| Literature DB >> 32072595 |
Greg Ball1, Raffael Kurek2, Barbara A Hendrickson3, James Buchanan4, William W Wang5, Susan P Duke6, Amit Bhattacharyya7, Mengchun Li8, Dennis O'Brien9, Judith Weigel10, Wenquan Wang11, Qi Jiang12, Faiz Ahmad13, Jonathan H Seltzer14, Esteban Herrero-Martinez15, Lothar Tremmel16.
Abstract
Notwithstanding successful harmonization efforts, the global regulatory framework governing product safety is complex and continually evolving, as evidenced by additional regional guidance and regulations. In this regulatory review, we provide an overview from both global and regional perspectives. A historical perspective, with a focus on recent developments, enables identification of important long-term trends, such as a shift from single-case medical review of serious adverse events to an interdisciplinary evaluation of aggregate data for the purpose of judging product causality and informing benefit-risk assessments. We will show how these trends lead to opportunities for closer interdisciplinary collaboration, for bridging the gap between preand postmarketing surveillance, and for a more proactive determination of patient populations with a positive benefit-risk profile for product use. We will conclude by pointing to ongoing and future work that seeks to provide specific solutions for ongoing aggregate safety evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: RSI; SUSAR; aggregate safety assessment; interdisciplinary safety evaluation; medical judgment
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32072595 PMCID: PMC7222952 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-019-00076-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Innov Regul Sci ISSN: 2168-4790 Impact factor: 1.778