacelli; Donatella Raspadori; Emanuele Cencini; Dania Tocci; Monica Bocchia
Journal:  Cancer Drug Resist       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 4.  Multiple Myeloma: Heterogeneous in Every Way.

Authors:  Anaïs Schavgoulidze; Titouan Cazaubiel; Aurore Perrot; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Jill Corre
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.