Literature DB >> 32072580

Building a Better Approach for the Benefit of Patients: 10 Pillars to Strengthen Regulatory Review Systems Globally.

Julie O'Brien1, Rebecca Sarah Lumsden2, Dellarika Hedwig Diehl3, Judith Catherine Macdonald4.   

Abstract

In the current pharmaceutical regulatory environment, patients continue to benefit from great advances in medical care. Sophisticated regulatory review systems have also evolved to ensure that safe and effective medicines are approved. However, these systems are not optimized in all countries. Gaps in individual regulatory agency capabilities together with duplication in non-value added national regulatory requirements, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), can slow down regulatory approvals and therefore impede patient access to new medicines. These gaps exist despite the achievements in both regulatory convergence and harmonization of technical requirements by bodies such as the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH). There is a pressing need to strengthen regulatory review systems in emerging market economies as highlighted by the World Health Organization (WHO). These diverse challenges may seem overwhelming to individual national regulators, in part because of the sheer number of initiatives by multiple stakeholders, combined with a lack of information on concise practical actionable measures that can have a positive impact on review efficiency. This commentary presents 10 pillars that we believe represent the key hallmarks of strong regulatory review systems. Leveraging our internal company expertise at the global, regional, and country level across our entire product portfolio (both innovative and generic), we selected features proven to work in leading regulatory agencies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which are also relevant for other regulatory authorities, especially in LMICs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LMIC; RSS; regulatory; reliance; strengthening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32072580     DOI: 10.1007/s43441-019-00055-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  1 in total

1.  What can vaccines learn from aviation?

Authors:  Thierry Gastineau
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.641

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.