Literature DB >> 3207099

Comparison of death certificate occupation and industry data with lifetime occupational histories obtained by interview: variations in the accuracy of death certificate entries.

W J Schade1, G M Swanson.   

Abstract

This study compares usual and recent occupation and industry data from lifetime work histories obtained by interview with death certificate entries for occupation and industry for 2,435 persons diagnosed with cancer. Match rates are calculated as the percent of death certificate occupation and industry entries that were confirmed by interview data and are compared for exact 3-digit 1980 U.S. Census Bureau occupation and industry codes and for groups of these codes. The overall match rate for individual usual occupation codes was 47.9% and for exact usual industry codes it was 61.8%. Significant differences between the interview data for usual occupation or industry and the death certificate entry were observed by race and gender, marital status, number of years worked, and occupation and industry groups and by age for industry. Misclassification or overreporting of occupation and industry data on the death certificate ranged from 30 to 50% in this study. Our results suggest that the utility of death certificate data for investigations into the occupational risk factors for cancer may be quite limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3207099     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700140203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  10 in total

Review 1.  Occupational exposure and cancer of the pancreas: a review.

Authors:  F Pietri; F Clavel
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1991-09

2.  Breast cancer risk and lifetime occupational history: employment in professional and managerial occupations.

Authors:  S A Petralia; J E Vena; J L Freudenheim; J R Marshall; A Michalek; J Brasure; M Swanson; S Graham
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Female homicides in United States workplaces, 1980-1985.

Authors:  C A Bell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Diversity of trends in occupational injury mortality in the United States, 1980-96.

Authors:  D Loomis; J F Bena; A J Bailer
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Occupation as a risk identifier for breast cancer.

Authors:  C H Rubin; C A Burnett; W E Halperin; P J Seligman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Deindustrialisation and the long term decline in fatal occupational injuries.

Authors:  D Loomis; D B Richardson; J F Bena; A J Bailer
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Case-control study of occupational exposure to electric shocks and magnetic fields and mortality from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the US, 1991-1999.

Authors:  Ximena Vergara; Gabor Mezei; Leeka Kheifets
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 8.  Parental occupation and childhood cancer: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  D A Savitz; J H Chen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Demographic considerations in analyzing decedents by usual occupation.

Authors:  Cora Peterson; Pamela K Schumacher; Andrea L Steege
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Leukaemia incidence among workers in the shoe and boot manufacturing industry: a case-control study.

Authors:  Steven P Forand
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2004-08-30       Impact factor: 5.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.