Literature DB >> 32071208

Natural variation in DNA methylation homeostasis and the emergence of epialleles.

Yinwen Zhang1, Jered M Wendte2, Lexiang Ji1, Robert J Schmitz3.   

Abstract

In plants and mammals, DNA methylation plays a critical role in transcriptional silencing by delineating heterochromatin from transcriptionally active euchromatin. A homeostatic balance between heterochromatin and euchromatin is essential to genomic stability. This is evident in many diseases and mutants for heterochromatin maintenance, which are characterized by global losses of DNA methylation coupled with localized ectopic gains of DNA methylation that alter transcription. Furthermore, we have shown that genome-wide methylation patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana are highly stable over generations, with the exception of rare epialleles. However, the extent to which natural variation in the robustness of targeting DNA methylation to heterochromatin exists, and the phenotypic consequences of such variation, remain to be fully explored. Here we describe the finding that heterochromatin and genic DNA methylation are highly variable among 725 A. thaliana accessions. We found that genic DNA methylation is inversely correlated with that in heterochromatin, suggesting that certain methylation pathway(s) may be redirected to genes upon the loss of heterochromatin. This redistribution likely involves a feedback loop involving the DNA methyltransferase, CHROMOMETHYLASE 3 (CMT3), H3K9me2, and histone turnover, as highly expressed, long genes with a high density of CMT3-preferred CWG sites are more likely to be methylated. Importantly, although the presence of CG methylation in genes alone may not affect transcription, genes containing CG methylation are more likely to become methylated at non-CG sites and silenced. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that natural variation in DNA methylation homeostasis may underlie the evolution of epialleles that alter phenotypes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA methylation; epiallele; epigenetics; gene body DNA methylation; heterochromatin

Year:  2020        PMID: 32071208      PMCID: PMC7060739          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1918172117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  96 in total

Review 1.  Heterochromatin and gene regulation in Drosophila.

Authors:  S C Elgin
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  What triggers differential DNA methylation of genes and TEs: contribution of body methylation?

Authors:  S Inagaki; T Kakutani
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2013-01-09

Review 3.  Specifications of Targeting Heterochromatin Modifications in Plants.

Authors:  Jered M Wendte; Robert J Schmitz
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 13.164

4.  Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie and Ballgown.

Authors:  Mihaela Pertea; Daehwan Kim; Geo M Pertea; Jeffrey T Leek; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation.

Authors:  Matthew D Schultz; Yupeng He; John W Whitaker; Manoj Hariharan; Eran A Mukamel; Danny Leung; Nisha Rajagopal; Joseph R Nery; Mark A Urich; Huaming Chen; Shin Lin; Yiing Lin; Inkyung Jung; Anthony D Schmitt; Siddarth Selvaraj; Bing Ren; Terrence J Sejnowski; Wei Wang; Joseph R Ecker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Genome-wide negative feedback drives transgenerational DNA methylation dynamics in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Tasuku Ito; Yoshiaki Tarutani; Taiko Kim To; Mohamed Kassam; Evelyne Duvernois-Berthet; Sandra Cortijo; Kazuya Takashima; Hidetoshi Saze; Atsushi Toyoda; Asao Fujiyama; Vincent Colot; Tetsuji Kakutani
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Xiangchao Gan; Oliver Stegle; Jonas Behr; Joshua G Steffen; Philipp Drewe; Katie L Hildebrand; Rune Lyngsoe; Sebastian J Schultheiss; Edward J Osborne; Vipin T Sreedharan; André Kahles; Regina Bohnert; Géraldine Jean; Paul Derwent; Paul Kersey; Eric J Belfield; Nicholas P Harberd; Eric Kemen; Christopher Toomajian; Paula X Kover; Richard M Clark; Gunnar Rätsch; Richard Mott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Epimutations are associated with CHROMOMETHYLASE 3-induced de novo DNA methylation.

