Literature DB >> 3207170

Cranial base and jaw relationship.

W J Kerr1, C P Adams.   

Abstract

The lateral skull radiographs of 124 boys aged approximately 10 years divided equally between the four angle classes were digitized in an effort to establish the relationship between cranial base size and shape and jaw relationship. Comparison of the means for occlusal groups showed a trend from class II to class III as cranial base dimensions and angle decreased. The condyle was also more distally positioned with respect to nasion, point A and the Pterygomaxillary vertical in the class II groups. Cranial base length correlated strongly with maxillary length but weakly with mandibular length. Nevertheless, the size of the maxilla did not influence its prognathism. The cranial base angle was strongly correlated (-0.7) with angle sella-nasion-point B. It is concluded that cranial base size and shape influence mandibular prognathism by determining the anteroposterior position of the condyle relative to the facial profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3207170     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330770209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  12 in total

1.  A computerized tomography study of the morphological interrelationship between the temporal bones and the craniofacial complex.

Authors:  Helder Nunes Costa; Rudolf Slavicek; Sadao Sato
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Time and pattern of the fusion of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis in patients with skeletal Class I and Class III malocclusion.

Authors:  Jae-Hee Yang; Bong-Kuen Cha; Dong-Soon Choi; Jae Hyun Park; Insan Jang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial variation, ontogeny and modularity in a cross-sectional sample of modern humans.

Authors:  H L L Wellens; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; D J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  The relationship between the cranial base and jaw base in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Alice Chin; Suzanne Perry; Chongshan Liao; Yanqi Yang
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Evaluation of relationship between cranial base angle and maxillofacial morphology in Indian population: A cephalometric study.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Amarjitsingh Bhatia; Dolly Patel; Nishit Mehta; Harshik Parekh; Rahul Trivedi
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-07

Review 6.  Influence of the cranial base flexion on Class I, II and III malocclusions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kélei Cristina Mathias de Almeida; Taísa Boamorte Raveli; Camila Ivini Viana Vieira; Ary Dos Santos-Pinto; Dirceu Barnabé Raveli
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

Review 7.  Craniofacial and oral alterations in patients with Neurofibromatosis 1.

Authors:  Vivian Visnapuu; Sirkku Peltonen; Lotta Alivuotila; Risto-Pekka Happonen; Juha Peltonen
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.123

8.  Relationship between cephalometric cranial base and anterior-posterior features in an Iranian population.

Authors:  Mohammad Monirifard; Saeid Sadeghian; Zahra Afshari; Elahe Rafiei; Asana Vali Sichani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-01-21

9.  Sella size and jaw bases - Is there a correlation???

Authors:  Subraya Mogra; Vorvady Surendra Shetty; Siddarth Shetty
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

10.  Comparative Assessment of Cephalometric and Tympanometric Readings in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Sunali Khanna; Prita A Dhaimade; Rangasayee Raghunathrao
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.