Literature DB >> 32071139

Abundance compensates kinetics: Similar effect of dopamine signals on D1 and D2 receptor populations.

Lars Hunger1, Arvind Kumar2, Robert Schmidt3.   

Abstract

The neuromodulator dopamine plays a key role in motivation, reward-related learning and normal motor function. The different affinity of striatal D1 and D2 dopamine receptor types has been argued to constrain the D1 and D2 signalling pathways to phasic and tonic dopamine signals, respectively. However, this view assumes that dopamine receptor kinetics are instantaneous so that the time courses of changes in dopamine concentration and changes in receptor occupation are basically identical. Here we developed a neurochemical model of dopamine receptor binding taking into account the different kinetics and abundance of D1 and D2 receptors in the striatum. Testing a large range of behaviorally-relevant dopamine signals, we found that the D1 and D2 dopamine receptor populations responded very similarly to tonic and phasic dopamine signals. Furthermore, due to slow unbinding rates, both receptor populations integrated dopamine signals over a timescale of minutes. Our model provides a description of how physiological dopamine signals translate into changes in dopamine receptor occupation in the striatum, and explains why dopamine ramps are an effective signal to occupy dopamine receptors. Overall, our model points to the importance of taking into account receptor kinetics for functional considerations of dopamine signalling.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTCurrent models of basal ganglia function are often based on a distinction of two types of dopamine receptors, D1 and D2, with low and high affinity, respectively. Thereby, phasic dopamine signals are believed to mostly affect striatal neurons with D1 receptors, and tonic dopamine signals are believed to mostly affect striatal neurons with D2 receptors. This view does not take into account the rates for the binding and unbinding of dopamine to D1 and D2 receptors. By incorporating these kinetics into a computational model we show that D1 and D2 receptors both respond to phasic and tonic dopamine signals. This has implications for the processing of reward-related and motivational signals in the basal ganglia.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32071139     DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1951-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  9 in total

1.  The Arousal-motor Hypothesis of Dopamine Function: Evidence that Dopamine Facilitates Reward Seeking in Part by Maintaining Arousal.

Authors:  Marcin Kaźmierczak; Saleem M Nicola
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Performance-gated deliberation: A context-adapted strategy in which urgency is opportunity cost.

Authors:  Maximilian Puelma Touzel; Paul Cisek; Guillaume Lajoie
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.779

3.  An integrative model of Parkinson's disease treatment including levodopa pharmacokinetics, dopamine kinetics, basal ganglia neurotransmission and motor action throughout disease progression.

Authors:  Florence Véronneau-Veilleux; Philippe Robaey; Mauro Ursino; Fahima Nekka
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  Spatial and temporal scales of dopamine transmission.

Authors:  Changliang Liu; Pragya Goel; Pascal S Kaeser
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Dopamine release, diffusion and uptake: A computational model for synaptic and volume transmission.

Authors:  Kathleen Wiencke; Annette Horstmann; David Mathar; Arno Villringer; Jane Neumann
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Effects of methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity on striatal long-term potentiation.

Authors:  Anne S Gibson; Peter J West; Kristen A Keefe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  A mechanistic model of ADHD as resulting from dopamine phasic/tonic imbalance during reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Florence Véronneau-Veilleux; Philippe Robaey; Mauro Ursino; Fahima Nekka
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.387

8.  Precise spatiotemporal control of voltage-gated sodium channels by photocaged saxitoxin.

Authors:  Anna V Elleman; Gabrielle Devienne; Christopher D Makinson; Allison L Haynes; John R Huguenard; J Du Bois
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 17.694

9.  Cortico-cortical connectivity behind acoustic information transfer to mouse orbitofrontal cortex is sensitive to neuromodulation and displays local sensory gating: relevance in disorders with auditory hallucinations?

Authors:  Anushree Tripathi; Sebastian Sulis Sato; Paolo Medini
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.186

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.