Authors:  Jered M Wendte; Yinwen Zhang; Lexiang Ji; Xiuling Shi; Rashmi R Hazarika; Yadollah Shahryary; Frank Johannes; Robert J Schmitz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  An Arabidopsis jmjC domain protein protects transcribed genes from DNA methylation at CHG sites.

Authors:  Asuka Miura; Miyuki Nakamura; Soichi Inagaki; Akie Kobayashi; Hidetoshi Saze; Tetsuji Kakutani
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Stable transgenerational epigenetic inheritance requires a DNA methylation-sensing circuit.

Authors:  Ben P Williams; Mary Gehring
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  How do plants remember drought?

Authors:  Ayan Sadhukhan; Shiva Sai Prasad; Jayeeta Mitra; Nadeem Siddiqui; Lingaraj Sahoo; Yuriko Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Koyama
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 2.  Exploitation of epigenetic variation of crop wild relatives for crop improvement and agrobiodiversity preservation.

Authors:  Serena Varotto; Tamar Krugman; Riccardo Aiese Cigliano; Khalil Kashkush; Ankica Kondić-Špika; Fillipos A Aravanopoulos; Monica Pradillo; Federica Consiglio; Riccardo Aversano; Ales Pecinka; Dragana Miladinović
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Molecular properties of epimutation hotspots.

Authors:  Rashmi R Hazarika; Michele Serra; Zhilin Zhang; Yinwen Zhang; Robert J Schmitz; Frank Johannes
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 17.352

4.  Adverse maternal environment affects hippocampal HTR2c variant expression and epigenetic characteristics in mouse offspring.

Authors:  Xingrao Ke; Yingliu Huang; Qi Fu; Amber Majnik; Robert H Lane
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.953

Review 5.  Epimutations Define a Fast-Ticking Molecular Clock in Plants.

Authors:  Nan Yao; Robert J Schmitz; Frank Johannes
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 11.821

6.  Developmental Methylome of the Medicinal Plant Catharanthus roseus Unravels the Tissue-Specific Control of the Monoterpene Indole Alkaloid Pathway by DNA Methylation.

Authors:  Thomas Dugé de Bernonville; Stéphane Maury; Alain Delaunay; Christian Daviaud; Cristian Chaparro; Jörg Tost; Sarah Ellen O'Connor; Vincent Courdavault
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Multifaceted Chromatin Structure and Transcription Changes in Plant Stress Response.

Authors:  Jin-Hong Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  A genome assembly and the somatic genetic and epigenetic mutation rate in a wild long-lived perennial Populus trichocarpa.

Authors:  Brigitte T Hofmeister; Johanna Denkena; Maria Colomé-Tatché; Yadollah Shahryary; Rashmi Hazarika; Jane Grimwood; Sujan Mamidi; Jerry Jenkins; Paul P Grabowski; Avinash Sreedasyam; Shengqiang Shu; Kerrie Barry; Kathleen Lail; Catherine Adam; Anna Lipzen; Rotem Sorek; Dave Kudrna; Jayson Talag; Rod Wing; David W Hall; Daniel Jacobsen; Gerald A Tuskan; Jeremy Schmutz; Frank Johannes; Robert J Schmitz
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Atypical DNA methylation, sRNA-size distribution, and female gametogenesis in Utricularia gibba.

Authors:  Sergio Alan Cervantes-Pérez; Lenin Yong-Villalobos; Nathalia M V Florez-Zapata; Araceli Oropeza-Aburto; Félix Rico-Reséndiz; Itzel Amasende-Morales; Tianying Lan; Octavio Martínez; Jean Philippe Vielle-Calzada; Victor A Albert; Luis Herrera-Estrella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Open chromatin in grapevine marks candidate CREs and with other chromatin features correlates with gene expression.

Authors:  Rachel Schwope; Gabriele Magris; Mara Miculan; Eleonora Paparelli; Mirko Celii; Aldo Tocci; Fabio Marroni; Alice Fornasiero; Emanuele De Paoli; Michele Morgante
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 6.417

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.