Literature DB >> 32070905

The effect of implicit and explicit taxes on the purchasing of 'high-in-calorie' products: A randomized controlled trial.

Brett Doble1, Felicia Ang Jia Ler1, Eric A Finkelstein2.   

Abstract

Public health taxes on less healthy food and beverage products have been shown to be effective in various settings. However, it is unclear if observed reductions in the quantity of taxed products purchased is a result of price increases due to the tax or the accompanying messaging and if the effects are influenced by the level of support for such taxes within the population. 941 adults residing in Singapore were randomized and asked to shop in one of four versions of a fully functional on-line experimental grocery store: 1) no tax control; 2) implicit tax showing only post-tax prices (i.e., 20 % higher than control prices) on high-in-calorie products; 3) fake tax showing pre-tax prices and a label falsely indicating that the price includes a 20 % tax on high-in-calorie products; and 4) explicit tax showing the same label as in 3) and an actual 20 % price increase applied to the high-in-calorie products. The proportion of high-in-calorie products purchased was 14 % in the control arm. We were unable to reject the null hypothesis of no effect in the implicit tax arm compared to control (0.08, 95 % CI -3.31 to 1.77) or in the fake tax arm compared to the control (2.59, 95 % CI -5.04 to 0.00) but observed a statistically significant 3.35 percentage point decrease (95 % CI -6.01 to -0.5) in the explicit tax arm compared to control. We were unable to reject the null hypothesis of no effect in any of the outcomes related to diet quality. Individuals who support the tax showed greater responsiveness to the explicit and fake taxes compared to those who do not (price elasticities of demand of -1.38 and -0.51 respectively). Results suggest that reductions in the proportions of high-in-calorie products purchased may be largely attributable to explicit messaging rather than to price increases. However, even when effective, policymakers should recognize that changes in purchasing patterns may not improve diet quality and that results may not generalize to other areas where levels of support differ.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Behavioral economics; Explicit labelling; Obesity; Public health tax; Randomized controlled trial

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32070905     DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Econ Hum Biol        ISSN: 1570-677X            Impact factor:   2.184


  2 in total

1.  Decomposing consumer and producer effects on sugar from beverage purchases after a sugar-based tax on beverages in South Africa.

Authors:  Maxime Bercholz; Shu Wen Ng; Nicholas Stacey; Elizabeth C Swart
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.774

Review 2.  The Effectiveness of Interventions Delivered Using Digital Food Environments to Encourage Healthy Food Choices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Wyse; Jacklyn Kay Jackson; Tessa Delaney; Alice Grady; Fiona Stacey; Luke Wolfenden; Courtney Barnes; Matthew McLaughlin; Sze Lin Yoong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.717

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.