Monika Kornacka1,2, Kamila Czepczor-Bernat3, Piotr Napieralski4, Anna Brytek-Matera3. 1. Institute of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, ul. Chodakowska 18/31, 03-815, Warsaw, Poland. mkornacka@swps.edu.pl. 2. PSITEC EA 4072, University of Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France. mkornacka@swps.edu.pl. 3. Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, Wroclaw, Poland. 4. Institute of Information Technology, Lodz University of Technology, Lodz, Poland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The literature suggests that rumination (i.e., repetitive thinking about 1 or more negative concerns that is perceived as difficult to control) is linked to impaired emotional regulation and increases negative affect. Not only individuals suffering from overweight or obesity, but also healthy individuals might use emotional eating as a coping strategy to deal with negative affect caused by rumination. The aim of the present study was to determine the link between rumination and maladaptive eating strategies in participants with normal weight and overweight/obesity using trait and ecological momentary measures. METHOD: In Study 1, 88 individuals from overweight/obese (N = 33) and control group (N = 50) filled in a series of questionnaires assessing trait rumination, and eating behaviors. In Study 2 momentary affect, rumination and eating behavior of 26 participants were assessed using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodology. RESULTS: In Study 1, the moderated mediation model revealed that emotional eating mediates the link between rumination and uncontrolled eating or snacking, but only in healthy participants and not in the participants with overweight. The results of Study 2 suggest that when both momentary rumination and sad mood are entered into the model predicting momentary daily emotional eating, only rumination remains a significant predictor of emotional eating. This relationship is not modified by the fact that the participants are from healthy controls or the overweight/obese group. DISCUSSION: Study 1 provided evidence on the differential role of emotional eating in participants with normal weight and with overweight. Study 2 provided initial insights into the role of momentary mood and momentary repetitive thinking in the use of emotional eating in participants' everyday lives. The differences in group effect in trait and EMA measures indicated also the importance of considering the consciousness of using rumination and emotional eating, while studying those processes in individuals with overweight. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control analytic study.
PURPOSE: The literature suggests that rumination (i.e., repetitive thinking about 1 or more negative concerns that is perceived as difficult to control) is linked to impaired emotional regulation and increases negative affect. Not only individuals suffering from overweight or obesity, but also healthy individuals might use emotional eating as a coping strategy to deal with negative affect caused by rumination. The aim of the present study was to determine the link between rumination and maladaptive eating strategies in participants with normal weight and overweight/obesity using trait and ecological momentary measures. METHOD: In Study 1, 88 individuals from overweight/obese (N = 33) and control group (N = 50) filled in a series of questionnaires assessing trait rumination, and eating behaviors. In Study 2 momentary affect, rumination and eating behavior of 26 participants were assessed using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) methodology. RESULTS: In Study 1, the moderated mediation model revealed that emotional eating mediates the link between rumination and uncontrolled eating or snacking, but only in healthy participants and not in the participants with overweight. The results of Study 2 suggest that when both momentary rumination and sad mood are entered into the model predicting momentary daily emotional eating, only rumination remains a significant predictor of emotional eating. This relationship is not modified by the fact that the participants are from healthy controls or the overweight/obese group. DISCUSSION: Study 1 provided evidence on the differential role of emotional eating in participants with normal weight and with overweight. Study 2 provided initial insights into the role of momentary mood and momentary repetitive thinking in the use of emotional eating in participants' everyday lives. The differences in group effect in trait and EMA measures indicated also the importance of considering the consciousness of using rumination and emotional eating, while studying those processes in individuals with overweight. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control analytic study.
Authors: T van Strien; A Cebolla; E Etchemendy; J Gutiérrez-Maldonado; M Ferrer-García; C Botella; R Baños Journal: Appetite Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Kelly C Berg; Ross D Crosby; Li Cao; Scott J Crow; Scott G Engel; Stephen A Wonderlich; Carol B Peterson Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 4.861